Literature DB >> 31119874

Are mothers less likely to breastfeed in harsh environments? Physical environmental quality and breastfeeding in the Born in Bradford study.

Laura J Brown1, Rebecca Sear1.   

Abstract

We use the United Kingdom's Born in Bradford study to investigate whether women in lower quality environments are less likely to breastfeed. We use measures of physical environmental quality (water disinfectant by-products [DBPs], air pollution, passive cigarette smoke, and household condition) alongside socio-economic indicators, to explore in detail how different exposures influence breastfeeding. Drawing on evolutionary life history theory, we predict that lower environmental quality will be associated with lower odds of initiating, and higher hazards of stopping, breastfeeding. As low physical environmental quality may increase the risk of adverse birth outcomes, which may in turn affect breastfeeding chances, we also test for mediation by gestational age, birthweight, head circumference, and abdominal circumference. Our sample is composed of mothers who gave birth at the Bradford Royal Infirmary in West Yorkshire between March 2007 and December 2010 for whom breastfeeding initiation data was available. Analyses were stratified by the two largest ethnic groups: White British (n = 3,951) and Pakistani-origin (n = 4,411) mothers. After controlling for socio-economic position, Pakistani-origin mothers had lower chances of initiating and higher chances of stopping breastfeeding with increased water DBP exposure (e.g., OR for 0.03-0.61 vs. <0.02 μg/day dibromochloromethane exposure 0.70 [0.58-0.83], HR 1.16 [0.99-1.36]), greater air pollution exposure predicted lower chances of initiation for both ethnic groups (e.g., OR for 10 μg/m3 increase in nitrogen dioxide 0.81 [0.66-0.99] for White British mothers and 0.79 [0.67-0.94] for Pakistani-origin mothers) but also a reduced hazard of stopping breastfeeding for White British mothers (HR 0.65 [0.52-0.80]), and exposure to household damp/mould predicted higher chances of breastfeeding initiation amongst White British mothers (OR 1.66 [1.11-2.47]). We found no evidence that physical environmental quality effects on breastfeeding were mediated through birth outcomes amongst Pakistani-origin mothers and only weak evidence (p < 0.10) amongst White British mothers (exposure to passive cigarette smoke was associated with having lower birthweight infants who were in turn less likely to be breastfed whereas greater air pollution exposure was associated with longer gestations and in turn reduced hazards of stopping breastfeeding). Overall, our findings suggest that there is differential susceptibility to environmental exposures according to ethnicity. Although the water DBP results for Pakistani-origin mothers and air pollution-initiation results for both ethnic groups support our hypothesis that mothers exhibit reduced breastfeeding in poorer quality environments, several physical environmental quality indicators showed null or positive associations with breastfeeding outcomes. We consider physiological explanations for our findings and their implications for life history theory and public health policy.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Born in Bradford; breastfeeding; pollution; smoke; socio-economic position; trihalomethanes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31119874      PMCID: PMC6859989          DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  66 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and breastfeeding initiation among California mothers.

Authors:  Katherine E Heck; Paula Braveman; Catherine Cubbin; Gilberto F Chávez; John L Kiely
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Modes of Infant Feeding and the Risk of Childhood Asthma: A Prospective Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  Annika Klopp; Lorena Vehling; Allan B Becker; Padmaja Subbarao; Piushkumar J Mandhane; Stuart E Turvey; Diana L Lefebvre; Malcolm R Sears; Meghan B Azad
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Trade-offs underlying maternal breastfeeding decisions: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Meta-analysis of mould and dampness exposure on asthma and allergy in eight European birth cohorts: an ENRIECO initiative.

Authors:  C G Tischer; C Hohmann; E Thiering; O Herbarth; A Müller; J Henderson; R Granell; M P Fantini; L Luciano; A Bergström; I Kull; E Link; A von Berg; C E Kuehni; M-P F Strippoli; U Gehring; A Wijga; E Eller; C Bindslev-Jensen; T Keil; J Heinrich
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.146

5.  Resource availability, mortality, and fertility: a path analytic approach to global life-history variation.

Authors:  Mark A Caudell; Robert J Quinlan
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.553

6.  Infant feeding choices: experience, self-identity and lifestyle.

Authors:  Naomi Andrew; Kate Harvey
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Neighborhood effects on birthweight: an exploration of psychosocial and behavioral pathways in Baltimore, 1995--1996.

Authors:  Ashley Schempf; Donna Strobino; Patricia O'Campo
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Barriers to compliance with infant-feeding recommendations among low-income women.

Authors:  M Jane Heinig; Jennifer R Follett; Kara D Ishii; Katherine Kavanagh-Prochaska; Roberta Cohen; Jeanette Panchula
Journal:  J Hum Lact       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.219

Review 9.  Environmental risk factors of pregnancy outcomes: a summary of recent meta-analyses of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Payam Dadvand; James Grellier; David Martinez; Martine Vrijheid
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Impact of ambient air pollution on gestational age is modified by season in Sydney, Australia.

Authors:  Bin Jalaludin; Trish Mannes; Geoffrey Morgan; Doug Lincoln; Vicky Sheppeard; Stephen Corbett
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  4 in total

1.  Are mothers less likely to breastfeed in harsh environments? Physical environmental quality and breastfeeding in the Born in Bradford study.

Authors:  Laura J Brown; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Breastfeeding and the risk of childhood cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Su; Xiaohui Sun; Liwen Zhu; Qin Yan; Peiwen Zheng; Yingying Mao; Ding Ye
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 3.  Protective Effect of Breastfeeding on the Adverse Health Effects Induced by Air Pollution: Current Evidence and Possible Mechanisms.

Authors:  Monika A Zielinska; Jadwiga Hamulka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Subjective Environmental Experiences and Women's Breastfeeding Journeys: A Survival Analysis Using an Online Survey of UK Mothers.

Authors:  Laura J Brown; Sarah Myers; Abigail E Page; Emily H Emmott
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.