Literature DB >> 15256997

Changing indications for corneal transplantation at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (1983-2002).

Abdul-Elah Al-Towerki1, El-Sayed Gonnah, Ali Al-Rajhi, Michael D Wagoner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify changing indications for keratoplasty over the last 20 years at a tertiary care eye hospital in a country with rapidly evolving ophthalmic care services.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the eye bank records of every patient who received a lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty at the King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January 1, 1983 and December 31, 2002. For each case, the primary surgical indication was identified.
RESULTS: A total of 8318 corneal transplants were performed during this 20-year period. In the first 5 years of the study, the leading indications for corneal transplantation were corneal scarring (52.0%), aphakic/pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (13.5%), corneal degeneration (10.0%), and keratoconus (7.6%). During the last 5 years of the study, the leading indications for corneal transplantation were keratoconus (40.2%), corneal scarring (19.8%), failed corneal transplant (11.3%), and corneal ulceration (10.2%). There was a dramatic increase in the number of transplants performed for keratoconus (441%) and failed corneal transplants (285%) as well as a dramatic decrease in the number of transplants performed for corneal degeneration (-88%) and scarring (-60%) between the first and last 5 years of the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Major changes in the indications for corneal transplantation were related to the introduction and expansion of modern ophthalmic services at a time of rapid socioeconomic development and population growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15256997     DOI: 10.1097/01.ico.0000121708.58571.5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for penetrating keratoplasty graft failure due to corneal edema.

Authors:  Anna S Kitzmann; George R Wandling; John E Sutphin; Kenneth M Goins; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Incidence and severity of keratoconus in Asir province, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  A A Assiri; B I Yousuf; A J Quantock; P J Murphy
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Method for optical coherence elastography of the cornea.

Authors:  Matthew R Ford; William J Dupps; Andrew M Rollins; Roy A Sinha; Zhilin Hu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Repeat penetrating keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome.

Authors:  H Al-Mezaine; M D Wagoner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Serial biomechanical comparison of edematous, normal, and collagen crosslinked human donor corneas using optical coherence elastography.

Authors:  Matthew R Ford; Abhijit Sinha Roy; Andrew M Rollins; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm2) corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Romeela Rana-Rahman; Yunzi Chen; Dugald Bell; Jean-Pierre Danjoux; Stephen J Morgan; Saurabh Ghosh; Oliver Baylis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual and graft survival outcomes.

Authors:  Mansour M Al-Mohaimeed
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2013-01

Review 8.  Graft failure: III. Glaucoma escalation after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Emily C Greenlee; Young H Kwon
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Genetics of the corneal endothelial dystrophies: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  A J Aldave; J Han; R F Frausto
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 10.  Pharmacologic strategies in the prevention and treatment of corneal transplant rejection.

Authors:  Khalid F Tabbara
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.