| Literature DB >> 31108834 |
Poramin Chayaratanasin1,2, Allen Caobi3, Chaturong Suparpprom4, Sudarat Saenset5, Porntip Pasukamonset6, Nipattra Suanpairintr7, Manuel Alejandro Barbieri8, Sirichai Adisakwattana9.
Abstract
Clitoria ternatea (commonly known as blue pea) flower petal extract (CTE) is used as a natural colorant in a variety of foods and beverages. The objective of study was to determine the inhibitory effect of CTE on adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. The phytochemical profiles of CTE were analyzed by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Anti-adipogenesis effect of CTE was measured by using Oil Red O staining, intracellular triglyceride assay, quantitative real-time PCR and western blot analysis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Cell cycle studies were performed by flow cytometry. Lipolysis experiments were performed using a colorimetric assay kit. In early stages, CTE demonstrated anti-adipogenic effects through inhibition of proliferation and cell cycle retardation by suppressing expression of phospho-Akt and phospho-ERK1/2 signaling pathway. The results also showed that CTE inhibited the late stage of differentiation through diminishing expression of adipogenic transcription factors including PPARγ and C/EBPα. The inhibitory action was subsequently attenuated in downregulation of fatty acid synthase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase, causing the reduction of TG accumulation. In addition, CTE also enhanced catecholamine-induced lipolysis in adipocytes. These results suggest that CTE effectively attenuates adipogenesis by controlling cell cycle progression and downregulating adipogenic gene expression.Entities:
Keywords: Clitoria ternatea extract; adipocytes; adipogenesis; inhibition; lipolysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31108834 PMCID: PMC6571662 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101894
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1LC-MS/MS chromatogram of the Clitoria ternatea flower extract (CTE). (A) The expanded range of CTE chromatogram during 0–18 min. (B) The profile of CTE chromatogram (the number indicates isolated compounds).
Chromatographic MS and MS/MS data and the chemical structure of identified compounds in CTE.
| No. | Rt (min) | Compound | Product Ion |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 11.098 | Preternatin A3 | 1405.3310 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 1405.3876, MS/MS: 1329.2817, 1183.2193, 1021.2119, 876.1811, 739.1818, 627.1281, 493.3180, 471.3372 |
|
| 11.826 | Delphinidin derivatives | 788.4017 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 789.2084, MS/MS: 801.3825 [M + Na]+, [Quercetin 3-glucoside+dihexose] |
|
| 12.277 | Ternatin B2 | 1637.3591 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 1637.4248, MS/MS: 1389.3186, 757.1914, 611.1385, 465.0866, 303.0396 |
|
| 12.797 | Ternatin D2 | 1475.3163 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 1475.3720, MS/MS: 741.1967, 595.1441, 449.0916, 287.0456 |
|
| 13.040 | Quercetin-3-rutinoside (rutin) | 611.1384 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 610.1534, MS/MS: 465.0860, 303.0399 |
|
| 13.109 | Ternatin D1 | 1697.3959 [M + H − Malonyl]+, Calcd Mass: 1697.4612, MS/MS: 1389.3165, 1243.2461, 611.1379, 465.0855, 303.0396 |
|
| 13.664 | Kaemferol-3- | 741.1969 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 740.2164, MS/MS: 595.1443, 449.0924, 287.0457 |
|
| 14.080 | Delphinidin-3-glucoside (myrtillin) | 465.0856 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 465.1028, MS/MS: 487.0665 [M + Na]+, 303.0390 |
|
| 14.218 | Kaemferol-3- | 595.1437 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 594.1585, MS/MS: 588.3886, 566.4074, 449.0917, 287.0454 |
|
| 14.738 | Delphinidin-3- | 679.4869 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 679.1294, MS/MS: 701.4680 [M + Na]+, 595.1422, 340.2488 |
|
| 15.4311 | (+)-Catechin 7- | 453.3275 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 452.1319, MS/MS: 927.6276 [2M + Na]+, 905.6462 [2M + H]+, 814.5468 |
|
| 15.639 | Syringetin-3- | 509.8675 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 508.1217, MS/MS: 1040.7075 [2M + Na]+ |
|
| 16.402 | Quercetin triglycoside | 759.3755 [M + H]+, Calcd Mass: 758.1906, MS/MS: 781.3571 [M + Na]+ |
Figure 2Structures of identified compounds listed in Table 1.
Figure 3Effects of CTE on cell viability of 3T3-L1 cells by trypan blue assay at day 1 (A), day 3 (B) and day 9 (C). Each value represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 4Effects of CTE on cell cycle of 3T3-L1 cells at day 1. Histograms are shown as the control group (A), CTE 250 µg/mL (B), 500 µg/mL (C), 750 µg/mL (D). Each value represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Figure 5Effects of CTE on Akt (A) and ERK (B) pathway of 3T3-L1 cells at day 9. The relative values of P (phospho)-Akt1 (T308) to T (total)-Akt1 and P-ERK1/2 (T204/Y202) to T-ERK are shown in % of control. Each value represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). a p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Figure 6Effects of CTE on lipid accumulation and lipolysis of 3T3-L1 cells at day 9. Undifferentiated cells (A), differentiated cells (B) and 1000 µg/mL CTE (C) were stained by Oil red O (40× magnification). The quantification of lipid content is shown in % of control (D). Triglyceride content is shown in nmol/mg protein (E). Lipolysis is shown as glycerol release in nmol/mg protein/h (F). Each value represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). a p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Figure 7Effects of CTE on mRNA expression of PPARγ (A) and C/EBPα (B) of 3T3-L1 cells at day 9. The mRNA expression of PPARγ (A) and C/EBPα (B) are shown in relative values to beta-actin. Each value represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). a p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Figure 8(A) Effects of CTE on protein levels of adipogenic transcription factors of 3T3-L1 cells at day 9. The relative values of PPARγ (B), C/EBPα (C), FAS (D), ACC (E) to GAPDH are shown in % of control. Each value represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). a p < 0.05 compared with the control group.