| Literature DB >> 25609748 |
Marco Maccaferri1, Junli Zhang2, Peter Bulli3, Zewdie Abate2, Shiaoman Chao4, Dario Cantu5, Eligio Bossolini2, Xianming Chen6, Michael Pumphrey3, Jorge Dubcovsky7.
Abstract
New races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), the causal pathogen of wheat stripe rust, show high virulence to previously deployed resistance genes and are responsible for large yield losses worldwide. To identify new sources of resistance we performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using a worldwide collection of 1000 spring wheat accessions. Adult plants were evaluated under field conditions in six environments in the western United States, and seedlings were tested with four Pst races. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Infinium 9K-assay provided 4585 SNPs suitable for GWAS. High correlations among environments and high heritabilities were observed for stripe rust infection type and severity. Greater levels of Pst resistance were observed in a subpopulation from Southern Asia than in other groups. GWAS identified 97 loci that were significant for at least three environments, including 10 with an experiment-wise adjusted Bonferroni probability < 0.10. These 10 quantitative trait loci (QTL) explained 15% of the phenotypic variation in infection type, a percentage that increased to 45% when all QTL were considered. Three of these 10 QTL were mapped far from previously identified Pst resistance genes and QTL, and likely represent new resistance loci. The other seven QTL mapped close to known resistance genes and allelism tests will be required to test their relationships. In summary, this study provides an integrated view of stripe rust resistance resources in spring wheat and identifies new resistance loci that will be useful to diversify the current set of resistance genes deployed to control this devastating disease.Entities:
Keywords: association mapping; bread wheat; disease resistance; genetic map; yellow rust
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25609748 PMCID: PMC4349098 DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.014563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Means and ranges for response to Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici of 875 spring wheat accessions from the NSGC in six environments (three locations × two years)
| Mount Vernon (WA) | Pullman (WA) | Davis (CA) | Across Environments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT | SEV | IT | SEV | IT | SEV | IT | SEV | |
| Mean | 4.5 | 51.8 | 4.1 | 50.7 | 3.9 | 48.3 | 4.1 | 50.3 |
| Min. | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Max. | 9.0 | 100 | 9.0 | 100 | 9.0 | 100 | 9.0 | 100 |
| 0.0241**** | 0.1199**** | 0.0208**** | 0.0759**** | 0.0231**** | 0.1201**** | 0.0207**** | 0.0951**** | |
| 0.0003ns | 0.0112ns | 0.0077ns | 0.0302ns | 0.0019ns | 0.0088ns | 0.0025ns | 0.0100ns | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.0066** | 0.0295* | 0.00 | 0.0004ns | |
| 0.0091** | 0.0248**** | 0.0086**** | 0.0287**** | 0.0066** | 0.0328* | 0.0123*** | 0.0486**** | |
| 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.91 | |
Covariance estimates from the random model were calculated using the restricted maximum likelihood method on the transformed data. NSGC, National Small Grains Collection; IT, infection type; SEV, disease severity;, genotype variance estimate; , environment variance estimate; , genotype × environment variance estimate; , residual variance estimate; , broad sense heritability; ns, not significant.
P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 1Geographic distribution of seven subpopulations identified in the analysis of the population structure of 875 accessions from the National Small Grains Collection spring wheat core collection. The large pie chart indicates the relative number of accessions in the seven subpopulations. The smaller pie charts indicate their relative distribution in specific countries (the size of these pie charts is proportional to the number of accessions from that country).
Figure 2Population structure and its relationship to Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst) resistance. (A) Ward’s clustering of 875 accessions from the NSGC spring wheat core collection. Vertical lines indicate genetic similarity thresholds used to classify accessions into 4 main groups (dashed lines) and 7 subgroups (dotted lines). (B) 875 × 875 kinship matrix based on simple matching genetic similarities (IBS, identity by state). Separations among Ward’s based groups are shown as horizontal dashed lines for main groups and as dotted-dashed lines for subgroups. (C) Matrices of membership coefficients of accessions corresponding to 4−7 hypothetical subpopulations derived from the STRUCTURE analysis (D) Response of accessions to Pst (IT, infection types, SEV, disease severity). Blue lines indicate Pst resistance and red lines Pst susceptibility (based on the best linear unbiased estimates over six environments). (E) Percentage memberships of accessions from the seven subpopulations to the four main continents.
Figure 3Distributions of infection type (IT) and disease severity (SEV). Distributions of best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs) across all six environments for IT (A–B) and SEV (D–E). “W” indicates the correlation between observed values and normal scores for the original (A and D) and transformed (B and E) values. (C and F) Boxplot showing differences among subpopulations for IT (C) and SEV (F).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients for IT and SEV response to Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici of 875 NSGC spring wheat accessions in six environments
| MTV-12 | MTV-13 | PLM-11 | PLM-12 | DVS-11 | DVS-12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT | ||||||
| MTV-12 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.67 | ||
| MTV-13 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.62 | ||
| PLM-11 | 0.59 | 0.65 | ||||
| PLM-12 | 0.63 | 0.70 | ||||
| DVS-11 | ||||||
| DVS-12 | ||||||
| SEV | MTV-12 | MTV-13 | PLM-11 | PLM-12 | DVS-11 | DVS-12 |
| MTV-12 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.72 | ||
| MTV-13 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.67 | ||
| PLM-11 | 0.55 | 0.65 | ||||
| PLM-12 | 0.58 | 0.68 | ||||
| DVS-11 | ||||||
| DVS-12 | ||||||
| IT | MTV-12 | MTV-13 | PLM-11 | PLM-12 | DVS-11 | DVS-12 |
| MTV-12 | 0.86 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.71 | |
| MTV-13 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.64 | |
| PLM-11 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.62 | |
| PLM-12 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.56 | 0.69 | |
| DVS-11 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.85 | |
| DVS-12 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.87 |
Gray highlight indicates comparisons between the same location and year. Bold letters indicate comparisons between different years in the same location. All correlation coefficients are highly significant (P < 0.0001). IT, infection type; SEV, disease severity.
Locations: MTV, Mount Vernon, WA; PLM, Pullman, WA; DVS, Davis, CA. Followed by year.
Loci significantly associated with IT or SEV in at least three environments (one at P < 0.01) and with experiment-wise Bonferroni P < 0.10
| Marker IWA | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTL name | ||||||||||
| Chromosome | 1B | 1D | 2A | 2A | 3B | 4A | 4D | 5A | 6B | 6D |
| Position | 123.4 | 49.3 | 9.9 | 78.3 | 3.9 | 181.7 | 26.9 | 189.2 | 112.3 | 73.2 |
| Alleles (R underscored) | T/ | T/ | A/ | |||||||
| GWAS for IT | ||||||||||
| MTV_2012 | **** | ns | *** | ns | ** | * | **** | * | ** | **** |
| MTV_2013 | * | ** | * | * | ns | ** | * | ns | * | *** |
| PLM_2011 | * | * | **** | ns | *** | **** | ** | **** | **** | *** |
| PLM_2012 | ns | *** | *** | ns | **** | * | ns | ns | **** | ** |
| DVS_2011 | ** | * | ns | ns | * | ** | ** | **** | * | **** |
| DVS_2012 | * | ns | ** | * | ns | * | ** | ** | *** | **** |
| BLUE_MTV | * | *** | ** | * | * | **** | *** | ns | ** | **** |
| BLUE_PLM | ** | ns | **** | ns | **** | ** | ** | ** | **** | *** |
| BLUE_DVS | **** | ** | * | ns | ns | ** | *** | *** | *** | **** |
| BLUE_ALL | *** | * | *** | * | *** | **** | *** | *** | **** | **** |
| GWAS for SEV | ||||||||||
| MTV_2012 | *** | ns | *** | * | ns | * | *** | ns | * | *** |
| MTV_2013 | ** | * | ** | * | ns | * | *** | ns | * | *** |
| PLM_2011 | *** | ns | ** | *** | *** | ** | * | ns | ** | * |
| PLM_2012 | *** | **** | **** | *** | * | ns | **** | ** | ** | ** |
| DVS_2011 | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | *** | *** | * | **** |
| DVS_2012 | * | * | ** | ns | ns | * | ** | ** | **** | **** |
| BLUE_MTV | *** | * | ** | * | ns | * | *** | ns | * | *** |
| BLUE_PLM | ** | * | *** | **** | ** | * | ** | * | ** | * |
| BLUE_DVS | **** | ** | * | * | ns | * | *** | *** | *** | **** |
| BLUE_ALL | **** | * | *** | ** | ns | ** | *** | ** | *** | **** |
| GWAS seedling | ||||||||||
| Significant races | PSTv40 | None | Pstv14 | Pstv14 and 40 | None | None | Pstv4 | Pstv14 | None | None |
| Frequency R allele | ||||||||||
| Overall | 0.70 | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.70 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.10 |
| Subpop. 1A | 0.77 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.08 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.61 | 0.36 |
| Subpop. 1B | 0.87 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.83 | 0.52 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.32 | 0.10 | |
| Subpop. 2 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.19 | 0.80 | 0.47 | 0.12 | 0.51 | |||
| Subpop.3 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.25 | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.11 | ||
| Subpop. 4A | 0.53 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.26 | 0.39 | 0.10 | 0.38 | |||
| Subpop. 4B | 0.77 | 0.43 | 0.77 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.23 | ||||
| Subpop. 4C | 0.70 | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.88 | 0.88 | ||||
| % explained variation | ||||||||||
| 0.7% | 1.2% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 2.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 0.7% | |
| 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.3% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.7% |
IT, infection type; SEV, disease severity.
SNP indexes from the Illumina iSelect 9K wheat assay (Cavanagh ). Bold IWA names were identified in the GWAS including only the 593 accession with IT scores ≥ 3, and were significant in both analyses. SNP loci in LD and significantly associated to the Pst response (IWA): 3892/846, 980/642, 422/423/3468/3469, 424/none, 5202/4796, 1034/none, 5375/5766, 6988/none, 7257/none, 167/none.
IWA424 was borderline significant in the Bonferroni test only for SEV and only in one location. Therefore, it should be considered with caution.
IWA1034 is in the region of 4AL translocated from 7BS (homology 7AS/4AL/7DS) (Devos ).
IWA6988 is in the region of 5AL translocated from 4AL (homology 5AL/4BL/4DL) (Devos ).
Scaled position from hexaploid wheat consensus map (Cavanagh ).
Significance. Marker-wise: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Experiment-wise: ****Bonferroni P < 0.10.
Figure 4Genome-wide average linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay over genetic distances. (A) Plot of pair-wise single-nucleotide polymorphism LD r2 values as a function of intermarker map distance (cM) based on a reference consensus map (Cavanagh ). The red curve represents the model fit to LD decay. The light-blue dashed line represents the ±1.6 cM confidence interval for the quantitative trait loci regions in which LD r2 = 0.3. (B) Boxplot showing LD r2 values for incremental classes of single-nucleotide polymorphism pairwise map distances.
Figure 5 P value association plots and corresponding linkage disequilibrium (LD) r2 patterns for two significant Pst resistance quantitative trait loci (QTL). The upper part of the graph shows P value plots of marker-trait associations for best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs) of infection types (IT) and disease severity (SEV) over six environments and for the three specific locations (MTV, Mount Vernon; PLM, Pullman; DVS, Davis). Map distances (X-axis) are from the 9K SNP consensus map (Cavanagh ). –Log (P) significance thresholds are reported using dashed lines. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) codes and corresponding local LD r2 value patterns are in the lower part of the graph. Numbers within the diamonds of the triangular LD matrix are the r values multiplied by 100.
Figure 6Chromosome positions of Pst-associated quantitative trait loci (QTL) identified in this study (experiment-wise Bonferroni P < 0.1) relative to previously mapped Pst resistance genes and QTL. Chromosome lengths were all standardized to the same relative length. QTL-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms identified in this genome-wide association (GWAS) are on the left side of the chromosomes. Those with a red line were significant only in the overall GWAS, those with a blue line only in the GWAS for partial resistance, and those with a purple line were significant in both (Table 3). Previously mapped Pst resistance genes (green) and QTL (blue) are on the right side of the chromosomes. The ID numbers on top of the QTL indicate references and confidence intervals provided in File S5.