Patrycja Krzyżanowska-Berkowska1, Karolina Czajor1, Piotr Syga2, D Robert Iskander3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Wroclaw Medical University , Wroclaw , Poland. 2. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology , Wroclaw , Poland. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology , Wroclaw , Poland.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the lamina cribrosa depth and shape parameters in glaucoma suspects compared to glaucoma patients and healthy controls. Materials and Methods: A total of 325 subjects (120 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 103 glaucoma suspects and 102 healthy controls) were included. Serial horizontal B-scan images of optic nerve head were obtained using enhanced depth imaging of the optical coherence tomography. For each of the 325 subjects, lamina cribrosa position was measured manually in 16 horizontal B-scans, hence 5200 scans in total were analyzed. In particular, lamina cribrosa depth (LCD), lamina cribrosa deflection depth (LCDD), lamina cribrosa shape index (LCSI), and its horizontal equivalent (LCSIH) were estimated. Along lamina cribrosa parameterization, intraocular pressure, visual field, central retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and disc and neuroretinal rim areas were also measured. Results: LCD was statistically significant different (P < .001) in glaucoma patients when compared to glaucoma suspects and heathy controls (603 ± 172 μm versus 554 ± 114 μm and 531 ± 115 μm, respectively). Similarly, LCDD was statistically significant different (P < .001) in glaucoma patients when compared to glaucoma suspects and heathy controls (250 ± 78 μm versus 213 ± 54 μm and 211 ± 58 μm, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found in LCSI (P = .957). However, LCSIH showed statistically significant differences between healthy controls and glaucoma suspects (P = .003) and between healthy controls and glaucoma patients (P = .006). Conclusions: The deformation of LC in glaucoma suspects, in terms of LCSIH, was not statistically different from that of glaucoma patients. LCD does not have the potential to discriminate glaucoma suspects from healthy controls.
Purpose: To evaluate the lamina cribrosa depth and shape parameters in glaucoma suspects compared to glaucomapatients and healthy controls. Materials and Methods: A total of 325 subjects (120 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 103 glaucoma suspects and 102 healthy controls) were included. Serial horizontal B-scan images of optic nerve head were obtained using enhanced depth imaging of the optical coherence tomography. For each of the 325 subjects, lamina cribrosa position was measured manually in 16 horizontal B-scans, hence 5200 scans in total were analyzed. In particular, lamina cribrosa depth (LCD), lamina cribrosa deflection depth (LCDD), lamina cribrosa shape index (LCSI), and its horizontal equivalent (LCSIH) were estimated. Along lamina cribrosa parameterization, intraocular pressure, visual field, central retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and disc and neuroretinal rim areas were also measured. Results:LCD was statistically significant different (P < .001) in glaucomapatients when compared to glaucoma suspects and heathy controls (603 ± 172 μm versus 554 ± 114 μm and 531 ± 115 μm, respectively). Similarly, LCDD was statistically significant different (P < .001) in glaucomapatients when compared to glaucoma suspects and heathy controls (250 ± 78 μm versus 213 ± 54 μm and 211 ± 58 μm, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found in LCSI (P = .957). However, LCSIH showed statistically significant differences between healthy controls and glaucoma suspects (P = .003) and between healthy controls and glaucomapatients (P = .006). Conclusions: The deformation of LC in glaucoma suspects, in terms of LCSIH, was not statistically different from that of glaucomapatients. LCD does not have the potential to discriminate glaucoma suspects from healthy controls.
Authors: Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Daniel Gonzalez-Hernandez; Daniel Perez-Barbudo; Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2022-06
Authors: Rafael Grytz; Mustapha El Hamdaoui; Preston A Fuchs; Massimo A Fazio; Ryan P McNabb; Anthony N Kuo; Christopher A Girkin; Brian C Samuels Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 3.562
Authors: Jessica V Jasien; Massimo A Fazio; Brian C Samuels; James M Johnston; J Crawford Downs Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 3.283