OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of measuring extracellular pH in cartilage and meniscus using acidoCEST technique with a 3-dimensional ultrashort echo time readout (acidoCEST-UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry, radiofrequency (RF) power mismatch, and relative saturation transfer were evaluated in liquid phantoms for iopromide, iopamidol, and iohexol over a pH range of 6.2 to 7.8, at various agent concentrations, temperatures, and buffer concentrations. Tissue phantoms containing cartilage and meniscus were evaluated with the same considerations for iopamidol and iohexol. Phantoms were imaged with the acidoCEST-UTE MRI sequence at 3 T. Correlation coefficients and coefficients of variations were calculated. Paired Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The RF power mismatch and relative saturation transfer analyses of liquid phantoms showed iopamidol and iohexol to be the most promising agents for this study. Both these agents appeared to be concentration independent and feasible for use with or without buffer and at physiologic temperature over a pH range of 6.2 to 7.8. Ultimately, RF power mismatch fitting of iohexol showed the strongest correlation coefficients between cartilage, meniscus, and fluid. In addition, ratiometric values for iohexol are similar among liquid as well as different tissue types. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring extracellular pH in cartilage and meniscus using acidoCEST-UTE MRI is feasible.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of measuring extracellular pH in cartilage and meniscus using acidoCEST technique with a 3-dimensional ultrashort echo time readout (acidoCEST-UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry, radiofrequency (RF) power mismatch, and relative saturation transfer were evaluated in liquid phantoms for iopromide, iopamidol, and iohexol over a pH range of 6.2 to 7.8, at various agent concentrations, temperatures, and buffer concentrations. Tissue phantoms containing cartilage and meniscus were evaluated with the same considerations for iopamidol and iohexol. Phantoms were imaged with the acidoCEST-UTE MRI sequence at 3 T. Correlation coefficients and coefficients of variations were calculated. Paired Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to evaluate for statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The RF power mismatch and relative saturation transfer analyses of liquid phantoms showed iopamidol and iohexol to be the most promising agents for this study. Both these agents appeared to be concentration independent and feasible for use with or without buffer and at physiologic temperature over a pH range of 6.2 to 7.8. Ultimately, RF power mismatch fitting of iohexol showed the strongest correlation coefficients between cartilage, meniscus, and fluid. In addition, ratiometric values for iohexol are similar among liquid as well as different tissue types. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring extracellular pH in cartilage and meniscus using acidoCEST-UTE MRI is feasible.
Authors: Hye Jin Yoo; Sung Hwan Hong; Ja-Young Choi; In Joon Lee; Su Jin Kim; Jung-Ah Choi; Heung Sik Kang Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Elisabeth Springer; Klaus Bohndorf; Vladimir Juras; Pavol Szomolanyi; Štefan Zbýň; Markus M Schreiner; Benjamin Schmitt; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Brianna F Moon; Kyle M Jones; Liu Qi Chen; Peilu Liu; Edward A Randtke; Christine M Howison; Mark D Pagel Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: David A Walsh; Dan F McWilliams; Matthew J Turley; Madeleine R Dixon; Rebecca E Fransès; Paul I Mapp; Deborah Wilson Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-06-26 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Douglas W Goodwin; Youssef Zaim Wadghiri; Haoqin Zhu; Christopher J Vinton; Eric D Smith; Jeff F Dunn Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tuomo S Silvast; Harri T Kokkonen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Thomas M Quinn; Miika T Nieminen; Juha Töyräs Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Amy L Vāvere; Gráinne B Biddlecombe; William M Spees; Joel R Garbow; Dayanjali Wijesinghe; Oleg A Andreev; Donald M Engelman; Yana K Reshetnyak; Jason S Lewis Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Amir Masoud Afsahi; Sam Sedaghat; Dina Moazamian; Ghazaleh Afsahi; Jiyo S Athertya; Hyungseok Jang; Ya-Jun Ma Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 6.055
Authors: Alecio F Lombardi; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Saeed Jerban; Qingbo Tang; Adam C Searleman; Robert Scott Meyer; Jiang Du; Eric Y Chang Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 6.208