Literature DB >> 29084880

Estimating the Cost of Preeclampsia in the Healthcare System: Cross-Sectional Study Using Data From SCOPE Study (Screening for Pregnancy End Points).

Aimée Fox1, Sheena McHugh2, John Browne2, Louise C Kenny2, Anthony Fitzgerald2, Ali S Khashan2, Eugene Dempsey2, Ciara Fahy2, Ciaran O'Neill2, Patricia M Kearney2.   

Abstract

To estimate the cost of preeclampsia from the national health payer's perspective using secondary data from the SCOPE study (Screening for Pregnancy End Points). SCOPE is an international observational prospective study of healthy nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies. Using data from the Irish cohort recruited between November 2008 and February 2011, all women with preeclampsia and a 10% random sample of women without preeclampsia were selected. Additional health service use data were extracted from the consenting participants' medical records for maternity services which were not included in SCOPE. Unit costs were based on estimates from 3 existing Irish studies. Costs were extrapolated to a national level using a prevalence rate of 5% to 7% among nulliparous pregnancies. Within the cohort of 1774 women, 68 developed preeclampsia (3.8%) and 171 women were randomly selected as controls. Women with preeclampsia used higher levels of maternity services. The average cost of a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia was €5243 per case compared with €2452 per case for an uncomplicated pregnancy. The national cost of preeclampsia is between €6.5 and €9.1 million per annum based on the 5% to 7% prevalence rate. Postpartum care was the largest contributor to these costs (€4.9-€6.9 million), followed by antepartum care (€0.9-€1.3 million) and peripartum care (€0.6-€0.7 million). Women with preeclampsia generate significantly higher maternity costs than women without preeclampsia. These cost estimates will allow policy-makers to efficiently allocate resources for this pregnancy-specific condition. Moreover, these estimates are useful for future research assessing the cost-effectiveness of preeclampsia screening and treatment.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypertension; medical records; pregnancy; prevalence; research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29084880     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  11 in total

1.  The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention.

Authors:  Liona C Poon; Andrew Shennan; Jonathan A Hyett; Anil Kapur; Eran Hadar; Hema Divakar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Peter von Dadelszen; Harold David McIntyre; Anne B Kihara; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Roberto Romero; Mary D'Alton; Vincenzo Berghella; Kypros H Nicolaides; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Isthmin 2 is decreased in preeclampsia and highly expressed in choriocarcinoma.

Authors:  Cynthia Martinez; Javier González-Ramírez; María E Marín; Gustavo Martínez-Coronilla; Vanessa I Meza-Reyna; Rafael Mora; Raul Díaz-Molina
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-10-13

3.  The invisible costs of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Systematic review and cost-of-illness analysis.

Authors:  Ludovica Borsoi; Patrizio Armeni; Gleb Donin; Francesco Costa; Luigi Ferini-Strambi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Placental growth factor testing to assess women with suspected pre-eclampsia: a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kate E Duhig; Jenny Myers; Paul T Seed; Jenie Sparkes; Jessica Lowe; Rachael M Hunter; Andrew H Shennan; Lucy C Chappell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Cardiovascular System in Preeclampsia and Beyond.

Authors:  Basky Thilaganathan; Erkan Kalafat
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Cost Effectiveness of Antenatal Lifestyle Interventions for Preventing Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disease in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Cate Bailey; Helen Skouteris; Cheryce L Harrison; Jacqueline Boyle; Rebeccah Bartlett; Briony Hill; Shakila Thangaratinam; Helena Teede; Zanfina Ademi
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2020-09

7.  Aspirin non-adherence in pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia (ANA): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Raya Vinogradov; Vikki Joanne Smith; Stephen Courtenay Robson; Vera Araujo-Soares
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-08-06

8.  Early cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for preeclampsia in nulliparous women: A modelling approach in European high-income settings.

Authors:  Neily Zakiyah; Robin Tuytten; Philip N Baker; Louise C Kenny; Maarten J Postma; Antoinette D I van Asselt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Maternal health and non-communicable disease prevention: An investment case for the post COVID-19 world and need for better health economic data.

Authors:  Anil Kapur; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.447

10.  Economic burden of maternal morbidity - A systematic review of cost-of-illness studies.

Authors:  Patrick S Moran; Francesca Wuytack; Michael Turner; Charles Normand; Stephanie Brown; Cecily Begley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.