Literature DB >> 31114647

Indications and Surgical Techniques for Corneal Transplantation at a Tertiary Referral Center.

Hossein Jamali1, Ahmad Reza Gholampour1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aimed to review the indications and techniques for corneal transplantation at a tertiary referral center over a 5-year period.
METHODS: Records of patients who underwent corneal transplantation at Khalili Medical Center, Shiraz, Iran from September, 2012 to September, 2017 were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 1149 eyes of 956 patients underwent corneal transplantation. The most common indication was infectious corneal ulcers (n = 296, 25.8%), followed by keratoconus (n = 243, 21.1%), bullous keratopathy (n = 219, 19.1%), failed grafts (n = 117, 10.2%), non-herpetic corneal scars (n = 113, 9.8%), corneal stromal dystrophies (n = 33, 2.9%), pellucid marginal degeneration (n = 31, 2.7%), and trauma (n = 26, 2.3%); other indications included thin descemetocele, post-herpetic corneal scar, endothelial corneal dystrophies, anterior segment dysgenesis, corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis, and corneal fibrosis. Corneal transplantation techniques included penetrating keratoplasty (PKP, n = 789, 68.7%), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK, n = 187, 16.3%), Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (n = 171, 14.9%), and keratolimbal allograft (n = 2, 0.1%) in descending order. In children (aged ≤18 years), the most common indication was keratoconus (n = 32, 41.6%), and the most common technique was PKP (n = 50, 64.9%). In patients aged 19-27 years, the most common indication was keratoconus (n = 89, 64.5%), and the most common technique was PKP (n = 75, 54.4%).
CONCLUSION: Infectious corneal ulcer was the most common indication, and PKP was the most prevalent technique in patients undergoing corneal transplantation. DALK was an emerging alternative surgical treatment in patients with corneal disorders in which corneal endothelium is spared.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal Transplantation; Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty; Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty; Penetrating Keratoplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 31114647      PMCID: PMC6504724          DOI: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_92_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res        ISSN: 2008-322X


INTRODUCTION

Corneal blindness due to infection, ectasia, corneal dystrophy, or other pathology is a major health problem worldwide.[1] Indications for corneal transplantation have changed overtime and differ based on location such as the city and country; moreover, allocation of resources is based on the epidemiology of corneal pathologies in each region. For example, bullous keratopathy is reported to be the most common indication for corneal transplantation in developed countries,[234567] and infectious corneal diseases and corneal scars are more prevalent in developing countries.[8910] Certain indications for penetrating keratoplasty have changed over time in Iran.[11] In this study, we reviewed the indications and techniques of corneal transplantation performed over a 5-year period at Khalili Medical Eye Center, a tertiary training and referral eye center in Shiraz, Iran.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the hospital records of patients who had undergone corneal transplantation at Khalili Medical Eye Center from September, 2012 to September, 2017 for demographic data, indications for keratoplasty, and surgical techniques. Indications for keratoplasty consisted of the surgeons' clinical diagnoses at the time of surgery. In case of multiple transplantations, diagnosis of regraft was considered regardless of the initial indication for transplantation and type of keratoplasty. In this study, corneal opacification referred to non-herpetic corneal scar in the absence of active bacterial or viral infection; whereas, old corneal scars with confirmed diagnosis of herpes simplex keratitis based on the history and characteristic clinical features were reported separately. The causes of active infectious corneal ulcers were determined through clinical findings, confocal biomicroscopy, smears, cultures, and/or histopathologic examinations performed through corneal biopsy. Thin descemetocele referred to non-traumatic and non-surgical corneal thinning in the absence of active infection. Corneal fibrosis referred to old trachoma with corneal fibrosis. Endothelial corneal dystrophies comprised Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Traumatic corneal opacity referred to any corneal opacities caused by mechanical trauma or chemical burns. Aphakic or pseudophakic patients who underwent keratoplasty for corneal decompensation were considered as cases of aphakic bullous keratopathy (ABK) or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK), regardless of the underlying mechanism of corneal decompensation (e.g. complicated cataract surgery). In case of tectonic or therapeutic corneal transplantation performed for ulceration or perforation, the primary pathology leading to an urgent keratoplasty was considered. The indications for keratoplasty and surgical techniques performed in patients aged ≤18 years and those aged 19-27 years were separately investigated and reported.

RESULTS

Overall, the records of 1149 eyes of 956 patients including 588 male and 368 female subjects who underwent corneal transplantation during the 5-year period were compiled. Mean age was 51.47 ± 23. 12 years (age range, 10 days to 99 years) with median of 49 years. Of 1149 eyes, 77 eyes were from 49 children (aged ≤18 years), and 138 eyes from 120 patients (aged 19-27 years). Patients with anterior segment dysgenesis (Peter's anomaly) were the youngest (mean age, 1 year) and subjects with bullous keratoplasty (BK) were the oldest (mean age, 68 years). The most common indication for keratoplasty was infectious corneal ulcers (n = 296, 25.8%) The second most common indication for keratoplasty was keratoconus (n = 243, 21.1%), followed by bullous keratopathy (n = 219, 19.1%), failed graft (n = 117, 10.2%), non-herpetic corneal scar (n = 113, 9.8%), corneal stromal dystrophies (n = 33, 2.9%), pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) (n = 31, 2.7%), traumatic corneal opacities (n = 26, 2.3%), thin descemetocele (n = 22, 1.9%), and post-herpetic corneal scar (n = 21, 1.8%); the remaining indications included endothelial corneal dystrophies, post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) keratectasia, corneal fibrosis, and anterior segment dysgenesis [Tables 1–8].
Table 1

Types of corneal transplantation

FrequencyPercentage
PKP78968.7
DALK18716.3
DSAEK17114.9
KLAL20.2
Total1149100.0

DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

Table 8

Bullous keratopathy

TypePKPDSEAKTotal
PBK70142212
ABK707
Total77142219

ABK, aphakic bullous keratopathy; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; PBK, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

Types of corneal transplantation DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty Indications of corneal transplantation LASIK, laser in-situ keratomileusis; PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration Types of corneal transplantation under different indications DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; LASIK; laser in-situ keratomileusis; PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty Indications of corneal transplantation DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; LASIK; laser in-situ keratomileusis; PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty Types of penetrating keratoplasty PKP, penetrating keratoplasty Endothelial corneal dystrophies CHED, congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; FED, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty Trauma PKP, penetrating keratoplasty Bullous keratopathy ABK, aphakic bullous keratopathy; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; PBK, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty In children, the indications for corneal transplantation included keratoconus (n = 32), infectious corneal ulcer (n = 12), failed graft (n = 9), non-herpetic corneal scar (n = 6), post herpetic corneal scar (n = 6), anterior segment dysgenesis (n = 6), traumatic corneal opacities (n = 4), endothelial corneal dystrophies (n = 1), and stromal corneal dystrophies (n = 1) [Tables 9 and 10].
Table 9

Types of corneal transplantation by age group

FrequencyPercentage
≤18 years
 PKP5064.9
 DALK2431.2
 DSAEK33.9
 Total77100.0
19-27 years
 PKP7554.3
 DALK6345.6
 Total138100
>27 years
 PKP73968.9
 DALK16315.2
 DSAEK16815.7
 KLAL20.2
 Total1072100.0

DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty.

Table 10

Indications of corneal transplantation by age group

FrequencyPercentage
≤18 years
 Keratoconus3241.6
 Infectious corneal ulcers1215.6
 Non-herpetic corneal scar67.8
 Failed graft911.7
 Corneal stromal dystrophies11.3
 Endothelial corneal dystrophies11.3
 Post-herpetic corneal scar67.8
 Trauma45.2
 Anterior segment dysgenesis67.8
 Total77100.0
19-27 years
 Keratoconus8964.5
 Infectious corneal ulcers139.4
 Bullous keratopathy21.4
 PMD21.4
 Failed graft75.1
 Endothelial corneal dystrophies32.1
 Stromal corneal dystrophies128.8
 Non-herpetic corneal scar21.4
 Trauma53.6
 Post-herpetic corneal scar10.7
 Thin descemetocele10.7
 Post-LASIK keratectasia10.7
 Total138100
>27 years
 Keratoconus21119.7
 Infection corneal ulcers28426.5
 Bullous keratopathy21920.4
 Non-herpetic corneal scar10710.0
 PMD312.9
 Fail graft10810.1
 Corneal stromal dystrophies323.0
 Endothelial corneal dystrophies151.4
 Post-herpetic corneal scar151.4
 Trauma222.1
 Thin descemetocele222.1
 Corneal Fibrosis30.3
 Post-LASIK keratectasia30.3
 Total1072100.0

PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration; LASIK, laser in-situ keratomileusis

Types of corneal transplantation by age group DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty. Indications of corneal transplantation by age group PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration; LASIK, laser in-situ keratomileusis In the 19 to 27 years' age group, the indications for corneal transplantation included keratoconus (n = 89), infectious corneal ulcers (n = 13), stromal corneal dystrophies (n = 12), failed graft (n = 7), traumatic corneal opacities (n = 5), endothelial corneal dystrophies (n = 3), PMD (n = 2), BK (n = 2), non-herpetic corneal scar (n = 2), post-herpetic corneal scar (n = 1), thin descemetocele (n = 1), and post-LASIK keratectasia (n = 1) [Table 10]. Of 296 eyes that received a corneal graft for the management of infectious corneal ulcers, 49 eyes were culture positive; of these, 44 eyes had bacterial infection, and 5 eyes had fungal infection. The remaining cultures were negative for growth based on the laboratory report. Macular corneal dystrophy was the most common stromal dystrophy as indication for corneal transplantation, followed by granular and lattice corneal dystrophies. In this study, corneal transplantation techniques included penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) (n = 789, 68.7%), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) (n = 187, 16.3%), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) (n = 171, 14.9%), and keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) (n = 2, 0.2%) [Table 1]. The most common techniques in children was PKP (n = 50), followed by DALK (n = 24), and DSAEK (n = 3); in the 19-27 years' age group, PKP (n = 75), followed by DALK (n = 63). With regard to surgical techniques for management of keratoconus during the 5-year period, there was relative reduction in the frequency of patients undergoing PKP, whereas increase in the frequency of those undergoing DALK. PKP was the dominant technique for surgical management of infectious corneal ulcer, failed graft and corneal scars.

DISCUSSION

The current study was conducted in one of the hospitals affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, which attends patients from around the country, especially southern Iran. The study results reflected recent changes in indications for corneal transplantation and surgical techniques in Iran; however, patient selection may have bias due to presentation of challenging and complicated cases that are not routinely managed in private and less specialized centers. In our study, infectious corneal ulcer was the most common indication over the 5-year study period. Similarly, in some countries, such as India and China, corneal infections were the leading cause of keretatoplasty.[81012] The reason for this finding is that our center is a primary center, and secondary and tertiary referral center in southern Iran for patients with corneal ulcers. The prevalence of infectious corneal ulcers in Iran has not been reported previously. However, we observed relatively high prevalence rates possibly due to the association between infectious corneal ulcers and the climatic condition in southern Iran, patients' socioeconomic level, education level, safety at work place, prevalence of ocular surface diseases in this region, and ophthalmic medication abuse; moreover, the time interval between screening, diagnosis, and management can affect the prevalence of corneal transplantation in patients with infectious corneal ulcers in Iran. Reduced prevalence of corneal transplantation in patients with keratoconus may be due to the increased rate of CXL procedure in patients with early diagnosis of keratoconus. In our center, the frequency of CXL gradually increased from 29 patients in 2010 to 412 patients in 2017, which may be the reason for reduced frequency of corneal transplantation under indication of keratoconus, the second most common indication for corneal transplantation in our study. Another reason for this decline may be that private centers which manage patients with keratoconus have access to donated corneas in the Eye Banks, leading to early operation, especially DALK which has recently gained resurgence; whereas, patients with infectious corneal ulcers are referred to our center. Studies conducted in western countries reported that FED was as an important indication, with a rate of 9.3% to 23.2%.[6] However, the present study revealed that FED was a rare condition, with a prevalence rate of 1.1%, similar to reports from studies conducted in the Middle East and Mediterranean region.[1314] Kanavi et al[15] reported the indications of PKP nationwide in Iran from 1997 to 2003; their results revealed that keratoconus was the most common indication, followed by corneal opacities and scars, PBK, corneal dystrophies, ABK, and re-graft in descending order. Zare et al,[11] reported that the leading indication for corneal transplantation in a tertiary referral center from 2004 to 2007 was keratoconus, but bullous keratopathy was the second most common indication, followed by non-herpetic corneal scar and infectious corneal ulcers. In the current study, macular corneal dystrophy was the most common dystrophy with indication for corneal transplantation, which is in agreement with the report of Kanavi et al[15] and Zare et al.[11] As compared to previous reports from Iran,[11] we observed that infectious corneal ulcers showed increased incidence attaining the rank of most common indication from that of fourth most common, followed by keratoconus and bullous keratopathy. In our study, PKP was the most common technique of corneal transplantation (68.7%), followed by DALK (16.3%) and DSAEK (14.9%). However, there was an alteration in the relative frequency of surgical technique in patients with keratoconus over the 5-year period, reflecting the introduction of new corneal transplantation techniques that address the underlying pathology. In our center, DALK using either the Anwar big-bubble or Melles technique is used exclusively. Other techniques included tectonic graft [Table 4].
Table 4

Indications of corneal transplantation

FrequencyPercentage
Keratoconus
 PKP8535.0
 DALK15865.0
 Total243100.0
Infectious corneal ulcers
 PKP296100.0
Bullous keratopathy
 PKP7735.2
 DSAEK14264.8
 Total219100.0
Non-herpetic corneal scar
 PKP10693.8
 DALK43.5
 DSAEK32.7
 Total113100.0
PMD
 PKP1961.3
 DALK1238.7
 Total31100.0
Failed graft
 PKP9480.3
 DALK21.7
 DSAEK2017.1
 KLAL10.9
 Total117100.0
Corneal stromal dystrophies
 PKP2781.8
 DALK618.2
 Total33100.0
Endothelial corneal dystrophies
 PKP1062.5
 DSAEK637.5
 Total16100.0
Post-herpetic corneal scar
 PKP1781.0
 DALK419.0
 Total21100.0
Trauma
 PKP2596.2
 KLAL13.8
 Total26100.0
Thin descemetocele
 PKP22100.0
 Corneal Fibrosis
 PKP3100.0
Post-LASIK keratectasia
 PKP266.7
 DALK133.3
 Total3100.0
Anterior segment dysgenesis
 PKP6100.0

DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; LASIK; laser in-situ keratomileusis; PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

DSAEK was the preferred transplantation technique in patients with bullous keratopathy [Table 7].
Table 7

Trauma

TypeTectonic PKPOptical PKPKLALTotal
Burn0112
Laceration222024
Total223126

PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

Mean age of patients included in this study was 52 years, due to the large number of elderly patients with ulcer and bullous keratopathy, and young patients with keratoconus. Subjects with anterior segment dysgenesis (Peter's anomaly) were the youngest and patients with BK were the oldest. In conclusion, in contrast to previous reports in Iran,[11] our study reported the novel finding that infectious corneal ulcers were the leading indication for keratoplasty followed by keratoconus and Bullous keratopathy. Similarly, there was a significant shift in corneal transplantation technique from the more invasive PKP to the less invasive DALK in patients with keratoconus.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
Table 2

Indications of corneal transplantation

FrequencyPercentage
Infectious corneal ulcers29625.8
Keratoconus24321.1
Bullous keratopathy21919.1
Failed grafts11710.2
Non-herpetic corneal scar1139.8
Corneal stromal dystrophies332.9
PMD312.7
Trauma262.3
Thin descemetocele221.9
Post-herpetic corneal scar211.8
Endothelial corneal dystrophies161.4
Anterior segment dysgenesis60.5
Post-LASIK keratectasia30.3
Corneal Fibrosis30.3
Total1149100.0

LASIK, laser in-situ keratomileusis; PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration

Table 3

Types of corneal transplantation under different indications

TypeFrequencyPercentage
PKP
 Infectious corneal ulcers29637.5
 Non-herpetic corneal scar10613.4
 Failed graft9411.9
 Keratoconus8510.8
 Bullous keratopathy779.8
 Corneal stromal dystrophies273.4
 Trauma253.2
 Thin descemetocele222.8
 PMD192.4
 Post-herpetic corneal scar172.2
 Endothelial corneal dystrophies101.3
 Anterior segment dysgenesis60.8
 Corneal Fibrosis30.4
 Post-LASIK keratectasia20.3
 Total789100.0
DALK
 Keratoconus15884.5
 PMD126.4
 Corneal stromal dystrophies63.2
 Post-herpetic corneal scar42.1
 Non-herpetic corneal scar42.1
 Failed graft21.1
 Post-LASIK keratectasia10.5
 Total187100.0
DSAEK
 Bullous keratopathy14283.0
 Failed graft2011.7
 Endothelial corneal dystrophies63.5
 Non-herpetic corneal scar31.8
 Total171100.0
KLAL
 Failed graft150.0
 Trauma150.0
 Total2100.0

DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; KLAL, keratolimbal allograft; LASIK; laser in-situ keratomileusis; PMD, pellucid marginal degeneration; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

Table 5

Types of penetrating keratoplasty

TypeFrequencyPercentage
Optical PKP59976
Tectonic PKP9211.6
Re PKP9812.4
Total789100

PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

Table 6

Endothelial corneal dystrophies

TypePKPDSAEKTotal
FED6612
CHED404
Total10616

CHED, congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy; DSAEK, Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; FED, Fuchs endothelial dystrophy; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

  15 in total

1.  A 10-year review of penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  K Inoue; S Amano; T Oshika; M Sawa; T Tsuru
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and associated procedures, 1996-2000.

Authors:  C Banu Cosar; M S Sridhar; Elisabeth J Cohen; Evan L Held; Paulo de Tarso S Alvim; Christopher J Rapuano; Irving M Raber; Peter R Laibson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the midwestern United States.

Authors:  K R Dobbins; F W Price; W E Whitson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Changing indications for corneal transplantation at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (1983-2002).

Authors:  Abdul-Elah Al-Towerki; El-Sayed Gonnah; Ali Al-Rajhi; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Three decades of corneal transplantation: indications and patient characteristics.

Authors:  A Maeno; J Naor; H M Lee; W S Hunter; D S Rootman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in East China, 1994-2003.

Authors:  Chaoran Zhang; Jianjiang Xu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Taiwan from 1987 to 1999.

Authors:  W L Chen; F R Hu; I J Wang
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Nineteen years of penetrating keratoplasty in the Hotel-Dieu Hospital in Paris.

Authors:  J M Legeais; C Parc; F d'Hermies; Y Pouliquen; G Renard
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India.

Authors:  Parul Sony; Namrata Sharma; Seema Sen; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Iran.

Authors:  Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Masoomeh Sanagoo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  2 in total

1.  Epithelium-on Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Hypotonic Riboflavin Solution in Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Kenneth A Beckman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-07

2.  Impact of COVID-19 related national lockdown on care of corneal transplantation patients at a tertiary eye care centre in India.

Authors:  Sushank Ashok Bhalerao; Sowjanya Vuyyuru; Ashik Mohamed; Pratik Y Gogri; Prashant Garg; Rajavardhan Mallipudi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.