| Literature DB >> 31112545 |
Chunyu He1,2, Yanhong Zhang1, Wei Zhou3, Qingyi Guo1, Bin Bai4, Sanbao Shen5, Gaobao Huang2.
Abstract
Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is an airborne fungal disease which always destructs leaf and leads to stagnation of grain filling, decreasing of kernel weight, thin seed and yield loss. Winter wheat Huixianhong is a special germplasm with special characteristics of tolerance or resistance against stripe rust. In order to understand the effect on Huixianhong from stripe rust, we designed two kinds of treatment, inoculation of stripe rust fungi (IH) and artificial immune by bactericide (CK) to study the dynamic of disease process, the grain filling and the thousand-kernel weight (TKW). Our results showed that the incubation period of Hongxinahui was 13.5 days. The prevalence increased from 32.9% at 15 days after jointing to 80.0% at 9 days after booting, and reached to 97.0% at the heading stage. The infection type (IT) was 7 to 9 at the beginning of anthesis. The severity, leaf withered area ratio and disease index at the 15th day after anthesis were 67.17%, 98.17% and 0.6717, respectively. The IH maximum increasing rate of leaf necrosis and chlorosis area was from heading beginning stage to anthesis beginning stage, which increased from 18.66 mm2·d-1 to 21.04 mm2·d-1. The maximum rate of grain filling was 1.25 mg·d-1 at the 18th day after anthesis, which was earlier than that of CK by 3.3 days. The IH thousand-kernel weight Loss (TKWL) was more than that of CK by 6.19%, the stage of heading and amature were 3.0 days and 4.5 days earlier than CK, respectively. The stripe rust infection seriously destructed the photosynthetic function of leaf at the earlier stage of grain filling, i.e. at the beginning of anthesis, which led to the most important biomass loss and the grain filling rate decrease. As far as stripe rust is concerned, Huixianhong is a high susceptible, easily been infected, seriously showing symptoms and most quickly epidemic type but can successfully complete grain filling in high quality. It is a very useful germplasm for creating and selecting special breeding materials against stripe rust.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31112545 PMCID: PMC6528950 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The abbreviation of growth stage and organs.
| Meaning | Meaning | ||
| inoculated Huixianhong | the flag Sheath | ||
| immunized Huixianhong | the second-leaf sheath from top | ||
| seeds from single whole plant | the third-leaf sheath from top | ||
| flag leaf | the other leaves’ sheaths except the upper three | ||
| the second leaf from top | the time of planting | ||
| the third leaf from top | the stage of seedling | ||
| the other leaves except the upper three leaves | the stage of jointing | ||
| the flag stem | the stage of booting | ||
| the second-leaf stem from top | the stage of heading | ||
| the third-leaf stem from top | the stage of anthesis | ||
| the other leaves’ stems except the upper three | the stage of grain filling | ||
| the beginning of some stage | the beginning of anthesis | ||
| the 3 days after some stage | the 3 days after anthesis |
Note: The table detailed and introduced the abbreviation of different growth stages and different organs.
Fig 1Dynamic of developing and damage.
Note: 1) The letters of the dynamic line mean there were significant differences at the level of 0.05, while the same letters mean no difference. 2) GS means growth stages. As is the follows.
Fig 2Dynamic of disease index.
Note: The letters of the dynamic line means there were significant differences at the level of 0.05.
Fig 3Dynamic of disease speckles speed.
Note: Id was the first time of inoculation.
Fig 4The grain filling rate dynamics of IH and CK in different season crops (4-A, 4-B, 4-C and 4-D mean in 2011, 2012, 2013 season crops and the average rate from 2011 to 2013 season crops).
(Note: The letters of the dynamic line mean there were significant differences at the level of 0.05).
The TKW dynamic difference of IH and CK among different crop seasons unit: %.
| Days after anthesis (d) | 2011 Crop season | 2012 Crop season | 2013 Crop season | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | -74.86a | -61.73a | -51.42a | -62.67a |
| 12 | -40.83a | -1.34b | -11.16bc | -17.78b |
| 18 | -12.59b | -0.61b | -20.14b | -11.11c |
| 24 | -13.26b | -10.54b | -10.76bc | -11.52c |
| 30 | -13.04b | -17.10b | -1.12c | -10.42c |
| 36 | -4.56b | -10.87b | -3.13c | -6.18d |
| Average | -26.52A | -17.03B | -16.29B | -18.98B |
Note: Average line represents the annual average speed difference between grouting stage, and the rest of the column data on behalf of the anthesis within the year after different grain filing stage difference. The different letter means the differences at a = 0.05 level.
The tests of between-subjects effects among different treatments.
| Source | df | Mean square | Standard Erro | F Valuble | P Valuble |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tr. | 3 | 4.771 | 0.571 | 1.218 | 0.335 |
| Cr.S | 1 | 26.861 | 0.808 | 6.859 | 0.019 |
| Tr. | 3 | 5.035 | 1.143 | 1.286 | 0.313 |
| Cr.S | 3 | 51.425 | 1.120 | 0.954 | 0.460 |
Note: R2 = 0.473, Adjust R2 = 0.243; Tr. means Treatments; Cr.S means Crop season; Tr.
* Cr.S means the interaction of treatments and crop seasons.
The TKWL LSD difference results of IH and CK.
| Crop seasons I | TWL (%) | Crop seasons II | Mean Difference | Std. Erro | P | 95% Confidence Space | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Bound | Up Bound | ||||||
| 2011 | 4.56 | 2012 | 5.94 | 5.996 | 0.351 | -7.887 | 19.767 |
| 2013 | -4.14 | 5.996 | 0.509 | -17.971 | -7.887 | ||
| 2011–2013 | 0.86 | 5.996 | 0.890 | -12.971 | 14.684 | ||
| 2012 | 10.87 | 2011 | -5.94 | 5.996 | 0.351 | -19.767 | 7.887 |
| 2013 | -10.08 | 5.996 | 0.131 | -23.911 | 3.744 | ||
| 2011–2013 | -5.08 | 5.996 | 0.421 | -18.911 | 8.744 | ||
| 2013 | 3.13 | 2011 | 4.143 | 5.996 | 0.509 | -9.684 | 17.971 |
| 2012 | 10.08 | 5.996 | 0.131 | -3.744 | 23.911 | ||
| 2011–2013 | 5.00 | 5.996 | 0.429 | -8.827 | 18.827 | ||
| 2011–2013 Average | 6.19 | 2011 | -0.857 | 5.996 | 0.890 | -14.684 | 12.971 |
| 2012 | 5.08 | 5.996 | 0.421 | -8.744 | 18.911 | ||
| 2013 | -5.00 | 5.996 | 0.429 | -18.827 | 8.827 | ||
Note: The table showed the Least Significant Difference results of IH and CK about the TKWL.
The TKW equation and max values.
| Crop seasons | TrS | Equations | Vmax | Tmax | TWKm | TWKe | TKWs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | IH | W11IH = e4.188–24.507/T | 1.23 | 19 | 18.14 | 65.89 | 37.70 |
| CK | W11CK = e3.924–14.827/T | 1.33 | 14 | 17.55 | 50.60 | 39.50 | |
| 2012 | IH | W12IH = e4.361–22.875/T | 1.55 | 18 | 21.98 | 78.34 | 36.90 |
| CK | W12CK = e4.190–16.954/T | 1.61 | 15 | 21.32 | 66.02 | 41.40 | |
| 2013 | IH | W13IH = e4.113–16.035/T | 1.59 | 14 | 19.45 | 61.13 | 37.02 |
| CK | W13CK = e3.978–11.144/T | 1.63 | 12 | 21.10 | 53.41 | 37.07 | |
| 2011–2013 | IH | W11-13IH = e4.196–20.094/T | 1.48 | 16 | 18.92 | 66.42 | 37.21 |
| CK | W11-13CK = e4.028–13.949/T | 1.58 | 13 | 19.20 | 56.15 | 39.32 |
Note: TrS = Treatments. Vmaxe = the expected graining filling rate, W = TKW, T = days after Anthesis, Tmax = time at the maximum grain filling rate, TKWm = TKW at the maximum grain filling rate, TKWe = the expected maximum TKW, TKWs = the sample TKW.