BACKGROUND: Predictive molecular biomarkers to select optimal treatment for patients with glioblastoma and other cancers are lacking. New strategies are needed when large randomized trials with correlative molecular data are not feasible. METHODS: Gene signatures (GS) were developed from 31 orthotopic glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), treated with standard therapies, to predict benefit from radiotherapy (RT-GS), temozolomide (Chemo-GS), or the combination (ChemoRT-GS). Independent validation was performed in a heterogeneously treated clinical cohort of 502 glioblastoma patients with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables and evaluate interactions between signatures and treatment. RESULTS: PDX models recapitulated the clinical heterogeneity of glioblastoma patients. RT-GS, Chemo-GS, and ChemoRT-GS were correlated with benefit from treatment in the PDX models. In independent clinical validation, higher RT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving RT (P = 0.0031, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78 [0.66-0.92]), higher Chemo-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving chemotherapy (P < 0.0001, HR = 0.66 [0.55-0.8]), and higher ChemoRT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving ChemoRT (P = 0.0001, HR = 0.54 [0.4-0.74]). RT-GS and ChemoRT-GS had significant interactions with treatment on multivariate analysis (P = 0.0009 and 0.02, respectively), indicating that they are bona fide predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Using a novel PDX-driven methodology, we developed and validated 3 platform-independent molecular signatures that predict benefit from standard of care therapies for glioblastoma. These signatures may be useful to personalize glioblastoma treatment in the clinic and this approach may be a generalizable method to identify predictive biomarkers without resource-intensive randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Predictive molecular biomarkers to select optimal treatment for patients with glioblastoma and other cancers are lacking. New strategies are needed when large randomized trials with correlative molecular data are not feasible. METHODS: Gene signatures (GS) were developed from 31 orthotopic glioblastomapatient-derived xenografts (PDXs), treated with standard therapies, to predict benefit from radiotherapy (RT-GS), temozolomide (Chemo-GS), or the combination (ChemoRT-GS). Independent validation was performed in a heterogeneously treated clinical cohort of 502 glioblastomapatients with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables and evaluate interactions between signatures and treatment. RESULTS: PDX models recapitulated the clinical heterogeneity of glioblastomapatients. RT-GS, Chemo-GS, and ChemoRT-GS were correlated with benefit from treatment in the PDX models. In independent clinical validation, higher RT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving RT (P = 0.0031, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78 [0.66-0.92]), higher Chemo-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving chemotherapy (P < 0.0001, HR = 0.66 [0.55-0.8]), and higher ChemoRT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving ChemoRT (P = 0.0001, HR = 0.54 [0.4-0.74]). RT-GS and ChemoRT-GS had significant interactions with treatment on multivariate analysis (P = 0.0009 and 0.02, respectively), indicating that they are bona fide predictive biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: Using a novel PDX-driven methodology, we developed and validated 3 platform-independent molecular signatures that predict benefit from standard of care therapies for glioblastoma. These signatures may be useful to personalize glioblastoma treatment in the clinic and this approach may be a generalizable method to identify predictive biomarkers without resource-intensive randomized trials.
Authors: Belen Rubio-Viqueira; Antonio Jimeno; George Cusatis; Xianfeng Zhang; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Collins Karikari; Chanjusn Shi; Kathleen Danenberg; Peter V Danenberg; Hidekazu Kuramochi; Koji Tanaka; Sharat Singh; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Nadia Bouraoud; Maria L Amador; Soner Altiok; Piotr Kulesza; Charles Yeo; Wells Messersmith; James Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hui Gao; Joshua M Korn; Stéphane Ferretti; John E Monahan; Youzhen Wang; Mallika Singh; Chao Zhang; Christian Schnell; Guizhi Yang; Yun Zhang; O Alejandro Balbin; Stéphanie Barbe; Hongbo Cai; Fergal Casey; Susmita Chatterjee; Derek Y Chiang; Shannon Chuai; Shawn M Cogan; Scott D Collins; Ernesta Dammassa; Nicolas Ebel; Millicent Embry; John Green; Audrey Kauffmann; Colleen Kowal; Rebecca J Leary; Joseph Lehar; Ying Liang; Alice Loo; Edward Lorenzana; E Robert McDonald; Margaret E McLaughlin; Jason Merkin; Ronald Meyer; Tara L Naylor; Montesa Patawaran; Anupama Reddy; Claudia Röelli; David A Ruddy; Fernando Salangsang; Francesca Santacroce; Angad P Singh; Yan Tang; Walter Tinetto; Sonja Tobler; Roberto Velazquez; Kavitha Venkatesan; Fabian Von Arx; Hui Qin Wang; Zongyao Wang; Marion Wiesmann; Daniel Wyss; Fiona Xu; Hans Bitter; Peter Atadja; Emma Lees; Francesco Hofmann; En Li; Nicholas Keen; Robert Cozens; Michael Rugaard Jensen; Nancy K Pryer; Juliet A Williams; William R Sellers Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Shuang G Zhao; S Laura Chang; Daniel E Spratt; Nicholas Erho; Menggang Yu; Hussam Al-Deen Ashab; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Corey Speers; Scott A Tomlins; Elai Davicioni; Adam P Dicker; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Stephen J Freedland; R Jeffrey Karnes; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Robert B Den; Paul L Nguyen; Felix Y Feng Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Guido Reifenberger; Alba A Brandes; Martin J van den Bent; Wolfgang Wick; Monika E Hegi Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: James R Perry; Normand Laperriere; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Alba A Brandes; Johan Menten; Claire Phillips; Michael Fay; Ryo Nishikawa; J Gregory Cairncross; Wilson Roa; David Osoba; John P Rossiter; Arjun Sahgal; Hal Hirte; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Enrico Franceschi; Olivier Chinot; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Laura Fariselli; Antje Wick; Loic Feuvret; Michael Back; Michael Tills; Chad Winch; Brigitta G Baumert; Wolfgang Wick; Keyue Ding; Warren P Mason Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-03-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gaspar J Kitange; Ann C Mladek; Mark A Schroeder; Jenny C Pokorny; Brett L Carlson; Yuji Zhang; Asha A Nair; Jeong-Heon Lee; Huihuang Yan; Paul A Decker; Zhiguo Zhang; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Andrea Bertotti; Giorgia Migliardi; Francesco Galimi; Francesco Sassi; Davide Torti; Claudio Isella; Davide Corà; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Michela Buscarino; Consalvo Petti; Dario Ribero; Nadia Russolillo; Andrea Muratore; Paolo Massucco; Alberto Pisacane; Luca Molinaro; Emanuele Valtorta; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Mauro Risio; Lorenzo Capussotti; Marcello Gambacorta; Salvatore Siena; Enzo Medico; Anna Sapino; Silvia Marsoni; Paolo M Comoglio; Alberto Bardelli; Livio Trusolino Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Christina Yau; John Sninsky; Shirley Kwok; Alice Wang; Amy Degnim; James N Ingle; Cheryl Gillett; Andrew Tutt; Fred Waldman; Dan Moore; Laura Esserman; Christopher C Benz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2013 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Mohammad Saki; Kruttika Bhat; Sirajbir S Sodhi; Nhan T Nguyen; Harley I Kornblum; Frank Pajonk Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Christian K Werner; Uchechi J Nna; Hanshi Sun; Kari Wilder-Romans; Joseph Dresser; Ayesha U Kothari; Weihua Zhou; Yangyang Yao; Arvind Rao; Stefanie Stallard; Carl Koschmann; Tarik Bor; Waldemar Debinski; Alexander M Hegedus; Meredith A Morgan; Sriram Venneti; Edwina Baskin-Bey; Daniel E Spratt; Howard Colman; Jann N Sarkaria; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Joel R Eisner; Corey Speers; Theodore S Lawrence; Roy E Strowd; Daniel R Wahl Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 6.261