Literature DB >> 31121035

Xenograft-based, platform-independent gene signatures to predict response to alkylating chemotherapy, radiation, and combination therapy for glioblastoma.

Shuang G Zhao1, Menggang Yu2, Daniel E Spratt1, S Laura Chang3, Felix Y Feng3, Michelle M Kim1, Corey W Speers1, Brett L Carlson4, Ann C Mladek4, Theodore S Lawrence1, Jann N Sarkaria4, Daniel R Wahl1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predictive molecular biomarkers to select optimal treatment for patients with glioblastoma and other cancers are lacking. New strategies are needed when large randomized trials with correlative molecular data are not feasible.
METHODS: Gene signatures (GS) were developed from 31 orthotopic glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), treated with standard therapies, to predict benefit from radiotherapy (RT-GS), temozolomide (Chemo-GS), or the combination (ChemoRT-GS). Independent validation was performed in a heterogeneously treated clinical cohort of 502 glioblastoma patients with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables and evaluate interactions between signatures and treatment.
RESULTS: PDX models recapitulated the clinical heterogeneity of glioblastoma patients. RT-GS, Chemo-GS, and ChemoRT-GS were correlated with benefit from treatment in the PDX models. In independent clinical validation, higher RT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving RT (P = 0.0031, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78 [0.66-0.92]), higher Chemo-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving chemotherapy (P < 0.0001, HR = 0.66 [0.55-0.8]), and higher ChemoRT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving ChemoRT (P = 0.0001, HR = 0.54 [0.4-0.74]). RT-GS and ChemoRT-GS had significant interactions with treatment on multivariate analysis (P = 0.0009 and 0.02, respectively), indicating that they are bona fide predictive biomarkers.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a novel PDX-driven methodology, we developed and validated 3 platform-independent molecular signatures that predict benefit from standard of care therapies for glioblastoma. These signatures may be useful to personalize glioblastoma treatment in the clinic and this approach may be a generalizable method to identify predictive biomarkers without resource-intensive randomized trials.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glioblastoma; biomarker; patient-derived xenograft; radiation; signature; temozolomide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31121035      PMCID: PMC6736132          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  33 in total

1.  An in vivo platform for translational drug development in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Belen Rubio-Viqueira; Antonio Jimeno; George Cusatis; Xianfeng Zhang; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Collins Karikari; Chanjusn Shi; Kathleen Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Koji Tanaka; Sharat Singh; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Nadia Bouraoud; Maria L Amador; Soner Altiok; Piotr Kulesza; Charles Yeo; Wells Messersmith; James Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  High-throughput screening using patient-derived tumor xenografts to predict clinical trial drug response.

Authors:  Hui Gao; Joshua M Korn; Stéphane Ferretti; John E Monahan; Youzhen Wang; Mallika Singh; Chao Zhang; Christian Schnell; Guizhi Yang; Yun Zhang; O Alejandro Balbin; Stéphanie Barbe; Hongbo Cai; Fergal Casey; Susmita Chatterjee; Derek Y Chiang; Shannon Chuai; Shawn M Cogan; Scott D Collins; Ernesta Dammassa; Nicolas Ebel; Millicent Embry; John Green; Audrey Kauffmann; Colleen Kowal; Rebecca J Leary; Joseph Lehar; Ying Liang; Alice Loo; Edward Lorenzana; E Robert McDonald; Margaret E McLaughlin; Jason Merkin; Ronald Meyer; Tara L Naylor; Montesa Patawaran; Anupama Reddy; Claudia Röelli; David A Ruddy; Fernando Salangsang; Francesca Santacroce; Angad P Singh; Yan Tang; Walter Tinetto; Sonja Tobler; Roberto Velazquez; Kavitha Venkatesan; Fabian Von Arx; Hui Qin Wang; Zongyao Wang; Marion Wiesmann; Daniel Wyss; Fiona Xu; Hans Bitter; Peter Atadja; Emma Lees; Francesco Hofmann; En Li; Nicholas Keen; Robert Cozens; Michael Rugaard Jensen; Nancy K Pryer; Juliet A Williams; William R Sellers
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Development and validation of a 24-gene predictor of response to postoperative radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a matched, retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Shuang G Zhao; S Laura Chang; Daniel E Spratt; Nicholas Erho; Menggang Yu; Hussam Al-Deen Ashab; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Corey Speers; Scott A Tomlins; Elai Davicioni; Adam P Dicker; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; R Jeffrey Karnes; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Robert B Den; Paul L Nguyen; Felix Y Feng
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine?

Authors:  Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Guido Reifenberger; Alba A Brandes; Martin J van den Bent; Wolfgang Wick; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  Short-Course Radiation plus Temozolomide in Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma.

Authors:  James R Perry; Normand Laperriere; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Alba A Brandes; Johan Menten; Claire Phillips; Michael Fay; Ryo Nishikawa; J Gregory Cairncross; Wilson Roa; David Osoba; John P Rossiter; Arjun Sahgal; Hal Hirte; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Enrico Franceschi; Olivier Chinot; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Laura Fariselli; Antje Wick; Loic Feuvret; Michael Back; Michael Tills; Chad Winch; Brigitta G Baumert; Wolfgang Wick; Keyue Ding; Warren P Mason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Improving the efficacy of chemoradiation with targeted agents.

Authors:  Meredith A Morgan; Leslie A Parsels; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Retinoblastoma Binding Protein 4 Modulates Temozolomide Sensitivity in Glioblastoma by Regulating DNA Repair Proteins.

Authors:  Gaspar J Kitange; Ann C Mladek; Mark A Schroeder; Jenny C Pokorny; Brett L Carlson; Yuji Zhang; Asha A Nair; Jeong-Heon Lee; Huihuang Yan; Paul A Decker; Zhiguo Zhang; Jann N Sarkaria
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  A molecularly annotated platform of patient-derived xenografts ("xenopatients") identifies HER2 as an effective therapeutic target in cetuximab-resistant colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Bertotti; Giorgia Migliardi; Francesco Galimi; Francesco Sassi; Davide Torti; Claudio Isella; Davide Corà; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Michela Buscarino; Consalvo Petti; Dario Ribero; Nadia Russolillo; Andrea Muratore; Paolo Massucco; Alberto Pisacane; Luca Molinaro; Emanuele Valtorta; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Mauro Risio; Lorenzo Capussotti; Marcello Gambacorta; Salvatore Siena; Enzo Medico; Anna Sapino; Silvia Marsoni; Paolo M Comoglio; Alberto Bardelli; Livio Trusolino
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  An optimized five-gene multi-platform predictor of hormone receptor negative and triple negative breast cancer metastatic risk.

Authors:  Christina Yau; John Sninsky; Shirley Kwok; Alice Wang; Amy Degnim; James N Ingle; Cheryl Gillett; Andrew Tutt; Fred Waldman; Dan Moore; Laura Esserman; Christopher C Benz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of Brain Irradiation in Immune-Competent and Immune-Compromised Mouse Models.

Authors:  Mohammad Saki; Kruttika Bhat; Sirajbir S Sodhi; Nhan T Nguyen; Harley I Kornblum; Frank Pajonk
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Expression of the Androgen Receptor Governs Radiation Resistance in a Subset of Glioblastomas Vulnerable to Antiandrogen Therapy.

Authors:  Christian K Werner; Uchechi J Nna; Hanshi Sun; Kari Wilder-Romans; Joseph Dresser; Ayesha U Kothari; Weihua Zhou; Yangyang Yao; Arvind Rao; Stefanie Stallard; Carl Koschmann; Tarik Bor; Waldemar Debinski; Alexander M Hegedus; Meredith A Morgan; Sriram Venneti; Edwina Baskin-Bey; Daniel E Spratt; Howard Colman; Jann N Sarkaria; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Joel R Eisner; Corey Speers; Theodore S Lawrence; Roy E Strowd; Daniel R Wahl
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Establishment and Characterisation of Heterotopic Patient-Derived Xenografts for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Sarah Meneceur; Annett Linge; Matthias Meinhardt; Sandra Hering; Steffen Löck; Rebecca Bütof; Dietmar Krex; Gabriele Schackert; Achim Temme; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Cläre von Neubeck
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  The Role of Network Science in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marta B Lopes; Eduarda P Martins; Susana Vinga; Bruno M Costa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.