Elisabeth Springer1, Klaus Bohndorf, Vladimir Juras, Pavol Szomolanyi, Štefan Zbýň, Markus M Schreiner, Benjamin Schmitt, Siegfried Trattnig. 1. From the *High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, and †Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; ‡Siemens Healthcare Pty Ltd Australia, Imaging & Therapy Systems, Magnetic Resonance, Macquarie Park, New South Wales, Australia; §Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany; and ∥CD Laboratory for Molecular Clinical MR Imaging, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare quantitative and semiquantitative parameters (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] and diagnostic confidence) from a standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination with comparable sequence protocols and acquisition times at 3 T and at 7 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients experiencing knee pain of unknown etiology underwent comparable MR protocols with standard turbo-spin echo and short tau inversion recovery sequences of the knee joint (5 sequences) at 3 T and 7 T. For quantitative analysis, SNR was determined using these 5 sequences and 3 additional morphological sequences. For a semiquantitative assessment of diagnostic confidence, a diagnostic confidence score (DCS) was assigned, using a 10-point scale. Two experienced radiologists who specialized in musculoskeletal imaging and who were blinded to the field-strength independently assessed 22 potential pathological findings, in total, in 4 anatomically defined areas in the knee joint and rated their diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: In quantitative analysis, all sequences provided higher voxel-volume-adjusted SNR values at 7 T compared with that at 3 T. In semiquantitative analysis, summed DCS values for potential pathological findings in each of the 4 anatomically defined areas were higher at 7 T compared with that at 3 T. There was a statistically significant improvement in the DCS for both readers at 7 T for the diagnosis and exclusion of focal or diffuse grade I or II cartilage defects in the patellar cartilage. For 8 potential pathological findings, a statistically significant difference between the 2 field-strengths could be observed for 1 reader only. For the residual 13 potential pathological findings, there was no statistically significant difference observed. The percentage of concordant ratings was 84.6% at 3 T and 85.4% at 7 T. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-field MRI at 7 T improved the overall diagnostic confidence in routine MRI of the knee joint compared with that at 3 T. This is especially true for small joint structures and subtle lesions. Higher spatial resolution was identified as the main reason for this improvement.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare quantitative and semiquantitative parameters (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] and diagnostic confidence) from a standard knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination with comparable sequence protocols and acquisition times at 3 T and at 7 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients experiencing knee pain of unknown etiology underwent comparable MR protocols with standard turbo-spin echo and short tau inversion recovery sequences of the knee joint (5 sequences) at 3 T and 7 T. For quantitative analysis, SNR was determined using these 5 sequences and 3 additional morphological sequences. For a semiquantitative assessment of diagnostic confidence, a diagnostic confidence score (DCS) was assigned, using a 10-point scale. Two experienced radiologists who specialized in musculoskeletal imaging and who were blinded to the field-strength independently assessed 22 potential pathological findings, in total, in 4 anatomically defined areas in the knee joint and rated their diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: In quantitative analysis, all sequences provided higher voxel-volume-adjusted SNR values at 7 T compared with that at 3 T. In semiquantitative analysis, summed DCS values for potential pathological findings in each of the 4 anatomically defined areas were higher at 7 T compared with that at 3 T. There was a statistically significant improvement in the DCS for both readers at 7 T for the diagnosis and exclusion of focal or diffuse grade I or II cartilage defects in the patellar cartilage. For 8 potential pathological findings, a statistically significant difference between the 2 field-strengths could be observed for 1 reader only. For the residual 13 potential pathological findings, there was no statistically significant difference observed. The percentage of concordant ratings was 84.6% at 3 T and 85.4% at 7 T. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-field MRI at 7 T improved the overall diagnostic confidence in routine MRI of the knee joint compared with that at 3 T. This is especially true for small joint structures and subtle lesions. Higher spatial resolution was identified as the main reason for this improvement.
Authors: Felix P Kuhn; Georg Spinner; Filippo Del Grande; Michael Wyss; Marco Piccirelli; Stefan Erni; Pascal Pfister; Michael Ho; Bert-Ram Sah; Lukas Filli; Dominik A Ettlin; Luigi M Gallo; Gustav Andreisek; Andrei Manoliu Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2016-12-18 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Markus M Schreiner; Marcus Raudner; Stefan Marlovits; Klaus Bohndorf; Michael Weber; Martin Zalaudek; Sebastian Röhrich; Pavol Szomolanyi; Giuseppe Filardo; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig Journal: Cartilage Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 4.634