| Literature DB >> 31121007 |
Baiyan Gong1, Yaming Yang2, Xiaohua Liu1, Jianping Cao3, Meng Xu3, Ning Xu3, Fengkun Yang1, Fangwei Wu2, Benfu Li2, Aiqin Liu1, Yujuan Shen3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterocytozoon bieneusi is the most common microsporidian species causing diarrhea and other intestinal disorders in humans and animals. Like other infectious diseases, microsporidiosis usually disproportionately affects poor populations. In China, some ethnic minority areas remain poor. Currently, no information of E. bieneusi infection is available in minority populations. The present aims were to understand occurrence and genetic characterizations of E. bieneusi in ethnic minority groups from a poverty-stricken ethnic township in Yunnan Province, and to assess risk factors for E. bieneusi infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31121007 PMCID: PMC6550416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007356
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Assessment of possible risk factors for E. bieneusi infection in Yao people.
| Variable | Examined no. | Positive no. (%) | OR (95% CI | χ2/ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 153 | 10 (6.54) | 0.61 (0.26, 1.42) | 1.34/0.25 |
| Female | 136 | 14 (10.29) | |||
| Diarrhea | Yes | 43 | 4 (9.30) | 0.86 (0.28, 2.66) | 0/1.00 |
| No | 246 | 20 (8.13) | |||
| Drinking boiled water | Yes | 258 | 23 (8.91) | 0.93 (0.12, 7.52) | 0/1.00 |
| No | 12 | 1 (8.33) | |||
| Washing hands before meals | Yes | 224 | 21 (9.38) | 0.67 (0.19, 2.36) | 0.11/0.74 |
| No | 46 | 3 (6.52) | |||
| Washing hands after using toilets | Yes | 242 | 23 (9.50) | 0.35 (0.05, 2.72) | 0.48/0.49 |
| No | 28 | 1 (3.57) | |||
| Eating unwashed vegetables and fruits | Yes | 236 | 23 (9.75) | 0.28 (0.04, 2.15) | 0.96/0.33 |
| No | 34 | 1 (2.94) | |||
| Swimming | Yes | 40 | 1 (2.50) | 4.33 (0.57, 33.03) | 1.53/0.22 |
| No | 230 | 23 (10.00) | |||
| Pit toilet | Public | 198 | 12 (6.06) | 0.32 (0.14, 0.76) | |
| Individual | 72 | 12(16.67) | |||
| Feeding patterns of animals | Free-ranging | 50 | 3 (6.00) | 0.51 (0.08, 3.34) | 0.04/0.85 |
| Both free-ranging and captive | 202 | 19 (9.41) | 0.83 (0.18, 3.89) | 0/1.00 | |
| Captive | 18 | 2 (11.11) | Ref | ||
a Swimming in ponds in the investigated areas.
b Only 270 participants provided complete information other than gender and clinical signs (diarrhea).
c CI, confidence interval.
d Bold type for values indicates statistical significance.
Prevalence and genotype distribution of E. bieneusi in Yao people by village.
| Location | Examined no. | Positive no. (%) | Genotype/s (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| known | novel | |||
| Guangming Village | 93 | 11 (11.83) | Peru 6 (11) | |
| Nangongshan Village | 110 | 9 (8.18) | Peru 6 (8) | YN104 (1) |
| Suoshanjiao Village | 86 | 4 (4.65) | Peru 6 (2) | YN241 (1), YN249 (1) |
| Total | 289 | 24 | Peru 6 (21) | YN104 (1), YN241 (1), YN249 (1) |
a Four with diarrhea and 20 without diarrhea in 24 positive samples.
Fig 1Phylogenetic relationships of the genotypes of E. bieneusi.
The relationships of the genotypes of E. bieneusi identified in this study and known genotypes published in GenBank were inferred by a neighbor-joining analysis of ITS sequences based on genetic distances calculated by the Kimura 2-parameter model. The numbers on the branches are percent bootstrapping values from 1000 replicates. Each sequence is identified by its accession number, host origin, and genotype designation. The group terminology for the clusters is based on the work of Zhang et al. [19]. The circle and the triangles filled in black indicate known genotype Peru6 and novel genotypes identified in this study, respectively.
Prevalences and genotypes of E. bieneusi in humans in China.
| Location | Population | Positive no./Examined no. (%) | Genotype (no.) | Zoonotic genotype (no.) | % zoonotic | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chongqing | Diarrheal children | 11/93 (11.83) | PigEBITS5 (3), CC2 (2), CQ-H1 (1), CQ-H2 (2), CQ-H3 (2), CQ-H4 (1) | PigEBITS5 (3), CC2 (2) | 45.45 | [ |
| Guangxi | HIV-positive patients | 33/285 (11.58) | EbpC (4), D (11), PigEBITS7 (7), type IV (8), GX25 (1), GX456 (1), GX458 (1) | EbpC (4), D (11), PigEBITS7 (7), type IV (8) | 90.90 | [ |
| Henan | HIV-positive patients | 39/683 (5.71) | EbpC (18), D (7), type IV (6), PigEBITS7 (1), Peru8 (1), EbpD (1), Henan-I-V (1 each) | EbpC (18), D (7), type IV (6), PigEBITS7 (1), Peru8 (1), EbpD (1), Henan-I (1), Henan-III-V (1 each) | 97.44 | [ |
| HIV-negative patients | 29/683 (4.25) | EbpC (21), D (5), Peru11 (1), type IV (1), Unknown (1) | EbpC (21), D (5), Peru11 (1), type IV (1) | 96.55 | [ | |
| Heilongjiang | Children without gastrointestinal diseases | 19/255 (7.45) | EbpC (11), CS-4 (2), Henan-IV (3), NEC1–5 (1 each) | EbpC (11), CS-4 (2), Henan-IV (3) | 76.19 | [ |
| Cancer patients | 5/381 (1.31) | D (4), HLJ-CP1 (1) | D (4) | 80.00 | [ | |
| Jilin | Diarrheal children | 9/40 (22.50) | 90.00 | [ | ||
| Shanghai | Children without gastrointestinal diseases | 24/573 (4.18) | EbpC (1), D (1), Peru11 (6), EbpA (2), SH1 (1), SH2 (3), SH3 (1), SH4 (1), | EbpC (1), D (1), Peru11 (6), EbpA (2), SH2 (3), | 70.83 | [ |
| Diarrheal children | 23/169 (13.61) | [ | ||||
| Diarrheal adults | 11/83 (13.25) | [ | ||||
| Hubei | Diarrheal children | 1/500 (0.20) | D (1) | D (1) | 100 | [ |
| Total | 204/3745 (5.45) | EbpC (55), D (29), PigEBITS7 (8), Peru11 (7), type IV (16), BEB4 (5), CHN2 (2), CHN3 (4), CHN4 (3), I (3), J (3), CS-4 (2), EbpA (2), NEC1–5 (1 each), EbpD (1), Peru8 (1), Henan-I (2), Henan-II (1), Henan-III (1), Henan-IV (4), Henan-V (1), SH1 (1), SH2 (3), SH3 (1), SH4 (1), BEB6 (1), SH6 (1), SH8–11 (1 each), GX25 (1), GX456 (1), GX458 (1), HLJ-CP1 (1), PigEBITS5 (3), CC2 (2), CQ-H1 (1), CQ-H2 (2), CQ-H3 (2), CQ-H4 (1), Unknown (1) | EbpC (55), D (29), PigEBITS7 (8), Peru11 (7), type IV (16), BEB4 (5), CHN3 (4), CHN4 (3), I (3), J (3), CS-4 (2), EbpA (2), EbpD (1), Peru8 (1), Henan-I (2), Henan-III (1), Henan-IV (4), Henan-V (1), SH2 (3), BEB6 (1), SH8 (1), PigEBITS5 (3), CC2 (2) | 85.79 |
The bolded genotypes belong to group 2.
a Only four children had diarrhea in the study conducted by Yang et al [31].
b Mixed infections were found in the two studies conducted by Yang et al. [31] and Zhang et al. [22].
c E. bieneusi was only identified based on sequence analysis of the SSU rRNA gene in a study conducted by Liu et al. [27].
d Four genotypes in Table 3 have been changed to the first published names instead of genotype names described in original papers (SH5 to BEB6, CHN1 to BEB4, SH12 to type IV, SH7 to Henan-I).
Host range and geographical distribution of genotype Peru6 of E. bieneusi.
| Host | Country | Positive no. | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human | Portugal | 14 | [ |
| Peru | >4 | [ | |
| China | 21 | This study | |
| Mammals | |||
| brown rat | China | 2 | [ |
| giant panda | China | 3 | [ |
| rabbit | China | 1 | [ |
| reindeer | China | 6 | [ |
| goat | China | 3 | [ |
| sheep | China | 5 | [ |
| cattle | America | 1 | [ |
| dog | Portugal | 1 | [ |
| Birds | |||
| pigeon | Portugal | 18 | [ |
| lovebird | Portugal | 1 | [ |
| chicken | Brazil | 1 | [ |
| rock pigeon | Brazil | 2 | [ |
| rook | Poland | 1 | [ |
| duck | China | 2 | [ |
| goose | China | 3 | [ |
| pigeon | China | 22 | [ |
| red-crowned crane | China | 2 | [ |
| Wastewater | China | 7 | [ |
| Total | >120 |
a unspecific case number of genotype Peru6 in one study conducted in Peru by Cama et al. [42].