| Literature DB >> 32896084 |
Yan Su1, Lijun Wang2, Qian Zhao1, Zhixia Yue1, Wen Zhao1, Xisi Wang1, Chao Duan1, Mei Jin1, Dawei Zhang1, Shenglan Chen3, Jianfeng Yin3, Lihua Qiu2, Xianfeng Cheng2, Zhong Xu2, Xiaoli Ma1.
Abstract
Detection of amplification of the MYCN gene is essential for determining optimal treatment and estimating prognosis of patients with neuroblastoma (NB). DNA FISH with neuroblastoma tissues or patient-derived bone marrow cells is the standard clinical practice for the detection of MYCN amplification. As tumor cells may often be unavailable, we developed a method to detect MYCN amplification in the plasma of patients with neuroblastoma. Taking single-copy NAGK DNA as reference, we used real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to determine the MYCN/NAGK ratio in the plasma of 115 patients diagnosed with NB. An increased MYCN/NAGK ratio in the plasma was consistent with MYCN amplification as assessed by DNA FISH. The AUC for a MYCN/NAGK ratio equal to 6.965 was 0.943, with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Beyond the threshold of 6.965, the MYCN/NAGK ratio correlated with a heavier tumor burden. Event-free and overall survival of two years were significantly shortened in stage 4 patients with a MYCN/NAGK ratio higher than 6.965. Plasma MYCN/NAGK ratios increased in patients with progressive disease and relapse. Thus, we conclude that the determination of the plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio by qPCR is a noninvasive and reproducible method to measure MYCN amplification in patients with NB.Entities:
Keywords: MYCN amplification; MYCN/NAGK ratio; neuroblastoma; plasma; qPCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32896084 PMCID: PMC7607162 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Oncol ISSN: 1574-7891 Impact factor: 7.449
Demographic and clinical features of patients with newly diagnosed NB. Amp, amplification; Nonamp, nonamplification; NSE, neuron‐specific enolase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; P: chi‐square test.
| Characters | Total |
| % |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amp | Nonamp | % of Amp | |||||
| Gender | Male | 59 | 51.30 | 25 | 34 | 42.37 |
|
| Female | 56 | 48.70 | 12 | 44 | 21.43 | ||
| Age (months) | < 18 | 17 | 14.78 | 6 | 11 | 35.29 | > 0.05 |
| ≥ 18 and ≤ 60 | 74 | 64.35 | 24 | 50 | 32.43 | ||
| > 60 | 24 | 20.87 | 7 | 17 | 29.17 | ||
| Primary site | Abdomen | 96 | 83.48 | 37 | 59 | 38.54 |
|
| Thorax and other | 19 | 16.52 | 0 | 19 | 0.00 | ||
| NSE (ng·mL−1) | < 370 | 68 | 59.13 | 11 | 57 | 16.18 |
|
| ≥ 370 | 47 | 40.87 | 26 | 21 | 55.32 | ||
| LDH (IU·L−1) | < 500 | 42 | 36.52 | 4 | 38 | 9.52 |
|
| ≥ 500 and < 1500 | 42 | 36.52 | 8 | 34 | 19.05 | ||
| ≥ 1500 | 31 | 26.96 | 25 | 6 | 80.65 | ||
| Metastasis sites | < 3 | 65 | 56.52 | 15 | 50 | 23.08 | > 0.05 |
| 3 | 30 | 26.09 | 12 | 18 | 40.00 | ||
| > 3 | 20 | 17.39 | 10 | 10 | 50.00 | ||
Values in bold highlight the statistical significance with P value less than 0.05 or 0.01.
High plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio predicting MYCN amplification status of tumor.
| Character | Subgroup |
| Plasma |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FISH‐ | Amp | 37 | 69.07 (53.39, 142.50) |
|
| Nonamp | 68 | 1.27 (1.00, 1.53) | ||
| Gender | Male | 59 | 1.73 (1.30,4.53) | > 0.05 |
| Female | 56 | 1.55 (1.25,1.78) | ||
| Age (months) | < 18 | 17 | 1.71 (0.9, 53.39) | > 0.05 |
| ≥ 18 and ≤ 60 | 74 | 1.57 (1.37, 2.21) | ||
| > 60 | 24 | 1.59 (0.91, 4.53) | ||
| Primary site | Abdomen | 96 | 1.60 (1.37, 2.63) | > 0.05 |
| Thorax and other | 19 | 1.56 (0.89, 1.83) | ||
| NSE (ng·mL−1) | < 370 | 68 | 1.32 (1.00, 1.57) |
|
| ≥ 370 | 47 | 26.17 (1.71, 60.76) | ||
| LDH (IU·L−1) | < 500 | 42 | 1.13 (0.89,1.54) |
|
| ≥ 500 and < 1500 | 42 | 1.54 (1.30,1.73) | ||
| ≥ 1500 | 31 | 81.43 (40.74,149.60) | ||
| Metastasis sites | < 3 | 65 | 1.53 (1.12, 1.71) |
|
| 3 | 30 | 2.47 (1.44, 44.26) | ||
| > 3 | 20 | 5.29 (1.25, 40.74) |
Mann–Whitney U‐test.
Kruskal–Wallis test.
Fig. 1Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the predictive value of plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio for NB at the time of diagnosis. The plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio for optimal sensitivity and specificity and the AUC are indicated.
Event‐free survival time in patients of stage 4 during two years. P: Mantel–Cox test.
|
|
| Events | Event‐free | Events % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (> 6.965) | 30 | 13 | 17 | 43.33 |
|
| Low (≤ 6.965) | 63 | 15 | 48 | 23.81 |
Fig. 2The Kaplan–Meier curve of event‐free survival time in two years. Event‐free curves for patients with plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio > 6.965 vs those ≤ 6.965.
Overall survival time in patients of stage 4 during two years. p: Mantel–Cox test.
|
|
| Mortality | Live | Mortality % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High (> 6.965) | 30 | 10 | 20 | 33.33 |
|
| Low (≤ 6.965) | 63 | 4 | 59 | 6.35 |
Fig. 3The Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival time in two years. Overall survival curves for patients with plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio > 6.965 vs those ≤ 6.965.
Fig. 4Changes of plasma MYCN/NAGK ratio of four patients with MYCN amplification during two years. (A–C) patients 3, 14, and 19 with event; (D) patient 15 with remission.