Literature DB >> 31106330

Limits in accuracy and a strategy of RNA structure prediction using experimental information.

Jian Wang1, Benfeard Williams2, Venkata R Chirasani1, Andrey Krokhotin2, Rajeshree Das3, Nikolay V Dokholyan1,2,4,5,6.   

Abstract

RNA structural complexity and flexibility present a challenge for computational modeling efforts. Experimental information and bioinformatics data can be used as restraints to improve the accuracy of RNA tertiary structure prediction. Regarding utilization of restraints, the fundamental questions are: (i) What is the limit in prediction accuracy that one can achieve with arbitrary number of restraints? (ii) Is there a strategy for selection of the minimal number of restraints that would result in the best structural model? We address the first question by testing the limits in prediction accuracy using native contacts as restraints. To address the second question, we develop an algorithm based on the distance variation allowed by secondary structure (DVASS), which ranks restraints according to their importance to RNA tertiary structure prediction. We find that due to kinetic traps, the greatest improvement in the structure prediction accuracy is achieved when we utilize only 40-60% of the total number of native contacts as restraints. When the restraints are sorted by DVASS algorithm, using only the first 20% ranked restraints can greatly improve the prediction accuracy. Our findings suggest that only a limited number of strategically selected distance restraints can significantly assist in RNA structure modeling.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31106330      PMCID: PMC6582333          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  70 in total

1.  RNA folding energy landscapes.

Authors:  S J Chen; K A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantifying the roughness on the free energy landscape: entropic bottlenecks and protein folding rates.

Authors:  Leslie L Chavez; José N Onuchic; Cecilia Clementi
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Deciphering protein dynamics from NMR data using explicit structure sampling and selection.

Authors:  Yiwen Chen; Sharon L Campbell; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Single-molecule correlated chemical probing of RNA.

Authors:  Philip J Homan; Oleg V Favorov; Christopher A Lavender; Olcay Kursun; Xiyuan Ge; Steven Busan; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Kevin M Weeks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A coarse-grained model with implicit salt for RNAs: predicting 3D structure, stability and salt effect.

Authors:  Ya-Zhou Shi; Feng-Hua Wang; Yuan-Yan Wu; Zhi-Jie Tan
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  A second molecular biology revolution? The energy landscapes of biomolecular function.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 7.  Principles of protein folding--a perspective from simple exact models.

Authors:  K A Dill; S Bromberg; K Yue; K M Fiebig; D P Yee; P D Thomas; H S Chan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 8.  Theoretical studies of protein folding.

Authors:  N Go
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1983

9.  ykkC riboswitches employ an add-on helix to adjust specificity for polyanionic ligands.

Authors:  Alla Peselis; Alexander Serganov
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Automated and fast building of three-dimensional RNA structures.

Authors:  Yunjie Zhao; Yangyu Huang; Zhou Gong; Yanjie Wang; Jianfen Man; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Improved gRNA secondary structures allow editing of target sites resistant to CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage.

Authors:  Stephan Riesenberg; Nelly Helmbrecht; Philipp Kanis; Tomislav Maricic; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Molecular Structure, Binding Affinity, and Biological Activity in the Epigenome.

Authors:  Balázs Zoltán Zsidó; Csaba Hetényi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Advances in RNA 3D Structure Modeling Using Experimental Data.

Authors:  Bing Li; Yang Cao; Eric Westhof; Zhichao Miao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.