Literature DB >> 31108372

Animal-assisted therapy for schizophrenia and related disorders: A systematic review.

Emma L Hawkins1, Roxanne D Hawkins2, Martin Dennis3, Joanne M Williams4, Stephen M Lawrie5.   

Abstract

Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is increasingly researched as a potential treatment for physical and mental illness, including schizophrenia. The aim of the current paper is to systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness of AAT for schizophrenia and related disorders. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CAB Abstracts, and Web of Science for RCTs of AAT for schizophrenia and related disorders. Primary outcomes were mental state and behaviour, clinical global response, and quality of life and wellbeing. Studies were eligible if they were RCTs that had compared AAT, or other animal-assisted intervention, to any control group using any participants with a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia (or related disorder), regardless of age, gender, setting, or severity and duration of illness. Seven studies were identified for the review. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of studies, including marked differences in outcome measures and interventions. Five out of seven studies included symptoms as an outcome measure, with one reporting improvements in negative symptoms and one study reporting improvements in positive and emotional symptoms. The remaining studies reported no significant effects of AAT. Three studies included quality of life as an outcome measure but did not find any significant effects. Two studies did, however, report improvements in various measures of self-view. The use of AAT for schizophrenia remains inconclusive and there is currently not enough evidence to draw any firm conclusions due to heterogeneity of studies, risk of bias, and small samples. Rigorous, large-scale RCTs are needed to assess the true impact of AAT on schizophrenia.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAT; Animal-assisted intervention; Negative symptoms; Randomised controlled trial; Self-view

Year:  2019        PMID: 31108372     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  4 in total

1.  Functional Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Animal-Assisted Therapy on Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Chyi-Rong Chen; Chi-Fa Hung; Yi-Wen Lee; Wei-Ting Tseng; Mei-Li Chen; Tzu-Ting Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The Efficacy of Animal-Assisted Therapy in Patients with Dual Diagnosis: Schizophrenia and Addiction.

Authors:  Miguel Monfort; Ana Benito; Gonzalo Haro; Alejandro Fuertes-Saiz; Monserrat Cañabate; Abel Baquero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Methodological and Terminological Issues in Animal-Assisted Interventions: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Antonio Santaniello; Francesca Dicé; Roberta Claudia Carratú; Alessia Amato; Alessandro Fioretti; Lucia Francesca Menna
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The Role of Animal Ownership for People with Severe Mental Illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study Investigating Links with Health and Loneliness.

Authors:  Emily Shoesmith; Panagiotis Spanakis; Emily Peckham; Paul Heron; Gordon Johnston; Lauren Walker; Suzanne Crosland; Elena Ratschen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.