Literature DB >> 31119579

A stepwise learning curve to define the standard for technical improvement in laparoscopic liver resections: complexity-based analysis in 1032 procedures.

Luca Aldrighetti1, Federica Cipriani2, Guido Fiorentini2, Marco Catena2, Michele Paganelli2, Francesca Ratti2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to define the learning curve in a series of procedures grouped according to their complexity calculated by difficulty index to define a standard for technical improvement. 1032 laparoscopic liver resections performed in a single tertiary referral center were stratified by difficulty scores: low difficulty (LD, n = 362); intermediate difficulty (ID, n = 332), and high difficulty (HD, n = 338). The learning curve effect was analyzed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method taking into consideration the expected risk of conversion. The ratio of laparoscopic/total liver resections increased from 5.8% (2005) to 71.1% (2018). The CUSUM analysis per group showed that the average value of the conversion rate was reached at the 60th case in the LD Group and at the 15th in the ID and HD groups. The evolution from LD to ID and HD procedures occurred only when learning curve in LD resections was concluded. Reflecting different degree of complexity, procedures showed significantly different blood loss, morbidity, and conversions among groups. A standard educational model-stepwise and progressive-is mandatory to allow surgeons to define the technical and technological backgrounds to deal with a specific degree of difficulty, providing a help in the definition of indications to laparoscopic approach in each phase of training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficulty; Expertise; Laparoscopy; Learning curve; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31119579     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00658-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  7 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: The SMART-ALPPS Protocol-Strategy to Minimize ALPPS Risks by Targeting Invasiveness.

Authors:  G Fiorentini; F Ratti; F Cipriani; L Aldrighetti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Technical Insights on Laparoscopic Left and Right Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Guido Fiorentini; Federica Cipriani; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Laparoscopic Surgery of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Between Oncologic Adequacy and Technical Challenges.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus Robotic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Taslim Aboudou; Meixuan Li; Zeliang Zhang; Zhengfeng Wang; Yanfei Li; Lufang Feng; Xiajing Chu; Nan Chen; Wence Zhou; Kehu Yang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Have we really understood when the efforts of laparoscopic liver resection are justified?-a complexity-based appraisal of the differential benefit.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Guido Fiorentini; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.265

Review 6.  Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Federica Cipriani; Francesca Ratti; Guido Fiorentini; Raffaella Reineke; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-22

7.  Development of a novel educational tool to assess skills in laparoscopic liver surgery using the Delphi methodology: the laparoscopic liver skills scale (LLSS).

Authors:  Théophile Guilbaud; David Fuks; Stéphane Berdah; David Jérémie Birnbaum; Laura Beyer Berjot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.