Literature DB >> 31110589

Analysis of Nitrosamines in Processed Meat Products in Medan City by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.

Henni Cintya1, Jansen Silalahi1, Effendy De Lux Putra1, Rikson Siburian2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nitrosamine is a carcinogen and the maximum level in processed meat products set by WHO. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine nitrosamine levels in meat products in Medan City and compared nitrosamine levels with standards set by WHO.
METHODS: The samples analysed were obtained from Berastagi Supermarket, sausages, burgers, corned beef and smoked beef. Nitrosamine levels were determined by reverse phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: The results showed that only 5 out of 20 samples of N-nitroso-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (NTCA) nitrosamine ranged from 501.290 to 4227.492 µg/kg. The highest level of NTCA was found in smoked beef (Chiefs), which is 4227.492 µg/kg. N-nitroso-2-methyl-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (NMTCA) was contained in all the samples analysed which ranged from 20.50 to 989.175 µg/kg. The highest NMTCA nitrosamine content was found in smoked beef (Chiefs), which is 989.175 µg/kg.
CONCLUSION: From this study reveal that nitrosamines in meat products exceed the maximum standards set by WHO (10 µg/kg).

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC-MS/MS; Meat products; Nitrosamines

Year:  2019        PMID: 31110589      PMCID: PMC6514351          DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci        ISSN: 1857-9655


Introduction

Nitrite and nitrate are generally found widely in soil, water, and food (especially in vegetables) [1]. Also, nitrite and nitrate are also intentionally added to some foods such as processed meats as preservatives and colouring agents [2]. The use of nitrite in processed meat products may react with alkyl amines to form carcinogen nitrosamines. The maximum level in processed meat set by WHO WHO is 10 µg/kg [3], [4], [5], [6]. There are several factors affecting the formation of nitrosamines, namely the concentration of nitrite, acidity, temperature, storage condition, the alkalinity of amines, and the presence of catalysts or inhibitors. So it is very necessary to analyse the content of nitrosamines in food, especially in meat products [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Nitrosamine analysis in food can be done by high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography with a detector system. The method of high-performance liquid chromatography using mass spectroscopy is very selective and sensitive and can be used as an alternative method compared to other chromatographic methods [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The purpose of this study was to determine nitrosamine levels in meat products in Medan City and compared nitrosamine levels in meat products with standards set by WHO.

Material and Method

Materials

The materials used in this study were acetonitrile, formic acid (98%), methanol. Nitrosamines standard are N-Nitrosodietylamine (NDEA), N-nitroso-2-methyl-thiazolidine 4-carboxylic acid (NMTCA) and N-nitroso-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (NTCA).

Samples Preparation

The samples used in this study were meat products (sausages, corned beef, burgers, and smoked beef) were obtained from Berastagi Supermarket in Medan city. Samples that have been taken and then placed in a cooling bag containing ice, then stored in the Laboratory in the freezer (temperature -20°C) before testing.

Format Acid Solution 0.1% in Purified Double Distillation Water

Transferred 0.5 mL formic acid (E.Merck) in a 1000 mL beaker glass, then added distilled water up to 500 mL. The mixture was stirred and filtered with 0.2 μm of cellulose nitrate filter membrane. The results obtained was 0.1% formic acid solution in distilled water.

Format Acid Solution 0.1% in Acetonitrile

Transferred 0.5 ml of formic acid (E. Merck) in a 1000 ml beaker glass, then added acetonitrile to 500 ml. The mixture was stirred and filtered with a 0.5 μm polymeretraflouroethylene (PTFE) filter membrane. The results obtained was 0.1% formic acid solution in acetonitrile.

Preparation of NDEA Standard Solution

Weighed 100 mg NDEA standard, transferred into a 10 ml volumetric flask, dissolved with acetonitrile to the marked line and shaken. Then, it was stirred for 5 minutes until it dissolved to obtain NDEA 10000 μg/ml solutions.

Preparation NMTCA Standard Solution

Weighed 10 mg of NMTCA standard, transferred into a 10 ml volumetric flask, dissolved with acetonitrile to the mark and shaken. Then, it was stirred for 5 minutes until it dissolved to obtain NMTCA 1000 μg/ml solutions.

Preparation of NTCA Standard Solution

Weighed 10 mg of NTCA standard, transferred into a 10 ml volumetric flask, dissolved with acetonitrile to the mark and shaken. Then, it was stirred for 5 minutes until it dissolved to obtain NDEA 1000 μg/ml solutions.

Chromatographic Condition

The nitrogen generator was turned on until it is ready to produce nitrogen gas used for mass spectrometry detectors. Then high performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1290 HPLC) mass spectrometry (ABSciex API 4000 Q TRAP type) was turned on, by: turning on the mass spectrometry detector, setting positive detection, leaving it for a while until the mass spectrometry conditions become vacuum, run the pump on the type mixture of mobile phase, comparison of ratio mobile phase and predetermined mobile phase flow rate, as well as column oven temperature set at predetermined conditions, then the mobile phase was flowed until a stable pressure was obtained, which indicates that the high-performance liquid chromatography system of mass spectrometry has been stable and ready used for analysis [14].

Mobile Phase

The mobile phase used was a mixture of 0.1% formic acid solution in water and 0.1% formic acid solution in acetonitrile. The ratio of the mobile phase in the mixture were 10:90, 30:70, 50:50, 70:30 and 90: 10. Each of this mobile phase was used to separate the standard solution to determine optimum mobile phase composition [3], [12].

Nitrosamine Extraction

Five (5) g of mashed meat samples were weighed and transferred into 25 ml volumetric flask. Acetonitrile was added until 25 ml and then homogenised. Then, it was transferred into a tube and then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 8000 rpm. Five (5) ml of supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 µm filter membrane; then the solution was transferred into a vial. Ten (10) μL of solution was injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography system through an automatic injector [3], [12].

Calibration Curves

From the standard solution (NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA) with a concentration of 1.25 mg/ml, pipetted 0.4 ml; 1 ml; 2 ml; 4 ml, and 10 ml, respectively. Each solution was transferred into volumetric flask 25 ml, then added acetonitrile to the marked line. The concentration of nitrosamine solutions (NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA) is 20; 50; 100; 200; and 500 ng/ml). Each solution was filtered through a membrane filter politetraflouroetilen (PTFE) of 0.2 µm. Then, the filtered solutions were transferred into a vial. Ten (10) μL of solution was injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography system through an automatic injector. The peak area of chromatogram was obtained. Then a calibration curve is made by plotting peak area versus concentration. Then, the regression line equation (Y = aX + b) determined.

Analysis of Nitrosamines in Processed Meat Products

Five (5) g of mashed meat samples were weighed and transferred into 25 ml volumetric flask. Acetonitrile was added until 25 ml and then homogenised. Then, it was transferred into a tube and then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 8000 rpm. Five (5) ml of supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 µm filter membrane; then the solution was transferred into a vial. Ten (10) μL of solution was injected into a high-performance liquid chromatography system through an automatic injector. MS/MS detection was done by Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM). The mass spectrometer is operationalised using electrospray ionisation (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI) technique. The ion monitored in mass spectrometry is a positive ion that has a mass of 103 for NDEA, and negative ions that have a mass of 175 for NMTCA, and 161 for NTCA. Chromatogram and peak area were obtained, and then the concentration was calculated by substituting the peak area into the regression equation (y = ax + b) obtained from the calibration curve on linearity testing [3], [12]. Nitrosamine levels in solution can be calculated by the regression equation Y = a X + b. Nitrosamine concentration was calculated using this equation: C = Nitrosamine concentration in the sample (µg/kg); X = Nitrosamine levels in sample solution (ng/ml); V = Volume of sample solution before dilution (25 ml); Fp = Dilution Factors (1).

Results

Determination of Mobile Phase Composition

Determination of the mobile phase composition was done to get the best separation method. NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA standard solutions in water and acetonitrile (ratio 10:90, 30:70, 50:50, 70:30) were injected into LCMS- MS/MS system through an automatic injector. The ideal chromatogram peak was shown by a Gaussian form with asymmetric value (tailing factor) which of 1. Tailing factor data with a different ratio of mobile phase for the analysis of NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1

Tailing Factor with different ratio of mobile phase for analysis of NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA

Motion PhaseTailing Factor

NDEANMTCANTCA
0.1% Formic acid in water: 0.1% Formic acid acetonitrile (10:90)NANA1,2
0.1% Formic acid in water: 0.1% Formic acid acetonitrile (30:70)0.95NA0.93
0.1% Formic acid in water: 0.1% Formic acid acetonitrile (50:50)NANA1.5
0.1% Formic acid in water: 0.1% Formic acid acetonitrile (70:30)1.0811
Water: Acetonitrile (Format acid 0.1%) 0.1% format) 90:10NANA1.07

(Description: NA = Not applied)

Tailing Factor with different ratio of mobile phase for analysis of NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA (Description: NA = Not applied) In Table 1 it is shown that the best chromatogram mobile phase ratio is 70:30 (water: acetonitrile) because a symmetrical and sharp peak was produced and meets the requirements for tailing factor of 1.08 for the NDEA, 1 for NMTCA and NTCA. The best mobile phase with a ratio of 70:30 was then used for analysis of mixed solutions of NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA. Chromatogram of NTCA, NMTCA, and NDEA using optimum mobile phase detected by Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) Mass Spectrometry can be seen in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Chromatogram of NTCA, NMTCA, and NDEA using optimum mobile phase detected by Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) Mass Spectrometry (A); N-nitroso-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (NTCA) and N-nitroso-2-methyl-thiazolidine 4-carboxylic acid (NMTCA) detected with ESI ionisation and (B); N-Nitrosodietylamine (NDEA) with APCI ionisation

Chromatogram of NTCA, NMTCA, and NDEA using optimum mobile phase detected by Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) Mass Spectrometry (A); N-nitroso-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (NTCA) and N-nitroso-2-methyl-thiazolidine 4-carboxylic acid (NMTCA) detected with ESI ionisation and (B); N-Nitrosodietylamine (NDEA) with APCI ionisation As seen Figure 1, it is shown that the optimum mobile phase for the analysis of both volatile and non-volatile nitrosamines is 0.1 % formic acid in water: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (70:30) with flow rate 1 ml/minute. The standard mixture of NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA eluted the optimum mobile phase shows a symmetrical and sharp peak. NDEA is analysed better using APCI compared to ESI. This is indicated by the high signal response obtained when NDEA standard solutions were analysed using APCI compared to ESI. APCI is usually used for the analysis of volatile nitrosamine compounds. On the other hand, NMTCA and NTCA are analysed better using ESI because higher signal responses were obtained [3], [12].

Calibration Curve

The concentration used for calibration curve preparation are: 20 ng/ml; 50 ng/ml; 100 ng/ml; 200 ng/ml; and 500 ng/ml for NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA. Calibration curve of NDEA can be seen in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Calibration Curve of NDEA

Calibration Curve of NDEA In Figure 2 it can be seen that the calibration curve obtained has a linear relationship between peak area and concentration. The regression line equation obtained is y = 5.683 x + 10.93 with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9997. This shows a linear correlation between the area of the chromatogram and the concentration of NDEA [5], [6]. The calibration curve of NMTCA can be seen in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Calibration Curve of NMTCA

Calibration Curve of NMTCA In Figure 3 it can be seen that the calibration curve obtained has a linear relationship between peak area and concentration. The regression line equation obtained is y = 433.8 x - 1797 with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9994. This shows a linear correlation between the area of the chromatogram and the concentration of N MTCA [5], [6]. The calibration curve of NTCA can be seen in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Calibration Curve of NTCA

Calibration Curve of NTCA In Figure 4 it can be seen that the calibration curve obtained has a linear relationship between peak and concentration. The regression line equation obtained is y = 258 x + 85.82 with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9995. This shows a linear correlation between the area of the chromatogram and the concentration of NTCA [5], [6].

Nitrosamine Levels in Various Types of Processed Meat Products

Determination of nitrosamines levels was carried out using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method which is then characterised by a mass spectrometer. Nitrosamine levels in various types of processed meat products can be seen in Table 2.
Table 2

Nitrosamine Levels (NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA) in Various Types of Processed Meat Products

A. SAUSAGE

 No.Nitrosamine   BrandNitrosamine ± SD (µg/kg)
  1NDEAFiesta-
Delicious-
Kenfood-
Kimbo-
So good-
  2NMTCAFiesta36.91 ± 6.2210
Delicious39.41 ± 3.0015
Kenfood35.64 ± 6.3940
Kimbo41.99 ± 6.6020
So good108.14 ± 6.5348
  3NTCAFiesta585.45 ± 23.8477
Delicious-
Kenfood-
Kimbo-
So good2565.44 ± 60.8385

B. CORNED

 No.Nitrosamine   BrandNitrosamine ± SD (µg/kg)

  1NDEAKornetku-
Pronas-
Milli-
Libbys-
Bernardi-
  2NMTCAKornetku20.54 ± 0.2951
Pronas20.50 ± 0.2604
Milli48.05 ± 2.8778
Libbys46.84 ± 37.3362
Bernardi90.52 ± 84.3906
  3NTCAKornetku-
Pronas-
Milli-
Libbys-
Bernardi1508 ± 2975.7

C. BURGER

 No.Nitrosamine   BrandNitrosamine ± SD (µg/kg)

  1NDEAKimbo-
Bernardi-
Vitalia-
Hemato-
Abbys-
  2NMTCAKimbo20.705 ± 0.0077
Bernardi20.703 ± 0.0043
Vitalia35.79 ± 2.7469
Hemato20.705 ± 0.0062
Abbys20.700 ± 0.0118
  3NTCAKimbo-
Bernardi-
Vitalia-
Hemato-
Abbys-

D. SMOKED BEEF

 No.Nitrosamine   BrandNitrosamine ± SD (µg/kg)

  1NDEAFiesta-
Yona-
Chiefs-
Bernardi-
Farmhouse-
  2NMTCAFiesta20.703 ± 0.0113
Yona20.702 ± 0.0107
Chiefs989.175 ± 116,403
Bernardi20.708 ± 0.0078
Farmhouse20.697 ± 0.0224
  3NTCAFiesta-
Yona-
Chiefs4227.492 ± 605.5445
Bernardi501.290 ± 108.1681
Farmhouse-

Note: ((-): Not Detected, the data is an average of three Repeat times)

Nitrosamine Levels (NDEA, NMTCA, and NTCA) in Various Types of Processed Meat Products Note: ((-): Not Detected, the data is an average of three Repeat times)

Discussion

Based on Table 3, it can be seen that there are differences in nitrosamine levels (NDEA, NMTCA, NTCA) in various types of processed meat products. There are 20 samples consisting of 5 types of sausage brands, 5 types of corned beef brands, 5 types of burger brands, and 5 types of smoked beef brands. Of all samples analysed, NDEA (a volatile nitrosamine) was not detected. There are 2 possibilities, either NDEA is not present in the samples, or it is present in the sample, but below the limit of detection. On the other hand, non-volatile nitrosamine compounds such as NMTCA and NTCA are found in the samples and vary greatly. There are also some samples where these compounds are not detected. The highest nitrosamine level is NTCA (4227.492 µg/kg) which is found in smoked beef (Chiefs). The level of NMTCA in all samples analysed varies greatly, ranging from 20.50 to 989.175 µg/kg. Whereas NTCA was only found in 5 of the 20 samples tested, ranging from 501.290-4227.492 µg/kg. In this study, it is found that the levels of NMTCA in all samples exceed the limit set by the WHO, which is 10 µg/kg body weight. In sausage samples, NMTCA levels detected are 36.91 µg/kg (Fiesta), 39.41 µg/kg (Delicious), 35.64 µg/kg (Kenfood), 41.99 µg/kg (Kimbo) and 108.31 µg/kg (So Good). In corned beef samples, NMTCA levels detected are 20.54 µg/kg (Korenetku), 20.50 µg/kg (Pronas), 48.05 µg/kg (Mili), 46.84 µg/kg (libbys), and 90.52 µg/kg (Bernardi). In the burger samples, NMTCA levels detected are 20.705 µg/kg (Kimbo), 20.703 µg/kg (Bernanrdi), 35.79 µg/kg (Vitalia), 20.705 (Hemato), and 20.70 µg/kg (Abbys). In smoked beef samples, NMTCA levels detected are 20.703 µg/kg (Fiesta), 20.702 µg/kg (Yona), 989.175 µg/kg (Chiefs), 20.708 µg/kg (Bernardi), and 20.697 µg/kg (Farmhouse). Besides that, it is also found that NTCA in some samples exceeds the limit allowed by the WHO. Those samples are Fiesta sausage (585.45 µg/kg) and So Good (2565.44 µg/kg), corned beef Bernardi (1508.00 µg/kg), smoked beef Chiefs (4229.492 µg/kg) and smoked beef Bernardi (501.29 µg/kg). Based on previous research conducted by Herrmann (2014), nitrosamines levels obtained were also varied. The highest nitrosamine content found is NTCA which is 4030 µg/kg. The results of this study are the same as previous studies, where NDEA levels are not detected in all analysed samples. But in this study nitrosamine levels are higher than previous studies. The highest nitrosamine level is NTCA which is 4227.492 µg/kg (smoked beef Chiefs). The highest NMTCA and NTCA levels are found in smoked beef products. This is also corresponding to the previous study conducted by Herrmann (2014) where the levels of nitrosamines reach the maximum level of 2034-4030 µg/kg. The formation of these two nitrosamines is high in smoked beef samples because the high temperature applied during the smoking process triggers NMTCA and NTCA formation. It is also likely to occur due to several factors such as the concentration of nitrite, temperature, storage condition, the presence of catalysts or inhibitors. The higher the concentration of nitrite and amine compounds, the easier the formation of nitrosamines will be. However, the toxicological properties of both NMTCA and NTCA (nonvolatile nitrosamine) compounds have not been detected. Nonvolatile nitrosamines are weak carcinogens, but not enough data to determine the toxicological properties of these two compounds. However, NMTCA and NTCA nitrosamine levels in processed meat products need to be considered to prevent cancer prevalence [3], [9], [11], [12], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].
  2 in total

1.  Analysis and health risk assessment of nitrosamines in meat products collected from markets, Iran: with the approach of chemometric.

Authors:  Samin Moradi; Nabi Shariatifar; Behrouz Akbari-Adergani; Ebrahim Molaee Aghaee; Majid Arbameri
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-06-21

2.  The effect of ascorbic acid, storage period and packaging material on the formation of volatile N-nitrosamine in sausages.

Authors:  Sena Özbay; U Tansel Şireli
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.117

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.