Literature DB >> 31113232

Modulating the Baseline Impedance: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate: An Adjunctive Technique for Maximizing Radiofrequency Lesion Dimensions in Deep and Intramural Ventricular Substrate.

Ayelet Shapira-Daniels1, Michael Barkagan1, Markus Rottmann1, Jakub Sroubek1, Derin Tugal1, Michael A Carlozzi1, James W McConville1, Alfred E Buxton1, Elad Anter1.   

Abstract

Background Radiofrequency ablation of intramural ventricular substrate is often limited by insufficient tissue penetration despite high energy settings. As lesion dimensions have a direct and negative relationship to impedance, reducing the baseline impedance may increase the ablation effect on deep ventricular tissue. Methods This study included 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia or frequent ventricular premature complexes refractory to ablation with irrigated catheters. After a failed response to radiofrequency ablation, impedance was modulated by adding or repositioning return patches in an attempt to decrease the circuit impedance. Ablation was repeated at a similar location and power settings, and the effect on arrhythmia suppression and adverse effects were evaluated. Results Six patients with idiopathic ventricular premature complexes originating from the left ventricular summit (n=4) or papillary muscles (n=2), 6 patients with noninfarct related ventricular tachycardia and 4 patients with infarct-related ventricular tachycardia had unsuccessful response to radiofrequency ablation at critical sites (number of applications: 10.4±3.1, power: 42.3±2.9 W, duration: 55.3±25.5 seconds, impedance reduction: 14.6±3.5 Ω, low-ionic solution was used in 81.25%). Modulating the return patches resulted in reduced baseline impedance (111.7±8.2 versus 134.7±6.6 Ω, P<0.0001), increased current output (0.6±0.02 versus 0.56±0.02 Amp; P<0.0001) and greater impedance drop (16.8±3.0 Ω, P<0.001). Repeat ablation at similar locations had a successful effect in 12 out of 16 (75.0%) patients. During a follow-up duration of 13±5 months, 10 out of 12 (83.3%) patients remained free of arrhythmia recurrence. The frequency of steam pops was similar between the higher and lower baseline impedance settings (7.1 versus 8.2%; P=0.74). Conclusions In patients with deep ventricular substrate, reducing the baseline impedance is a simple, safe, and effective technique for increasing the effect of radiofrequency ablation. However, its combination with low-ionic solutions may increase the risk for steam pops and neurological events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  impedance; radiofrequency ablation; risk; steam; tachycardia, ventricular; ventricular premature complexes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31113232      PMCID: PMC6540818          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  22 in total

1.  Circuit Impedance Could Be a Crucial Factor Influencing Radiofrequency Ablation Efficacy and Safety: A Myocardial Phantom Study of the Problem and its Correction.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhaskaran; M A Barry; Jim Pouliopoulos; Chrishan Nalliah; Pierre Qian; William Chik; Sujitha Thavapalachandran; Lloyd Davis; Alistair McEwan; Stuart Thomas; Pramesh Kovoor; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-27

2.  Outcomes of simultaneous unipolar radiofrequency catheter ablation for intramural septal ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jiandu Yang; Jackson Liang; Yasuhiro Shirai; Daniele Muser; Fermin C Garcia; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski; Pasquale Santangeli
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Effects of dispersive electrode position and surface area on electrical parameters and temperature during radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Authors:  S Nath; J P DiMarco; R G Gallop; I D McRury; D E Haines
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  An organized approach to the localization, mapping, and ablation of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  Mathew D Hutchinson; Fermin C Garcia
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-09

5.  Using endocardial unipolar mapping to identify epicardial scar: When and how to adjust the voltage amplitude slider bar?

Authors:  Victor Bazan; Pasquale Santangeli; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular summit: anatomic concepts relevant to ablation.

Authors:  Takumi Yamada; H Thomas McElderry; Harish Doppalapudi; Taro Okada; Yoshimasa Murakami; Yukihiko Yoshida; Naoki Yoshida; Yasuya Inden; Toyoaki Murohara; Vance J Plumb; G Neal Kay
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09-20

7.  ECG criteria to identify epicardial ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ermengol Vallès; Victor Bazan; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-12-11

8.  Prevalence and Electrocardiographic and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From Intramural Foci in the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract.

Authors:  Takumi Yamada; Harish Doppalapudi; William R Maddox; H Thomas McElderry; Vance J Plumb; G Neal Kay
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-09

9.  Relation of the unipolar low-voltage penumbra surrounding the endocardial low-voltage scar to ventricular tachycardia circuit sites and ablation outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Nagesh Chopra; Michifumi Tokuda; Justin Ng; Tobias Reichlin; Eyal Nof; Roy M John; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-24

10.  Bipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation: a therapeutic option for refractory intramural atrial and ventricular tachycardia circuits.

Authors:  Jacob S Koruth; Srinivas Dukkipati; Marc A Miller; Petr Neuzil; Andre d'Avila; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  6 in total

1.  Novel Irrigated Temperature-Controlled Lattice Ablation Catheter for Ventricular Ablation: A Preclinical Multimodality Biophysical Characterization.

Authors:  Ayelet Shapira-Daniels; Michael Barkagan; Hagai Yavin; Jakub Sroubek; Vivek Y Reddy; Petr Neuzil; Elad Anter
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 2.  Coronary Venous Mapping and Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Jackson J Liang; Frank Bogun
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Impact of baseline impedance of pulmonary vein antrum on success of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation guided by ablation index.

Authors:  Yuanjun Sun; Xianjie Xiao; Xiaomeng Yin; Lianjun Gao; Xiaohong Yu; Rongfeng Zhang; Zhongzhen Wang; Shiyu Dai; Yanzong Yang; Yunlong Xia
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Overcoming High Impedance in the Transitional Area of the Distal Great Cardiac Vein during Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia.

Authors:  Yan-Ru Chen; Yi-Fan Lin; Que Xu; Cheng Zheng; Rui-Lin He; Jin Li; Jia Li; Yue-Chun Li; Jia-Xuan Lin; Jia-Feng Lin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-12

5.  Novel case of linear ultra-low cryoablation catheter for treatment of ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Paula Sanchez-Somonte; Nattchayathipk Kittichamroen; Atul Verma
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-18

6.  Derivation and Verification of the Relationship between Ablation Index and Baseline Impedance.

Authors:  Zheng Cai; Sainan Li; Qi Zhang; Chenyuan Wang; Zhen Jin; Ming Fu; Shuai Zhang; Ming Liang; Zulu Wang; Yaling Han
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.866

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.