Hualin Ma1, Ying Xu2, Rongrong Zhang1, Baochun Guo1, Shuyan Zhang1, Xinzhou Zhang1. 1. Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou city, Guangdong province, China. 2. Department of Hematology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to further explore the pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), gene-sequencing was used to analyze the differentially expressed circRNAs in exosomes of patients with IMN, which may lay the foundation for the research of circRNAs as a new class of exosome-based IMN diagnosis biomarkers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with IMN and ten normal controls were recruited as experimental subjects in our study. The exosomes were extracted from the collected serum and urine. Then, pure circRNAs were extracted from the exosomes with a series of enzymatic reactions. Afterwards, the significantly differentially expressed circRNAs were chosen by the method of gene-sequencing. RESULTS: Compared with normal controls, the circRNAs were reduced in the exosomes from serum of patients with IMN, which mostly originated from intron gene regions. Meanwhile, a total of 89 circRNAs were significantly differentially expressed, which were also mostly derived from intron gene regions, including 49 up-regulated and 40 down-regulated genes. However, the species were increased in the exosomes from the urine of patients with IMN compared to normal controls, and they mainly originated from exon gene regions. Simultaneously, 60 circRNAs were significantly differentially expressed, which primarily belonged to intron gene regions, including 54 up-regulated and 6 down-regulated regions. CONCLUSIONS: The significant differential and specific expression of circRNAs in the exosomes from patients with IMN were observed. For example, MUC3A, which originated from chr7:100550808|100551062, could be considered a potential diagnostic biomarker of IMN. Furthermore, these figures may be used as a reference or supplement in the research of the pathogenesis of IMN.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to further explore the pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), gene-sequencing was used to analyze the differentially expressed circRNAs in exosomes of patients with IMN, which may lay the foundation for the research of circRNAs as a new class of exosome-based IMN diagnosis biomarkers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients with IMN and ten normal controls were recruited as experimental subjects in our study. The exosomes were extracted from the collected serum and urine. Then, pure circRNAs were extracted from the exosomes with a series of enzymatic reactions. Afterwards, the significantly differentially expressed circRNAs were chosen by the method of gene-sequencing. RESULTS: Compared with normal controls, the circRNAs were reduced in the exosomes from serum of patients with IMN, which mostly originated from intron gene regions. Meanwhile, a total of 89 circRNAs were significantly differentially expressed, which were also mostly derived from intron gene regions, including 49 up-regulated and 40 down-regulated genes. However, the species were increased in the exosomes from the urine of patients with IMN compared to normal controls, and they mainly originated from exon gene regions. Simultaneously, 60 circRNAs were significantly differentially expressed, which primarily belonged to intron gene regions, including 54 up-regulated and 6 down-regulated regions. CONCLUSIONS: The significant differential and specific expression of circRNAs in the exosomes from patients with IMN were observed. For example, MUC3A, which originated from chr7:100550808|100551062, could be considered a potential diagnostic biomarker of IMN. Furthermore, these figures may be used as a reference or supplement in the research of the pathogenesis of IMN.
Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common cause of adult nephrotic syndrome. Approximately 25% to 40% of adult primary nephrotic syndrome cases have IMN. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy is also the most common pathologic type of glomerular disease, and IMN has a longer disease course. The prognosis of IMN varies [1]. The pathologic features of IMN are a high number of immune complexes deposited in the glomerular basement membrane on the epithelium side.The exosome has a double layer plasma membrane structure. Its diameter is approximately 30–100 nm, and it carries a rich protein, mRNA and microRNA. Exosomes are released to the extracellular microenvironment by the cells [2, 3]. They can be released from fibroblasts, dendritic cells, tumor cells and other cells; they are widespread in the urine [4], peripheral blood, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, amniotic fluid, ascites and other body fluids [3, 5]. Therefore, we can detect exosomes and their contents from tissue, cells and body fluids to diagnose and clinically treat the disease, especially kidney disease. Miranda et al. [6] observed exosomes of renal tubular epithelial cells, podocytes, collecting duct cells and leap cells by transmission electron microscopy, which showed that almost all kidney inherent cells could secrete exosomes. In addition, the authors found that the components of exosomes were different in normal physiological conditions and disease conditions even for the same tissue or body fluid [7]. Previous studies have shown that the contents of exosomes have a characteristic change in acute kidney injury [8], IgA nephropathy [9], diabetic nephropathy [10], renal tubular acidosis [6], polycystic kidney [11] and other kidney diseases. The findings suggested that exosomes can be used as specific markers for early disease diagnosis.Recent studies have shown that circRNAs can be used as biomarkers for the diagnosis and efficacy of a variety of clinical diseases, such as atherosclerosis [12], neurological diseases [13-15], diabetes [16], tumors [17-19] and more. In addition, because of the high stability of the circRNAs and the difficulty of degrading them by exonuclease, we can easily obtain circRNA from body fluid [12]. Based on the above characteristics, circRNAs show great potential to regulate human disease genes [20], making them a current research focus. In 2005, Huang found many exosomes in human serum and discovered that there is a difference in the exo-circRNA between colorectal cancer and normal human serum [21]. The authors speculated that circRNAs could be used as a new biomarker for cancer diagnosis. This discovery renewed people’s awareness of circRNAs and exosomes because the authors had linked two emerging areas and further demonstrated the importance of circRNA and exosomes in organisms [21].In this study, we evaluated circRNAs of exosomes. We compared the expression of circRNAs in the exosomes of serum and urine in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and normal healthy controls by gene sequencing. Then, we screened out the differential expression of circRNAs and performed further analysis. The rich data from the analysis provide insight into the pathogenesis of IMN and a solution for future diagnosis and treatment.
Material and methods
Patient assessments and classifications
The study protocols and consent forms were approved by the Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People’s Hospital) of Jinan University and adhere to the Helsinki Declaration guidelines on ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ten IMN patients who had never been treated with glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressive drugs were recruited for this study. In addition, we chose 10 healthy subjects as controls (Table I).
Table I
Clinical characteristics of IMN patients and normal controls
Group
IMN group
NC group
Age [years]
38.61 ±11.21
35.14 ±12.13
Sex (M/F)
7/3
7/3
Serum creatinine [µmol/l]
74.9 ±23.6
63.8 ±20.4
Proteinuria [g/24 h]
2.50 ±1.28
0.08 ±0.03
Serum albumin [g/l]
34.04 ±8.79
42.57 ±3.16
PLA2R (%)
60% (6/10)
0% (0/10)
NC group – normal control group.
Clinical characteristics of IMN patients and normal controlsNC group – normal control group.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: IMN patients were hospitalized at Shenzhen People’s Hospital nephrology department from November 2015 to October 2016. Renal biopsy confirmed that their pathological type was idiopathic membranous nephropathy and their kidney function was normal before and after admission.The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) patients with abnormal renal function based on increased urea nitrogen or creatinine; 2) secondary nephrotic syndrome patients, such as those with hypertensive nephropathy, diabetic nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and hepatitis-related nephritis; and 3) renal pathology results confirming membranous nephropathy, but the patient has co-occurrence of another disease that can cause renal damage, such as hypertension, diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatitis B and others.Collection of serum and urine specimens:All patients met the inclusion criteria and they were prohibited from eating or drinking the night before specimens were collected.Venous blood was collected the next morning from elbow vein blood and then kept at 37°C to promote coagulation.Samples were centrifuged for approximately 10 min at 3000 rpm.Approximately 2–3 ml of the upper layer of liquid was absorbed into the EP tube, which was marked with identification information (date, number, etc.) and then stored at –80°C.At the same time, the patient’s first morning urine (approximately 100 ml) was collected into a centrifuge tube, which was marked with identifying information (date, number, etc.) and then stored at –80°C.
Exosome isolation
Exosomes were isolated by the polymer formulation method [22] from blood serum using an ExoQuick reagent precipitation kit (System Biosciences, SBI, Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. This exosome isolation method has been well validated with other techniques, including electron microscopy [22, 23]. All exosomes were stored at –80°C immediately after isolation until further analysis. The total protein concentration of the isolated exosomes was determined using the standard Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Richmond, VA, USA).
Isolation of RNA from exosomes
Exosome supernatants were added to 40 pM synthetic cel-miR-39 (UCACCGGGUGUAAAUCAGCUUG) to control and normalize the efficiency of RNA extraction; then, they were transferred to RNase-free tubes for RNA isolation using an miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA sample was washed twice in 500 µl of RPE buffer and eluted in RNase-free water. The isolated RNA was measured using a NanoDrop 1000 ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) followed by quantitative PCR (qPCR).
Serum and urine exosome circRNA sequencing
The total RNA was extracted and then was digested with DNase I to remove rRNA; then, RNase R was used to remove the linear RNA, enriching the circRNAs. The circRNAs were fragmented, and the first strand cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription using random primers. Then, the second strand cDNA was synthesized using dNTP containing dUTP. The secondary chain product was subjected to terminal repair, and was pulsed “A” and a linker. The reaction mixture was digested with USER enzyme to remove the second strand cDNA containing dUTP, and a primer was added to amplify via PCR and obtain a chain-specific cDNA library. The fragments were screened by magnetic beads. Quality control was performed and fragments were further sequenced on a machine. The experimental procedure is summarized in Figure 1.
Figure 1
The main experimental process of circular RNA gene sequencing. QC1: detection of the total RNA concentration, purity, completeness; QC2: confirmed that more than 99% of the rRNA had been removed; QC3: confirmed that RNA was fragmented into approximately 200-bp fragments; QC4: detected the fragment concentration and size and library concentration. The distribution of the significantly differentially expressed miRNA of cells in the cellular component with high throughput sequencing
The main experimental process of circular RNA gene sequencing. QC1: detection of the total RNA concentration, purity, completeness; QC2: confirmed that more than 99% of the rRNA had been removed; QC3: confirmed that RNA was fragmented into approximately 200-bp fragments; QC4: detected the fragment concentration and size and library concentration. The distribution of the significantly differentially expressed miRNA of cells in the cellular component with high throughput sequencing
Bioinformatics analysis
The expression values calculated for the differential proteins and peptides were used for the distance and average to determine the linkage for gene ontology (GO) analysis. In pathway analysis, interactions between genes in the range of genomes were analyzed by downloading the pathway data in KEGG. Finally, the results of the above data were merged into a comprehensive gene inter-relationship network. The established gene network could directly reflect the inter-relationships between genes at a whole-cell level as well as the stability of the gene regulatory network.
Statistical analysis
The back-spliced junction reads and linear mapped reads were combined and scaled to reads per million mapped reads (RPM) to quantify circRNA expression levels. Differences in circRNA expression levels were analyzed using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Total RNA quality and concentration determination results
RNA was extracted and purified using an RNA isolation kit. The total RNA of the IMN and NC groups was detected with a Qubit3.0 fluorescence meter. The results are shown in Tables II and III. In the tables, the total amount of exosome RNA measured in each group was more than 200 ng, and the obtained circRNAs had high purity and good integrity, and could be used for later experiments.
Table II
Concentration of exosome total RNA
Sample name
Serum volume [ml]
Exosome RNA concentration [ng/µl]
Exosome RNA total amount [ng]
IMN group
28.7
9.69
242.30
NC group
23
33.40
400.80
IMN group – IMN group, NC group – normal control group.
Table III
Concentration of exosome total RNA
Sample name
Urine volume [ml]
Exosome RNA concentration [ng/µl]
Exosome RNA total amount [ng]
IMN group
980
16.50
445.50
NC group
970
16.70
367.40
IMN group – IMN group, NC group – normal control group.
Concentration of exosome total RNAIMN group – IMN group, NC group – normal control group.Concentration of exosome total RNAIMN group – IMN group, NC group – normal control group.
Types of circRNAs
Compared with the healthy control group, the types of circRNAs in the serum of the patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy decreased and mainly appeared as intron region sources. However, the circRNAs in the urinary exosomes increased, and mainly appeared to have an exon region source (Table IV).
Table IV
Species of exosome circRNA
Variable
IMN serum
IMN urine
NC serum
NC urine
Total number of circRNAs
85
286
227
12
Number of circRNAs from the circBase database
0
198
6
1
Number of circRNAs from the exon region
5
218
12
2
Number of circRNAs from the intron region
60
58
189
6
Number of circRNAs from the intergenic region
20
10
26
1
IMN group – IMN group, NC group – normal control group.
Species of exosome circRNAIMN group – IMN group, NC group – normal control group.
Difference analysis of circRNAs
According to the expression level of circRNAs, when the difference multiple (ratio) was more than 2 or less than 0.5 and FDR ≤ 0.001, the circRNAs were considered differentiated. In this study, the log2 ratio was used instead of multiple differences. The filter criteria of significantly differentially expressed genes were FDR ≤ 0.001 and |log2 ratio| ≥ 1.
Differential expression of circRNAs in serum and urine exosomes of IMN patients
According to the experimental results, there were 59 species of circRNA with significantly different expression compared to serum and urine exosomes in IMN patients; 32 species were up-regulated (Table V) and 27 species were down-regulated (Table VI). Most of these circRNAs had an intron source. The corresponding genes were mainly SNORA25, SNORA31, SNORA51, SNORA75 and other nucleolus small RNAs. The log2 ratio of chrY: 13688616|13833086 was 27.592 in the up-regulation circRNA, which was the most significant. The log2 ratio of chrY:13842647|13855594 was –26.379 in the down-regulation circRNA, which was the most significant. However, the two most significantly different circRNAs in the circBase gene pool had no corresponding gene, suggesting that they may be newly discovered genes.
Table V
Up-regulated circRNAs between the IMN serum and IMN urine
circRNA
Log2 ratio
Up/down
CircRNA type
Chromosome localization
Gene localization
chrY:13688616|13833086
27.592
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13650802|13725921
26.677
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13844080|13851741
25.449
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:114874721|114874739
24.936
Up
Intron
chr3
SNORA25
chr4:49133318|49151812
24.363
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA75
chr4:49133318|49151817
23.766
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA75
chr1:246981249|246981308
23.51
Up
Intron
chr1
SNORA25
chr6:39390231|39390251
23.444
Up
Intron
chr6
KIF6
chrY:13688616|13810318
23.251
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13867301|13869486
23.116
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:42154842|42154889
23.059
Up
Intron
chr3
TRAK1
chr8:70602312|70602409
22.531
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr4:49118019|49128722
22.398
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr10:39103465|39105726
22.302
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr8:70602353|70602431
22.029
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr8:70602360|70602427
21.967
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr10:39085864|39088295
21.903
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr1:91853081|91853139
21.766
Up
Intron
chr1
SNORA31
chrY:13684026|13844079
21.614
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:114874721|114874743
21.614
Up
Intron
chr3
SNORA25
chr8:70602355|70602427
21.531
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr4:49637530|49641867
21.351
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr4:49120156|49121084
21.351
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr8:70602312|70602382
21.351
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr17:22246001|22253301
21.351
Up
Intron
chr17
snoU13
chr21:10778969|10808326
21.251
Up
Intron
chr21
SNORA70
chr1:108113527|108113595
21.251
Up
Intron
chr1
SNORA31
chrY:13659053|13844079
21.144
Up
Intron
chrY
n/a
chr15:101250552|101250653
21.144
Up
Intron
chr15
snoU13
chr21:44593818|44593903
21.144
Up
Intergenic region
chr21
n/a
chr7:100550808|100551062
4.267
Up
Exon
chr7
MUC3A
chrY:13805036|13841134
3.876
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
NB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Table VI
Down-regulated circRNAs between the IMN serum and IMN urine
circRNA
Log2 ratio
Up/down
CircRNA type
Chromosome localization
Gene localization
chrY:13842647|13855594
–26.379
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13650802|13659298
–26.116
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr17:22248380|22253301
–25.516
Down
Intron
chr17
snoU13
chr8:43092760|43093139
–25.146
Down
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr8:43092873|43096758
–24.588
Down
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr4:90986390|90986415
–24.441
Down
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr4:49103783|49111822
–23.791
Down
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr10:39139428|39147131
–23.244
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr4:49641376|49652154
–23.221
Down
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr18:54265993|54266355
–23.079
Down
Exon
chr18
TXNL1
chr6:158779108|158779264
–22.894
Down
Intron
chr6
TULP4
chr2:19441309|19442090
–22.806
Down
Intron
chr2
SNORA51
chr3:96221435|96221837
–22.776
Down
Intron
chr3
SNORA25
chrY:13801063|13849765
–22.266
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr8:43095798|43096720
–21.976
Down
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr6:61899754|61913064
–21.806
Down
Intron
chr6
SNORD45
chr8:43093689|43097076
–21.681
Down
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr2:233244474|233272478
–21.614
Down
Intron
chr2
snoU13
chr2:221311242|221311332
–21.543
Down
Intron
chr2
SNORA75
chr20:30954187|30956926
–21.543
Down
Exon
chr20
ASXL1
chr4:35172567|35172590
–21.469
Down
Intron
chr4
SNORA75
chr6:2024936|2340390
–21.391
Down
Intron
chr6
snoU13
chr10:18831781|18831900
–21.309
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr10:42400571|42533897
–21.221
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr15:30465080|30465505
–21.128
Down
Intron
chr15
SNORA48
chr19:34882415|34883413
–3.063
Down
Intron
chr19
GPI
chrY:13691698|13851741
–1.454
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
NB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Up-regulated circRNAs between the IMN serum and IMN urineNB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.Down-regulated circRNAs between the IMN serum and IMN urineNB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Differential expression of circRNAs in serum exosomes of IMN and NC patients
According to the experimental results, there were 89 species of circRNAs with significantly different expression compared to IMN patients’ serum exosomes and NC patients’ serum exosomes; 49 species were up-regulated (Table VII) and 40 species were down-regulated (Table VIII). Most of these circRNAs had an intron source. The corresponding genes were mainly SNORA25, SNORA51, SNORA31, SNORA75, SNORD112 and other nucleolus small RNAs. The log2 ratio of chrY:13688616|13833086 was 27.592 in the up-regulation circRNAs, which was the most significant. However, the circRNAs in the circBase gene pool had no corresponding gene, which suggested that it may be a newly discovered gene. The log2 ratio of chr2:233244474|233272478 was –27.111 in the down-regulation circRNAs, which was the most significant, and the corresponding gene is the snoU13 gene. This gene is mainly expressed nucleolus small RNA and plays a role in RNA treatment and modification.
Table VII
Up-regulated circRNAs between the IMN and NC groups in serum
circRNA
Log2 ratio
Up/down
CircRNA type
Chromosome localization
Gene localization
chrY:13688616|13833086
27.592
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13650802|13725921
26.677
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:114874721|114874739
24.936
Up
Intron
chr3
SNORA25
chr4:49133318|49151812
24.363
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr4:49133318|49151817
23.766
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr6:39390231|39390251
23.444
Up
Intron
chr6
KIF6
chrY:13688616|13810318
23.251
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:42154842|42154889
23.059
Up
Intron
chr4
TRAK1
chr4:49118019|49128722
22.398
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr10:39103465|39105726
22.302
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr10:39085864|39088295
21.903
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr1:91853081|91853139
21.766
Up
Intron
chr1
HFM1
chrY:13684026|13844079
21.614
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:114874721|114874743
21.614
Up
Intron
chr3
SNORA25
chr8:70602355|70602427
21.531
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr4:49637530|49641867
21.351
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr4:49120156|49121084
21.351
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr17:22246001|22253301
21.351
Up
Intron
chr17
snoU13
chr21:10778969|10808326
21.251
Up
Intron
chr21
SNORA70
chr1:108113527|108113595
21.251
Up
Intron
chr1
SNORA51
chrY:13659053|13844079
21.144
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr15:101250552|101250653
21.144
Up
Intron
chr15
snoU13
chr21:44593818|44593903
21.144
Up
Intergenic region
chr21
n/a
chr2:5845511|5845954
20.766
Up
Intron
chr2
snoU13
chr4:70296654|70296710
20.614
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr7:71387989|71388027
20.614
Up
Intron
chr7
CALN1
chr16:47538682|47538754
20.614
Up
Intron
chr16
PHKB
chr19:34882415|34883413
20.444
Up
Intron
chr19
GPI
chr2:92305623|92309358
20.444
Up
Intron
chr2
SNORA75
chr20:59906635|59906776
20.251
Up
Intron
chr20
CDH4
chr1:91852914|91852996
20.029
Up
Intron
chr1
HFM1
chr10:38778641|38816581
20.029
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chrX:108297654|108297709
20.029
Up
Exon
chrX
CTD-2328D6.1
chr12:38237430|38502951
20.029
Up
Intron
chr12
SNORD112
chr20:59906715|59906776
19.766
Up
Intron
chr20
CDH4
chr14:70396886|70396954
19.766
Up
Intron
chr14
SMOC1
chr8:70602368|70602431
19.766
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr10:51358680|51636067
19.766
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr8:70602312|70602420
19.766
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr8:70602360|70602427
4.413
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chr1:246981249|246981308
3.955
Up
Intron
chr1
SNORA25
chr7:100550808|100551062
3.349
Up
Exon
chr7
MUC3A
chrY:13867301|13869486
2.807
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13805036|13841134
2.806
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr8:70602353|70602431
2.567
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chrY:13691698|13851741
2.522
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr8:70602312|70602409
2.276
Up
Intron
chr8
SLCO5A1
chrY:13844080|13851741
2.012
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13688616|13851691
1.936
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
NB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Table VIII
Down-regulated circRNA between the IMN and NC groups in serum
circRNA
Log2 ratio
Up/down
CircRNA type
Chromosome localization
Gene localization
chr2:233244474|233272478
–27.111
Down
Intron
chr2
snoU13
chr17:39537965|39552828
–26.966
Down
Intron
chr17
SCARNA20
chr22:42910112|42970824
–26.895
Down
Intron
chr22
Y_RNA
chr6:31122297|31122344
–26.054
Down
Exon
chr6
CCHCR1
chr12:52863454|52909616
–25.798
Down
Intron
chr12
SNORD112
chr19:36066505|36066634
–25.772
Down
Intron
chr19
SNORA70
chr4:1005136|1242947
–25.454
Down
Intergenic region
chr4
n/a
chr4:159973545|159973572
–25.028
Down
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chrY:13842647|13855594
–24.668
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr21:37558665|37558690
–22.588
Down
Intron
chr21
DOPEY2
chr15:31645251|31645272
–22.461
Down
Intron
chr15
KLF13
chr10:39139428|39141998
–22.387
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr17:39938846|39938869
–22.336
Down
Intron
chr17
JUP
chr17:22253135|22260437
–22.198
Down
Intron
chr17
snoU13
chr17:79502678|79502749
–21.981
Down
Intron
chr17
FSCN2
chr17:48266264|48272839
–21.912
Down
Exon
chr17
COL1A1
chr10:38804894|38818467
–21.894
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr1:74953936|74953971
–21.858
Down
Intron
chr1
TMEM56
chr5:116075463|116075487
–21.764
Down
Intron
chr5
SNORA70
chr18:18518121|18519655
–21.764
Down
Intron
chr18
SNORD112
chr7:148028455|148028529
–21.744
Down
Intron
chr7
CNTNAP2
chr2:189121958|189121979
–21.724
Down
Intron
chr2
SNORA48
chrX:3349826|3349848
–21.642
Down
Intron
chrX
snoU13
chr11:75979847|75979884
–21.599
Down
Intron
chr11
SNORA1
chr15:42134880|42134903
–21.509
Down
Exon
chr15
PLA2G4B
chr18:32291302|32291329
–21.387
Down
Intron
chr18
DTNA
chr13:36337738|36337787
–21.362
Down
Intron
chr13
SNORA25
chr17:31559413|31559527
–21.336
Down
Intron
chr17
ASIC2
chr9:19592476|19592555
–21.282
Down
Intron
chr9
SLC24A2
chr7:76626497|76626556
–21.282
Down
Intron
chr7
DTX2P1
chr8:124924619|124924638
–21.198
Down
Intron
chr8
FER1L6
chr1:7769121|7769144
–21.078
Down
Intron
chr1
CAMTA1
chr14:37211610|37211628
–21.046
Down
Intron
chr14
SLC25A21
chr1:32294226|32294254
–20.947
Down
Intron
chr1
SNORA70
chr17:31559408|31559527
–20.912
Down
Intron
chr17
ASIC2
chr19:56438931|56438947
–20.84
Down
Intron
chr19
NLRP13
chr1:155048684|155048737
–20.764
Down
Intron
chr1
EFNA3
chr20:46681136|46681159
–20.764
Down
Intron
chr20
snoU13
chr1:233454768|233454781
–20.764
Down
Intron
chr1
SNORA25
chr6:104238460|104238484
–3.592
Down
Intron
chr6
SNORA33
NB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Up-regulated circRNAs between the IMN and NC groups in serumNB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.Down-regulated circRNA between the IMN and NC groups in serumNB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Differential expression of circRNAs in urine exosomes of IMN and NC patients
According to the experimental results, there were 60 species of circRNAs with significantly different expression compared to IMN patients’ urine exosomes and NC patients’ urine exosomes; 54 species were up-regulated (Table IX) and 6 species were down-regulated (Table X). Approximately 55% were intron sources, 30% were exon sources and 15% were intergenic regions. The corresponding genes were mainly SNORA51, SNORA31, SNORA70, SNORA75, SNORD112 and other nucleolus small RNAs. The log2 ratio of chrY:13842647|13855594 was 26.379 in the up-regulated circRNA, which was the most significant. The log2 ratio of chrY:13688616|13833086 was –25.049 in the down-regulated circRNAs, which was the most significant. However, the two most significantly different circRNAs in the circBase gene pool had no corresponding gene, suggesting that they may be newly discovered genes.
Table IX
Up-regulated circRNAs between the IMN and NC groups in urine
circRNA
Log2 ratio
Up/down
CircRNA type
Chromosome localization
Gene localization
chrY:13842647|13855594
26.379
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chrY:13691698|13851741
26.006
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr17:22248380|22253301
25.516
Up
Intron
chr17
snoU13
chr8:43092760|43093139
25.146
Up
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr8:43092873|43096758
24.588
Up
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr4:49103783|49111822
23.791
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr19:34882415|34883413
23.507
Up
Intron
chr19
GPI
chr10:39139428|39147131
23.244
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr4:49641376|49652154
23.221
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA51
chr18:54265993|54266355
23.079
Up
Exon
chr18
TXNL1
chr6:158779108|158779264
22.894
Up
Intron
chr6
TULP4
chr2:19441309|19442090
22.806
Up
Intron
chr2
SNORA51
chr3:96221435|96221837
22.776
Up
Intron
chr3
SNORA25
chrY:13801063|13849765
22.266
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr8:43095798|43096720
21.976
Up
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr6:61899754|61913064
21.806
Up
Intron
chr6
SNORD45
chr8:43093689|43097076
21.681
Up
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chr2:233244474|233272478
21.614
Up
Intron
chr2
snoU13
chr2:221311242|221311332
21.543
Up
Intron
chr2
SNORA75
chr20:30954187|30956926
21.543
Up
Exon
chr20
ASXL1
chr4:35172567|35172590
21.469
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA75
chr6:2024936|2340390
21.391
Up
Intron
chr6
snoU13
chr10:18831781|18831900
21.309
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr10:42400571|42533897
21.221
Up
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr15:30465080|30465505
21.128
Up
Intron
chr15
SNORA48
chr21:10788458|10853762
21.029
Up
Intron
chr21
SNORA70
chr18:18518121|18519655
20.806
Up
Intron
chr18
SNORD112
chrY:13805036|13841134
20.806
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr3:196118684|196129890
20.681
Up
Exon
chr3
UBXN7
chr5:137320946|137324004
20.543
Up
Exon
chr5
FAM13B
chr9:137976113|137976207
20.543
Up
Intron
chr9
OLFM1
chr4:49101961|49155306
20.543
Up
Intron
chr4
SNORA75
chr11:33307959|33309057
20.391
Up
Exon
chr11
HIPK3
chr17:20107646|20109225
20.221
Up
Exon
chr17
SPECC1
chr19:7034465|7036161
20.221
Up
Intron
chr19
Y_RNA
chr8:141874411|141900868
20.029
Up
Exon
chr8
PTK2
chr8:99718695|99719539
20.029
Up
Exon
chr8
STK3
chr13:64330137|64398060
20.029
Up
Intron
chr13
SNORA25
chr8:43093228|43097076
20.029
Up
Intron
chr8
SNORD112
chrY:13140123|13456953
20.029
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr21:16386665|16415895
19.806
Up
Exon
chr21
NRIP1
chr10:32197100|32199491
19.806
Up
Exon
chr10
ARHGAP12
chr14:76633006|76662315
19.806
Up
Exon
chr14
GPATCH2L
chrY:13137990|13450019
19.806
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr21:10789780|10836717
19.543
Up
Intron
chr21
SNORA70
chr2:61749746|61761038
19.543
Up
Exon
chr2
XPO1
chr5:72370569|72373320
19.543
Up
Exon
chr5
FCHO2
chr1:180953813|180962561
19.543
Up
Exon
chr1
STX6
chr2:228252617|228252643
19.543
Up
Intron
chr2
SNORA75
chr2:202010101|202014558
19.543
Up
Exon
chr2
CFLAR
chr20:52773708|52788209
19.543
Up
Exon
chr20
CYP24A1
chr9:113734353|113735838
19.543
Up
Exon
chr9
LPAR1
chr6:4891947|4892613
4.346
Up
Exon
chr6
CDYL
chrY:13650802|13659298
1.893
Up
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
NB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Table X
Down-regulated circRNAs between the IMN and NC groups in urine
circRNA
Log2 ratio
Up/down
CircRNA type
Chromosome localization
Gene localization
chrY:13688616|13833086
–25.049
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
chr17:25267933|25267961
–23.323
Down
Intron
chr17
snoU13
chr10:39084961|39105726
–23.142
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr10:38787997|39138199
–22.485
Down
Intron
chr10
SNORA31
chr14:105944010|105944069
–20.583
Down
Intron
chr14
CRIP2
chrY:13688616|13851691
–1.126
Down
Intergenic region
chrY
n/a
NB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.
Up-regulated circRNAs between the IMN and NC groups in urineNB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.Down-regulated circRNAs between the IMN and NC groups in urineNB: Gene ID n/a indicates that there was no matched circRNA in the circBase gene bank.Target genes were analyzed for their potential functions using GO and KEGG pathways. GO analysis demonstrated that the target genes were associated with cellular processes, multicellular organisms, pigmentation, the development process and the response to stimuli at both serum and urine exosomes (Figures 2 and 3). Furthermore, significantly associated pathways comprising the target genes were obtained for the assessed circRNAs. Interestingly, we selected 29 metabolic pathways in the serum sample; of all 29 pathways, 21 had PLA abnormalities, and the corresponding gene was PLA2G4B. The top 20 signaling pathways are shown in Figure 4, while the platelet activation signaling pathway was the most widely distributed (Figure 5). In addition, we selected 35 metabolic pathways in the urine samples. The top 20 are shown in Figure 6, while the P13K-Akt signaling pathway was the most widely distributed (Figure 7).
Figure 2
GO annotation of differentially expressed circRNAs in the serum exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. GO annotation consisted of the biological process, cellular components, and molecular function
Figure 3
GO annotation of differentially expressed circRNAs in urine exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. GO annotation consisted of the biological process, cellular component, and molecular function
Figure 4
KEGG pathway analysis of predicted targets for differentially expressed circRNAs in serum exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. The bluer the circle, the more significant the pathway enrichment. The bigger the circle, the higher the number of pathway genes
Figure 5
Pathway analysis of differential genes: platelet activation. Red marks indicate the genes with differential profiles
Figure 6
KEGG pathway analysis of predicted targets for differentially expressed circRNAs in urine exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. The bluer the circle, the more significant the pathway enrichment. The bigger the circle, the higher the number of pathway genes
Figure 7
Pathway analysis of differential genes: the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Red marks indicate the genes with differential profiles
GO annotation of differentially expressed circRNAs in the serum exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. GO annotation consisted of the biological process, cellular components, and molecular functionGO annotation of differentially expressed circRNAs in urine exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. GO annotation consisted of the biological process, cellular component, and molecular functionKEGG pathway analysis of predicted targets for differentially expressed circRNAs in serum exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. The bluer the circle, the more significant the pathway enrichment. The bigger the circle, the higher the number of pathway genesPathway analysis of differential genes: platelet activation. Red marks indicate the genes with differential profilesKEGG pathway analysis of predicted targets for differentially expressed circRNAs in urine exosomes of IMN patients compared to the control group. The bluer the circle, the more significant the pathway enrichment. The bigger the circle, the higher the number of pathway genesPathway analysis of differential genes: the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Red marks indicate the genes with differential profiles
Discussion
Beck et al. [24] detected anti-PLA2R antibodies for the first time in IMN patient plasma samples. Substantial clinical data showed its specificity of up to 100% and sensitivity of approximately 70% to 80%, which indicated that they can be used as IMN-specific diagnostic markers.The latest study [24, 25] showed that the mannose-binding lectin pathway was the major complement activation in the pathogenesis of IMN. In this study, the mucin 3A (MUC3A) gene, corresponding to the circRNAs of chromosome 7 encoding chr7: 100550808|100551062 in the serum exosomes of IMN patients, was significantly up-regulated. It was also found that MUC3A was encoded by an exon-derived gene. Existing studies have shown that [26] MUC3A is a mucin cluster located on the 7p22 chromosome. Additionally, MUC3A belongs to a transmembrane glycoprotein. Authors [27] found that 71% of the amino acid repeated sequences encoded by MUC3 were serine/threonine and 6% proline. Studies have demonstrated that the activation of serine proteases is achieved by a change in specific amino acid residues in the center of serine-dominated activity [28]. Because most of the amino acids encoded by the MUC3A gene in this study were serine/threonine, we speculate that the MUC3A gene may encode the relevant amino acids and then play an important role in the pathogenesis of IMN through the mannose-binding lectin pathway. Previous evidence suggests that PLA2R-IgG4 can play a role by activating the complement lectin pathway with MBL [29]. The serine of the MUC3A gene also plays a role in the lectin binding pathway. Therefore, we further speculated that the MUC3A gene may be associated with IgG4 and anti-PLA2R antibody expression. There were some relationships in the diagnosis and prognosis of IMN. In addition, it was reported [30] that MUC3A is a class of membrane-associated mucins, which can mediate some of the particles and related pathogens adhering to the mucosal surface. Additionally, MUC3A is involved in binding of the receptor and ligand and signal transduction pathways. MUC3A can mediate the adhesion of the relevant particles to the membrane surface and participate in the receptor ligand binding process, suggesting that MUC3A may also play a role in the formation of immune complexes.In addition, in this experiment, the genes for which we observed a significant difference in the circRNAs are mainly intron-derived circRNAs. The corresponding genes are SNORA25, SNORA31, SNORA70, SNORA75, SNORD112 and other small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). An increasing number of studies have shown that snoRNAs can be further processed to form shorter RNA fragments, and these short fragments of snoRNAs have microRNA-like functions. This finding suggested that snoRNAs may act as microRNA precursors [31]. One study [32, 33] showed that circRNAs of different gene sources exist in different parts of the cell and the function is also different. The corresponding genes of circRNAs that we obtained in this experiment were mainly the intron source for coding snoRNAs. Therefore, we speculate that in the pathogenesis of IMN at the gene level, the circRNAs of the intron source may code snoRNAs that modify the mRNA during and before transcription as well as regulating the gene expression at the mRNA level.Studies have shown that alleles-PLA2R1 and HLA-DQA1 are closely related to IMN [34]. In this study, we selected 29 metabolic pathways in the serum sample; 21 had PLA abnormalities. IMN does not appear to occur through a specific signaling pathway; instead, several pathways appear to work at the same time. Additionally, the corresponding gene of PLA was PLA2G4B, which corresponds to PLA2R positivity in IMN patients. IMN may be associated with the PLA2G4B gene. Therefore, evaluation of PLA2G4B may provide new clues for the diagnosis and treatment of IMN.In conclusion, we found that there were abnormal expression levels of circRNAs in serum and urine exosomes in IMN patients. These circRNAs with abnormal expression could be involved in IMN pathogenesis. However, the specific mechanism and function of the circRNAs with differential expression in the disease require more direct evidence. However, with the continuous development of biological technology and continuous research on circRNAs, circRNAs will eventually provide a new theoretical basis in the disease diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Additionally, the study of PLA2G4B may provide new clues for the diagnosis and treatment of IMN.
Authors: Kevin C Miranda; Daniel T Bond; Mary McKee; Johan Skog; Teodor G Păunescu; Nicolas Da Silva; Dennis Brown; Leileata M Russo Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Horia C Stanescu; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Alan Medlar; Detlef Bockenhauer; Anna Kottgen; Liviu Dragomirescu; Catalin Voinescu; Naina Patel; Kerra Pearce; Mike Hubank; Henry A F Stephens; Valerie Laundy; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Anna Zawadzka; Julia M Hofstra; Marieke J H Coenen; Martin den Heijer; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Delphine Bacq-Daian; Benedicte Stengel; Stephen H Powis; Paul Brenchley; John Feehally; Andrew J Rees; Hanna Debiec; Jack F M Wetzels; Pierre Ronco; Peter W Mathieson; Robert Kleta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christin E Burd; William R Jeck; Yan Liu; Hanna K Sanoff; Zefeng Wang; Norman E Sharpless Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Laurence H Beck; Ramon G B Bonegio; Gérard Lambeau; David M Beck; David W Powell; Timothy D Cummins; Jon B Klein; David J Salant Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 91.245