Sarah E Bosma1, Arjen H G Cleven, P D Sander Dijkstra. 1. S.E. Bosma, P.D.S Dijkstra, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands A.H.G. Cleven, Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anatomic and surgical complexity make pelvic and sacral bone sarcoma resections challenging. Positive surgical margins are more likely to occur in patients with pelvic and sacral bone sarcomas than in those with extremity sarcomas and are associated with an increased likelihood of local recurrence. Intraoperative navigation techniques have been proposed to improve surgical accuracy in achieving negative margins, but available evidence is limited to experimental (laboratory) studies and small patient series. Only one small historically controlled study is available. Because we have experience with both approaches, we wanted to assess whether navigation improves our ability to achieve negative resection margins. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Are navigated resections for pelvic and sacral primary bone sarcomas better able to achieve adequate surgical margins than nonnavigated resections? METHODS: Thirty-six patients with pelvic or sacral sarcomas treated with intraoperative navigation were retrospectively compared with 34 patients undergoing resections without navigation. All patients underwent resections between 2000 and 2017 with the intention to achieve a wide margin. Patients in the navigation group underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017; during this period, all resections of pelvic and sacral primary bone sarcomas with the intention to achieve a wide margin were navigation-assisted by either CT fluoroscopy or intraoperative CT. Patients in the control group underwent surgery before 2008 (when navigation was unavailable at our institution), to avoid selection bias. We did not attempt to match patients to controls. Nonnavigated resections were performed by two senior orthopaedic surgeons (with 10 years and > 25 years of experience). Navigated resections were performed by a senior orthopaedic surgeon with much experience in surgical navigation. The primary outcome was the bone and soft-tissue surgical margin achieved, classified by a modified Enneking system. Wide margins (≥ 2 mm) and wide-contaminated margins, in which the tumor or its pseudocapsule was exposed intraoperatively but further tissue was removed to achieve wide margins, were considered adequate; marginal (0-2 mm) and intralesional margins were considered inadequate. RESULTS: Adequate bone margins were achieved in more patients in the navigated group than in the nonnavigation group (29 of 36 patients [81%] versus 17 of 34 [50%]; odds ratio, 4.14 [95% CI, 1.43-12.01]; p = 0.007). With the numbers available, we found no difference in our ability to achieve adequate soft-tissue margins between the navigation and nonnavigation group (18 of 36 patients [50%] versus 18 of 34 [54%]; odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.35-2.27]; p = 0.995). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative guidance techniques improved our ability to achieve negative bony margins when performing surgical resections in patients with pelvic and sacral primary bone sarcomas. Achieving adequate soft-tissue margins remains a challenge, and these margins do not appear to be influenced by navigation. Larger studies are needed to confirm our results, and longer followup of these patients is needed to determine if the use of navigation will improve survival or the risk of local recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
BACKGROUND: Anatomic and surgical complexity make pelvic and sacral bone sarcoma resections challenging. Positive surgical margins are more likely to occur in patients with pelvic and sacral bone sarcomas than in those with extremity sarcomas and are associated with an increased likelihood of local recurrence. Intraoperative navigation techniques have been proposed to improve surgical accuracy in achieving negative margins, but available evidence is limited to experimental (laboratory) studies and small patient series. Only one small historically controlled study is available. Because we have experience with both approaches, we wanted to assess whether navigation improves our ability to achieve negative resection margins. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Are navigated resections for pelvic and sacral primary bone sarcomas better able to achieve adequate surgical margins than nonnavigated resections? METHODS: Thirty-six patients with pelvic or sacral sarcomas treated with intraoperative navigation were retrospectively compared with 34 patients undergoing resections without navigation. All patients underwent resections between 2000 and 2017 with the intention to achieve a wide margin. Patients in the navigation group underwent surgery between 2008 and 2017; during this period, all resections of pelvic and sacral primary bone sarcomas with the intention to achieve a wide margin were navigation-assisted by either CT fluoroscopy or intraoperative CT. Patients in the control group underwent surgery before 2008 (when navigation was unavailable at our institution), to avoid selection bias. We did not attempt to match patients to controls. Nonnavigated resections were performed by two senior orthopaedic surgeons (with 10 years and > 25 years of experience). Navigated resections were performed by a senior orthopaedic surgeon with much experience in surgical navigation. The primary outcome was the bone and soft-tissue surgical margin achieved, classified by a modified Enneking system. Wide margins (≥ 2 mm) and wide-contaminated margins, in which the tumor or its pseudocapsule was exposed intraoperatively but further tissue was removed to achieve wide margins, were considered adequate; marginal (0-2 mm) and intralesional margins were considered inadequate. RESULTS: Adequate bone margins were achieved in more patients in the navigated group than in the nonnavigation group (29 of 36 patients [81%] versus 17 of 34 [50%]; odds ratio, 4.14 [95% CI, 1.43-12.01]; p = 0.007). With the numbers available, we found no difference in our ability to achieve adequate soft-tissue margins between the navigation and nonnavigation group (18 of 36 patients [50%] versus 18 of 34 [54%]; odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.35-2.27]; p = 0.995). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative guidance techniques improved our ability to achieve negative bony margins when performing surgical resections in patients with pelvic and sacral primary bone sarcomas. Achieving adequate soft-tissue margins remains a challenge, and these margins do not appear to be influenced by navigation. Larger studies are needed to confirm our results, and longer followup of these patients is needed to determine if the use of navigation will improve survival or the risk of local recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Authors: Michaël P A Bus; Domenico A Campanacci; Jose I Albergo; Andreas Leithner; Michiel A J van de Sande; Czar Louie Gaston; Giuseppe Caff; Jan Mettelsiefen; Rodolfo Capanna; Per-Ulf Tunn; Lee M Jeys; P D Sander Dijkstra Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Mohamed Omar; Martin Schulze; Nico Bruns; Daniel Kotrych; Georg Gosheger; Max Ettinger Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Axel Sahovaler; Michael J Daly; Harley H L Chan; Prakash Nayak; Sharon Tzelnick; Michelle Arkhangorodsky; Jimmy Qiu; Robert Weersink; Jonathan C Irish; Peter Ferguson; Jay S Wunder Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2022-05-05