Kevin Campbell1, Derek Shyr1, Rochelle Bagatell2, Matthias Fischer3, Akira Nakagawara4, Adela Canete Nieto5, Garrett M Brodeur2, Katherine K Matthay6, Wendy B London1, Steven G DuBois1. 1. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospital and Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany. 4. SAGA Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Tosu (HIMAT) Foundation, Tosu, Japan. 5. Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain. 6. UCSF School of Medicine and UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MYCN amplification (MYCN-A) is an established adverse prognostic factor in neuroblastoma. The extent to which the prognostic impact of MYCN-A depends on other factors has not been fully characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group database, we constructed Cox models of overall survival (OS) to obtain hazard ratios of the effect of MYCN-A within subgroups defined by other prognostic factors. Cox models assessed the degree to which the prognostic impact of MYCN-A was modulated by each other covariate. We used absolute hazard ratio (HR) differences to construct classification trees to identify subgroups with greatest differential prognostic effect of MYCN-A. RESULTS: In a cohort of 6223 patients with known MYCN status, the OS hazard ratio associated with MYCN-A was 6.3 (95% confidence interval 5.7-7.0, P < .001). Age at diagnosis conferred the largest HR absolute difference for MYCN-A between subgroups (HR absolute difference 16.6; HRs for MYCN-A of 19.6 for <18 months, 3.0 for ≥18 months). MYCN-A remained significantly prognostic of OS after controlling for other factors, abrogating their prognostic strength. Patients whose outcome was most impacted by MYCN status were those who were <18 months, had high mitosis karrhyohexis index (MKI) and low ferritin. CONCLUSION: The prognostic strength of MYCN-A varies depending on which patient subgroup defined by other neuroblastoma risk factors is examined, with greatest strength in patients with otherwise favorable features. MYCN-A has little effect within some subgroups, aiding clinical decision-making if MYCN status cannot be assessed. Subgroups where MYCN-A has large effect may be prioritized for agents targeting Myc family proteins.
BACKGROUND:MYCN amplification (MYCN-A) is an established adverse prognostic factor in neuroblastoma. The extent to which the prognostic impact of MYCN-A depends on other factors has not been fully characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group database, we constructed Cox models of overall survival (OS) to obtain hazard ratios of the effect of MYCN-A within subgroups defined by other prognostic factors. Cox models assessed the degree to which the prognostic impact of MYCN-A was modulated by each other covariate. We used absolute hazard ratio (HR) differences to construct classification trees to identify subgroups with greatest differential prognostic effect of MYCN-A. RESULTS: In a cohort of 6223 patients with known MYCN status, the OS hazard ratio associated with MYCN-A was 6.3 (95% confidence interval 5.7-7.0, P < .001). Age at diagnosis conferred the largest HR absolute difference for MYCN-A between subgroups (HR absolute difference 16.6; HRs for MYCN-A of 19.6 for <18 months, 3.0 for ≥18 months). MYCN-A remained significantly prognostic of OS after controlling for other factors, abrogating their prognostic strength. Patients whose outcome was most impacted by MYCN status were those who were <18 months, had high mitosis karrhyohexis index (MKI) and low ferritin. CONCLUSION: The prognostic strength of MYCN-A varies depending on which patient subgroup defined by other neuroblastoma risk factors is examined, with greatest strength in patients with otherwise favorable features. MYCN-A has little effect within some subgroups, aiding clinical decision-making if MYCN status cannot be assessed. Subgroups where MYCN-A has large effect may be prioritized for agents targeting Myc family proteins.
Authors: Kaiming Sun; Ruzanna Atoyan; Mylissa A Borek; Steven Dellarocca; Maria Elena S Samson; Anna W Ma; Guang-Xin Xu; Troy Patterson; David P Tuck; Jaye L Viner; Ali Fattaey; Jing Wang Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: S Goto; S Umehara; R B Gerbing; D O Stram; G M Brodeur; R C Seeger; J N Lukens; K K Matthay; H Shimada Journal: Cancer Date: 2001-11-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: G P Tonini; L Boni; A Pession; D Rogers; A Iolascon; G Basso; L Cordero di Montezemolo; F Casale; A Pession; P Perri; K Mazzocco; P Scaruffi; C Lo Cunsolo; N Marchese; C Milanaccio; M Conte; P Bruzzi; B De Bernardi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Daria Thompson; Kieuhoa T Vo; Wendy B London; Matthias Fischer; Peter F Ambros; Akira Nakagawara; Garrett M Brodeur; Katherine K Matthay; Steven G DuBois Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrea Di Cataldo; Daniela Dau; Massimo Conte; Stefano Parodi; Bruno De Bernardi; Maria Giuliano; Andrea Pession; Elisabetta Viscardi; Roberto Luksch; Aurora Castellano; Gregoria Bertuna; Riccardo Haupt Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2009-01
Authors: Daniel A Morgenstern; Ulrike Pötschger; Lucas Moreno; Vassilios Papadakis; Cormac Owens; Shifra Ash; Claudia Pasqualini; Roberto Luksch; Alberto Garaventa; Adela Canete; Martin Elliot; Aleksandra Wieczorek; Geneviève Laureys; Per Kogner; Josef Malis; Ellen Ruud; Maja Beck-Popovic; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Dominique Valteau-Couanet; Ruth Ladenstein Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: P F Ambros; I M Ambros; G M Brodeur; M Haber; J Khan; A Nakagawara; G Schleiermacher; F Speleman; R Spitz; W B London; S L Cohn; A D J Pearson; J M Maris Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Kevin Campbell; Arlene Naranjo; Emily Hibbitts; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Rochelle Bagatell; Meredith S Irwin; Hiroyuki Shimada; Michael Hogarty; Julie R Park; Steven G DuBois Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2020-05-31 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Abeer Al-Battashi; Ameera Al-Rahbi; Abdulhakeem Al-Rawahi; Mohammed Mamdouh; Ibrahim Al-Ghaithi; Fatma A Ramadhan Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2021-11-25