Literature DB >> 33615423

Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Federica Cipriani1, Francesca Ratti2, Guido Fiorentini2, Raffaella Reineke3, Luca Aldrighetti2,4.   

Abstract

Most surgeons have traditionally been reluctant toward minimally-invasive surgery for bile duct tumors. This study aimed to perform a systematic literature review on perioperative and oncologic results of pure laparoscopic and robotic curative-intent surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. According to the PRISMA statement, a systematic review was conducted into Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane. A critical appraisal of study was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Nineteen studies (12 on pure laparoscopy and 7 on robotics) were included: 7 case reports, 9 case series, 3 case-control (193 patients). The pooled conversion, morbidity, biliary leak and mortality rates were 5.5%, 43%, 16.4% and 4%. The weighted mean of operative time, blood loss and postoperative stay were 388 min, 446 mL and 14 days. For pure laparoscopy, the pooled R0 rate was 86%; overall survival and disease-free survival rates ranged from 85 to 100% and from 80 to 100% (median observation time 6-18 months). For robotic surgeries, the pooled R0 rate was 69% and overall survival rates ranged from 90 to 100% (median observation time 5-15 months). Case reports were overall of high quality, case series of moderate / high-quality, case-control studies ranged from low to high quality. In selected patients, minimally-invasive surgery for Klatskin tumors appears feasible, safe, satisfactory for perioperative outcomes and adequate for oncologic results. However, the results are based on few studies, limited in patient numbers and with allocation criteria more restrictive than open, reporting short follow-up and mainly with non-comparative design: evidence of higher quality is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Klatskin hilar cholangiocarcinoma; Laparoscopic liver resection; Minimally-invasive liver resection; Robot-assisted liver resection; Robotic liver resection

Year:  2021        PMID: 33615423     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01006-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  54 in total

Review 1.  Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey.

Authors:  Luca Aldrighetti; Giulio Belli; Luigi Boni; Umberto Cillo; Giuseppe Ettorre; Luciano De Carlis; Antonio Pinna; Luciano Casciola; Fulvio Calise
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases.

Authors:  F Cipriani; M Rawashdeh; L Stanton; T Armstrong; A Takhar; N W Pearce; J Primrose; M Abu Hilal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery: From Indication to Implementation.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Luca Aldrighetti; Ibrahim Dagher; Bjorn Edwin; Roberto Ivan Troisi; Ruslan Alikhanov; Somaiah Aroori; Giulio Belli; Marc Besselink; Javier Briceno; Brice Gayet; Mathieu D'Hondt; Mickael Lesurtel; Krishna Menon; Peter Lodge; Fernando Rotellar; Julio Santoyo; Olivier Scatton; Olivier Soubrane; Robert Sutcliffe; Ronald Van Dam; Steve White; Mark Christopher Halls; Federica Cipriani; Marcel Van der Poel; Ruben Ciria; Leonid Barkhatov; Yrene Gomez-Luque; Sira Ocana-Garcia; Andrew Cook; Joseph Buell; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Christos Dervenis; Giuseppe Fusai; David Geller; Hauke Lang; John Primrose; Mark Taylor; Thomas Van Gulik; Go Wakabayashi; Horacio Asbun; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Appraisal of disease-specific benefits of minimally invasiveness in surgery of breast cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Matteo Serenari; Matteo Zanello; Enrico Prosperi; Federica Cipriani; Giorgio Ercolani; Elio Jovine; Matteo Cescon; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Evolution of Laparoscopic Liver Surgery from Innovation to Implementation to Mastery: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes of 2,238 Patients from 4 European Specialized Centers.

Authors:  Giammauro Berardi; Stijn Van Cleven; Åsmund Avdem Fretland; Leonid Barkhatov; Mark Halls; Federica Cipriani; Luca Aldrighetti; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Bjørn Edwin; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Comparison of gastrojejunostomy techniques and anastomotic complications: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Steliana Fakas; Murad Elias; Derek Lim; Vadim Meytes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  M J van der Poel; L Barkhatov; D Fuks; G Berardi; F Cipriani; A Aljaiuossi; P Lainas; I Dagher; M D'Hondt; F Rotellar; M G Besselink; L Aldrighetti; R I Troisi; B Gayet; B Edwin; M Abu Hilal
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic versus open unisegmentectomy in two specialized centers. Feasibility and short-term results.

Authors:  Giovanni M Garbarino; Ugo Marchese; Romaric Tobome; Marc A Ward; Eric Vibert; Brice Gayet; Daniel Cherqui; David Fuks
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Curative Surgery and Ki-67 Value Rather Than Tumor Differentiation Predict the Survival of Patients With High-grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Daisuke Asano; Atsushi Kudo; Keiichi Akahoshi; Aya Maekawa; Yoshiki Murase; Kosuke Ogawa; Hiroaki Ono; Daisuke Ban; Shinji Tanaka; Minoru Tanabe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 13.787

10.  Robot-assisted versus open liver resection in the right posterior section.

Authors:  Alberto Patriti; Federica Cipriani; Francesca Ratti; Alberto Bartoli; Graziano Ceccarelli; Luciano Casciola; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current Perspectives on the Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  D Brock Hewitt; Zachary J Brown; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Renato Patrone; Francesco Izzo; Raffaele Palaia; Vincenza Granata; Guglielmo Nasti; Alessandro Ottaiano; Gilda Pasta; Andrea Belli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  The Implications of Treatment Delays in Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Matthew Parsons; Shane Lloyd; Skyler Johnson; Courtney Scaife; Heloisa Soares; Rebecca Kim; Robin Kim; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Randa Tao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 4.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery to treat hepatopancreatobiliary cancer: A technical review.

Authors:  Shu-Hung Chuang; Shih-Chang Chuang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.374

5.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Gang He; Wen Huang; Qian Ren; Jing Li; Feng-Xia Yang; Chang-Lin Deng; Li-Qi Li; Xue-Hui Peng; Yi-Chen Tang; Lu Zheng; Xiao-Bing Huang; Yu-Ming Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  The role of robotic surgery for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Brolese; Marta Rigoni; Alessio Pasquale; Giovanni Viel; Marco Brolese; Francesco Antonio Ciarleglio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.