C A Gomez-Roca1, A Italiano2, C Le Tourneau3, P A Cassier4, M Toulmonde5, S P D'Angelo6, M Campone7, K L Weber8, D Loirat9, M A Cannarile10, A-M Jegg10, C Ries10, R Christen11, G Meneses-Lorente12, W Jacob10, I Klaman10, C-H Ooi11, C Watson13, K Wonde11, B Reis11, F Michielin11, D Rüttinger10, J-P Delord9, J-Y Blay14. 1. Department of Medicine & Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-Oncopole), Toulouse. Electronic address: gomez-roca.carlos@iuct-oncopole.fr. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux. Electronic address: a.italiano@bordeaux.unicancer.fr. 3. Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud; INSERM U900 Research Unit, Saint-Cloud; Paris-Saclay University, Paris. 4. Department of Medicine, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux. 6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA. 7. ICO René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France. 8. Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Penn Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA. 9. Department of Drug Development and Innovation, Institut Curie, Paris & Saint-Cloud. 10. Roche Innovation Center Munich, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Penzberg, Germany. 11. Licensing and Early Development (LEAD) Safety Science, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 12. Roche Innovation Center Welwyn, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Welwyn Garden City. 13. A4P Consulting Ltd, Sandwich, UK. 14. Department of Medicine & Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-Oncopole), Toulouse.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emactuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor and targets tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This study assessed the safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emactuzumab, as monotherapy and in combination with paclitaxel, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, phase Ia/b study comprised two parts (dose escalation and dose expansion), each containing two arms (emactuzumab, every 2 or 3 weeks, as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly). The dose-escalation part explored the maximum tolerated dose and optimal biological dose (OBD). The dose-expansion part extended the safety assessment and investigated the objective response rate. A PK/PD analysis of serial blood, skin and tumor biopsies was used to explore proof of mechanism and confirm the OBD. RESULTS: No maximum tolerated dose was reached in either study arm, and the safety profile of emactuzumab alone and in combination does not appear to preclude its use. No patients receiving emactuzumab monotherapy showed an objective response; the objective response rate for emactuzumab in combination with paclitaxel was 7% across all doses. Skin macrophages rather than peripheral blood monocytes or circulating colony-stimulating factor-1 were identified as an optimal surrogate PD marker to select the OBD. Emactuzumab treatment alone and in combination with paclitaxel resulted in a plateau of immunosuppressive TAM reduction at the OBD of 1000 mg administered every 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Emactuzumab showed specific reduction of immunosuppressive TAMs at the OBD in both treatment arms but did not result in clinically relevant antitumor activity alone or in combination with paclitaxel. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01494688).
BACKGROUND: Emactuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against the colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor and targets tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This study assessed the safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emactuzumab, as monotherapy and in combination with paclitaxel, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, phase Ia/b study comprised two parts (dose escalation and dose expansion), each containing two arms (emactuzumab, every 2 or 3 weeks, as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly). The dose-escalation part explored the maximum tolerated dose and optimal biological dose (OBD). The dose-expansion part extended the safety assessment and investigated the objective response rate. A PK/PD analysis of serial blood, skin and tumor biopsies was used to explore proof of mechanism and confirm the OBD. RESULTS: No maximum tolerated dose was reached in either study arm, and the safety profile of emactuzumab alone and in combination does not appear to preclude its use. No patients receiving emactuzumab monotherapy showed an objective response; the objective response rate for emactuzumab in combination with paclitaxel was 7% across all doses. Skin macrophages rather than peripheral blood monocytes or circulating colony-stimulating factor-1 were identified as an optimal surrogate PD marker to select the OBD. Emactuzumab treatment alone and in combination with paclitaxel resulted in a plateau of immunosuppressive TAM reduction at the OBD of 1000 mg administered every 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Emactuzumab showed specific reduction of immunosuppressive TAMs at the OBD in both treatment arms but did not result in clinically relevant antitumor activity alone or in combination with paclitaxel. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01494688).
Authors: A R Abbas; D Baldwin; Y Ma; W Ouyang; A Gurney; F Martin; S Fong; M van Lookeren Campagne; P Godowski; P M Williams; A C Chan; H F Clark Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.676
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Itay Tirosh; Benjamin Izar; Sanjay M Prakadan; Marc H Wadsworth; Daniel Treacy; John J Trombetta; Asaf Rotem; Christopher Rodman; Christine Lian; George Murphy; Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani; Ken Dutton-Regester; Jia-Ren Lin; Ofir Cohen; Parin Shah; Diana Lu; Alex S Genshaft; Travis K Hughes; Carly G K Ziegler; Samuel W Kazer; Aleth Gaillard; Kellie E Kolb; Alexandra-Chloé Villani; Cory M Johannessen; Aleksandr Y Andreev; Eliezer M Van Allen; Monica Bertagnolli; Peter K Sorger; Ryan J Sullivan; Keith T Flaherty; Dennie T Frederick; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Charles H Yoon; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Alex K Shalek; Aviv Regev; Levi A Garraway Journal: Science Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael A Cannarile; Martin Weisser; Wolfgang Jacob; Anna-Maria Jegg; Carola H Ries; Dominik Rüttinger Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Claire E Olingy; Cheryl L San Emeterio; Molly E Ogle; Jack R Krieger; Anthony C Bruce; David D Pfau; Brett T Jordan; Shayn M Peirce; Edward A Botchwey Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Khatora S Opperman; Kate Vandyke; Peter J Psaltis; Jacqueline E Noll; Andrew C W Zannettino Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Gerald S Falchook; Marc Peeters; Sylvie Rottey; Luc Y Dirix; Radka Obermannova; Jonathan E Cohen; Ruth Perets; Ronnie Shapira Frommer; Todd M Bauer; Judy S Wang; Richard D Carvajal; Joshua Sabari; Sonya Chapman; Wei Zhang; Boris Calderon; Daniel A Peterson Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Anita K Mehta; Sapana Kadel; Madeline G Townsend; Madisson Oliwa; Jennifer L Guerriero Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Sarah A O'Brien; Jessica Orf; Katarzyna M Skrzypczynska; Hong Tan; Jennie Kim; Jason DeVoss; Brian Belmontes; Jackson G Egen Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 6.968