Literature DB >> 31104990

Induction Chemotherapy Reduces Patient-reported Toxicities During Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.

Shu Y Ng1, Kathryn L Colborn2, Lajhem Cambridge1, Andrea Cercek3, Diane L Reidy-Lagunes3, Neil Segal3, Zsofia Stadler3, Leonard B Saltz3, Philip B Paty4, Jose Guillem4, Martin R Weiser4, Garrett Nash4, Julio Garcia-Aguilar4, Karyn A Goodman5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial treatment with either neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) or induction FOLFOX (5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy followed by CRT is considered standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. We compared patient-reported outcomes (PRO) during CRT in patients who had received induction chemotherapy versus those who did not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed records of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were treated with CRT between September 2009 and October 2014, and who had completed ≥ 4 PRO assessments during treatment. Clinician- and patient-reported toxicities were collected each week during treatment. We fit binomial generalized linear models to maximum toxicity scores across all patients' visits.
RESULTS: Of 123 patients with ≥ 4 PRO assessments, 87 (71%) patients reported a clinically meaningful PRO score of 3 or higher for diarrhea, and 91 (74%) patients reported a PRO score of ≥ 3 for urgency, during 1 or more weeks of treatment, corresponding to 'very frequent' or worse. Of 116 patients who had also completed ≥ 4 clinician-reported assessments for descriptive analysis, clinically significant diarrhea (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2) was reported in 9% of patients, and grade 2 proctitis and cystitis were reported in 20% and 4%, respectively. Eighty-four (68%) patients had undergone induction chemotherapy prior to CRT. Patients who received induction chemotherapy had 68% lower odds of experiencing significant urgency (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.95; P = .04), 76% lower odds of bleeding (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.1-0.62; P < .01), and 75% lower odds of tenesmus (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.6; P < .01) versus those treated with upfront CRT.
CONCLUSION: Based on PROs, a high proportion of patients experienced clinically significant symptoms during pelvic CRT, with diarrhea and urgency being most commonly reported. This appears to be under-reported on clinician-reported assessments. Delivery of induction chemotherapy was associated with lower odds of experiencing urgency, bleeding, and tenesmus on PROs during subsequent CRT, with no significant impact on diarrhea and rectal pain.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; Induction chemotherapy; Patient-reported outcomes; Rectal cancer; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31104990      PMCID: PMC6817304          DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  18 in total

1.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The emerging role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Patrick M Boland; Marwan Fakih
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-10

3.  Short course chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomized multicentric phase II study.

Authors:  R Maréchal; B Vos; M Polus; T Delaunoit; M Peeters; P Demetter; A Hendlisz; A Demols; D Franchimont; G Verset; P Van Houtte; J Van de Stadt; J L Van Laethem
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04.

Authors:  Michael J O'Connell; Linda H Colangelo; Robert W Beart; Nicholas J Petrelli; Carmen J Allegra; Saima Sharif; Henry C Pitot; Anthony F Shields; Jerome C Landry; David P Ryan; David S Parda; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Amit Arora; Lisa S Evans; Nathan Bahary; Gamini S Soori; Janice Eakle; John M Robertson; Dennis F Moore; Michael R Mullane; Benjamin T Marchello; Patrick J Ward; Timothy F Wozniak; Mark S Roh; Greg Yothers; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Cercek; Karyn A Goodman; Carla Hajj; Emily Weisberger; Neil H Segal; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Zsofia K Stadler; Abraham J Wu; Martin R Weiser; Philip B Paty; Jose G Guillem; Garrett M Nash; Larissa K Temple; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Leonard B Saltz
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant combined-modality chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 0012.

Authors:  Mohammed Mohiuddin; Kathryn Winter; Edith Mitchell; Nader Hanna; Albert Yuen; Charles Nichols; Robert Shane; Cherie Hayostek; Christopher Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin followed by synchronous chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision in magnetic resonance imaging-defined poor-risk rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ian Chau; Gina Brown; David Cunningham; Diana Tait; Andrew Wotherspoon; Andrew R Norman; Niall Tebbutt; Mark Hill; Paul J Ross; Alison Massey; Jacqueline Oates
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, locally advanced rectal cancer: Grupo cancer de recto 3 study.

Authors:  Carlos Fernández-Martos; Carles Pericay; Jorge Aparicio; Antonieta Salud; Mariajose Safont; Bertomeu Massuti; Ruth Vera; Pilar Escudero; Joan Maurel; Eugenio Marcuello; Jose Luis Mengual; Eugenio Saigi; Rafael Estevan; Moises Mira; Sonia Polo; Ana Hernandez; Manuel Gallen; Fernando Arias; Javier Serra; Vicente Alonso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Anorectal physiology and pathophysiology in the elderly.

Authors:  Siegfried W B Yu; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.076

10.  Elective clinical target volumes for conformal therapy in anorectal cancer: a radiation therapy oncology group consensus panel contouring atlas.

Authors:  Robert J Myerson; Michael C Garofalo; Issam El Naqa; Ross A Abrams; Aditya Apte; Walter R Bosch; Prajnan Das; Leonard L Gunderson; Theodore S Hong; J J John Kim; Christopher G Willett; Lisa A Kachnic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.