Literature DB >> 31121439

A reproductive justice approach to understanding women's experiences with HPV and cervical cancer prevention.

Beth Sundstrom1, Ellie Smith2, Cara Delay3, John S Luque4, Caroline Davila5, Bailey Feder6, Vincenza Paddock6, Jessie Poudrier6, Jennifer Young Pierce7, Heather M Brandt8.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a preventable disease. HPV infection has been linked to more than 90% of cervical cancers. A vaccine to prevent the acquisition of HPV has been available since 2006. The purpose of this study was to investigate women's perceptions of cervical cancer prevention, including HPV vaccination. A reproductive justice framework guided data collection and analysis. In 2016, researchers conducted 70 in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews with women aged 19-78 years in South Carolina. A purposive sampling approach was employed to maximize requisite variety based on social, economic, and environmental axes of inequality. Participants self-identified as white (53%), African American (33%), and Hispanic (9%). Data analysis included an inductive constant comparative method to identify patterns and themes across the interviews. Misinformation about the prevalence and risk of HPV and cervical cancer led to "othering" of women with HPV-related diagnoses based on the flawed assumption of not being at risk. Participants described a lack of knowledge about the effectiveness and safety of the HPV vaccine. Social norms influenced participants' perceptions of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer, including concerns about sexual activity and intergenerational communication. Participants' social construction of identity, including race/ethnicity, socioeconomic position, ability, age, gender, sexual orientation, and immigration status, impacted their perceptions of cervical cancer screening and the HPV vaccine. In particular, participants believed that the HPV vaccine was "only for girls" and identified gender norms that limited uptake. Participants described barriers to accessing health care and cervical cancer screening, including cost, health insurance, and life changes (e.g., pregnancy, relocating). Many participants experienced an abnormal Papanicolaou test and described follow-up care, including biopsies and treatment for cervical dysplasia. Findings from this study offer insight into women's identity and perceptions of cervical cancer prevention. Results provide practical recommendations to increase women's agency in the development of successful public health interventions.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; HPV; Qualitative methodology; Reproductive justice; United States

Year:  2019        PMID: 31121439     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abirami Kirubarajan; Shannon Leung; Xinglin Li; Matthew Yau; Mara Sobel
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Correcting HPV Vaccination Misinformation Online: Evaluating the HPV Vaccination NOW Social Media Campaign.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Kathleen B Cartmell; Ashley A White; Henry Well; Jennifer Young Pierce; Heather M Brandt
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-06

3.  Understanding no-show behaviour for cervical cancer screening appointments among hard-to-reach women in Bogotá, Colombia: A mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  David Barrera Ferro; Steffen Bayer; Laura Bocanegra; Sally Brailsford; Adriana Díaz; Elena Valentina Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez; Honora Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Federica Vallone; Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Francesco Palumbo; Elvira Lorenzo; Angelo D'Argenzio; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.955

5.  The Relationship between Healthcare Providers and Preventive Practices: Narratives on Access to Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.