| Literature DB >> 31118901 |
Jonathan H Massey1,2, Noriyoshi Akiyama3, Tanja Bien4,5, Klaus Dreisewerd4,5, Patricia J Wittkopp1,6, Joanne Y Yew7, Aya Takahashi3,8.
Abstract
Pleiotropic genes are genes that affect more than one trait. For example, many genes required for pigmentation in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster also affect traits such as circadian rhythms, vision, and mating behavior. Here, we present evidence that two pigmentation genes, ebony and tan, which encode enzymes catalyzing reciprocal reactions in the melanin biosynthesis pathway, also affect cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) composition in D. melanogaster females. More specifically, we report that ebony loss-of-function mutants have a CHC profile that is biased toward long (>25C) chain CHCs, whereas tan loss-of-function mutants have a CHC profile that is biased toward short (<25C) chain CHCs. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of dopamine synthesis, a key step in the melanin synthesis pathway, reversed the changes in CHC composition seen in ebony mutants, making the CHC profiles similar to those seen in tan mutants. These observations suggest that genetic variation affecting ebony and/or tan activity might cause correlated changes in pigmentation and CHC composition in natural populations. We tested this possibility using the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and found that CHC composition covaried with pigmentation as well as levels of ebony and tan expression in newly eclosed adults in a manner consistent with the ebony and tan mutant phenotypes. These data suggest that the pleiotropic effects of ebony and tan might contribute to covariation of pigmentation and CHC profiles in Drosophila.Entities:
Keywords: Drosophila; cuticular hydrocarbons; dopamine; ebony; pigmentation; pleiotropy; tan; trait covariation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31118901 PMCID: PMC6504824 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1ebony and tan affect pigmentation and CHC composition in female Drosophila melanogaster. (A) Insect sclerotization and pigmentation synthesis pathway. Ebony converts dopamine into N-β-alanyl dopamine (NBAD) which is oxidized into yellow-colored NBAD sclerotin. Tan catalyzes the reverse reaction, converting NBAD back into dopamine that can be oxidized into black and brown melanins. (B) Photographs highlighting the effects of ebony (darker) and tan (lighter) on body pigmentation compared to the un-injected vasa-Cas9 control line (WT). (C) Summary of ebony effects on total summed CHC classes relative to un-injected vasa-Cas9 control females. (D) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between ebony and un-injected vasa-Cas9 control flies. (E) Summary of tan effects on total summed CHC classes relative to w control females. For (D,E), each triangle represents a single replicate of CHCs extracted from five pooled individuals (N = 5 replicates per genotype). (F) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between tan and w control flies. Results of Tukey HSD post hoc tests following one-way ANOVA are shown: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
FIGURE 2Effects of pharmacological treatments on CHC lengthening in ebony and tan mutants. (A) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between ebony females fed 36 mM alpha methyl tyrosine (L-AMPT) and ebony females fed a solvent control. (B) Difference in log-contrast relative of CHC intensity between tan females fed 1 mM methyl L-DOPA hydrochloride (L-DOPA precursor) and tan females fed a solvent control. (C) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between tan females fed 10 mM L-DOPA precursor and tan females fed a solvent control.
FIGURE 3UV laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (UV-LDI MS) did not detect differences in short versus long CHCs between lightly and darkly pigmented cuticle. Female pannier-GAL4 flies were crossed to UAS-ebony-RNAi males to generate flies with a dark, heavily melanized stripe down the dorsal midline. (A) The UV-LDI MS lasers were targeted to light brown or dark black cuticle within the same fly (N = 3 biological replicates). (B) Difference in relative CHC intensity between black and brown cuticle.
FIGURE 4Abdominal pigmentation co-varies with CHC length profiles in the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP). Pigmentation scores and CHC data were obtained from Dembeck et al. (2015a,b). (A) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with darkly pigmented fifth abdominal tergites (A5) (1.5 < score, N = 53) and the 155 line average. (B) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with intermediately pigmented A5 (1 < score ≤ 1.5, N = 56) and the 155 line average. (C) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with lightly pigmented A5 (score ≤ 1, N = 49) and the 155 line average.
FIGURE 5Variation in ebony and tan expression co-varies with CHC length profiles in the DGRP. CHC data was obtained from Dembeck et al. (2015b), and ebony and tan expression was quantified via qRT-PCR for 23 DGRP lines. (A) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with low ebony expression and the 23 line average. (B) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with intermediate ebony expression and the 23 line average. (C) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with low ebony expression and the 23 line average. (D) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with low tan expression and the 23 line average. (E) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with intermediate tan expression and the 23 line average. (F) Difference in log-contrast of relative CHC intensity between DGRP females with high tan expression and the 23 line average.