Monika Sieverding1,2, Nadine Ungar3, Alexandra Fleischmann3,4, Miruh Lee3, Haitong Zhang3, Margaux Mohnke3, Nicole K Specht3, Gerdi Weidner5. 1. University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. monika.sieverding@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Psychologisches Institut / Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. monika.sieverding@psychologie.uni-heidelberg.de. 3. University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. 5. San Francisco State University, Tiburon, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence and frequency of use of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors and to empirically identify categories of self-management. METHODS: Female cancer survivors (N=673, mean age 51 years; >90% with breast cancer; M=5 years since diagnosis) completed an Internet survey indicating the frequency (never to very often) with which they had employed each strategy since diagnosis. The survey included commonly assessed self-management strategies, such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), religious practices, and exercise. Additionally we assessed the use of further strategies identified from recommendations of cancer survivors shared in Internet forums. RESULTS: A principal component analysis yielded five categories: More Conscious Living, Turning to Family/Friends, CAM, Religious/Spiritual Practices, and Exercise. Prevalence rates of commonly measured strategies like CAM, Religious Practices, and Exercise were similar to previous studies. Considering frequency of use, however, revealed that only few participants reported frequent use of these strategies (<10%). In contrast, about half of the women (>50%) reported Turning to Family/Friends and engaging in More Conscious Living strategies (very) often. CONCLUSIONS: Relying on prevalence assessments of commonly investigated behaviors such as CAM or exercise may overestimate their use among cancer survivors. Cancer survivors engage in a wide range of self-management strategies. Encouraging living more consciously and cultivating social relations might be of greater relevance compared with CAM use or exercise.
OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence and frequency of use of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors and to empirically identify categories of self-management. METHODS: Female cancer survivors (N=673, mean age 51 years; >90% with breast cancer; M=5 years since diagnosis) completed an Internet survey indicating the frequency (never to very often) with which they had employed each strategy since diagnosis. The survey included commonly assessed self-management strategies, such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), religious practices, and exercise. Additionally we assessed the use of further strategies identified from recommendations of cancer survivors shared in Internet forums. RESULTS: A principal component analysis yielded five categories: More Conscious Living, Turning to Family/Friends, CAM, Religious/Spiritual Practices, and Exercise. Prevalence rates of commonly measured strategies like CAM, Religious Practices, and Exercise were similar to previous studies. Considering frequency of use, however, revealed that only few participants reported frequent use of these strategies (<10%). In contrast, about half of the women (>50%) reported Turning to Family/Friends and engaging in More Conscious Living strategies (very) often. CONCLUSIONS: Relying on prevalence assessments of commonly investigated behaviors such as CAM or exercise may overestimate their use among cancer survivors. Cancer survivors engage in a wide range of self-management strategies. Encouraging living more consciously and cultivating social relations might be of greater relevance compared with CAM use or exercise.
Entities:
Keywords:
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM); Conscious living; Female cancer survivors; Self-management strategies; Social relations
Authors: S G Brearley; Z Stamataki; J Addington-Hall; C Foster; L Hodges; N Jarrett; A Richardson; I Scott; M Sharpe; D Stark; C Siller; L Ziegler; Z Amir Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Ruth McCorkle; Elizabeth Ercolano; Mark Lazenby; Dena Schulman-Green; Lynne S Schilling; Kate Lorig; Edward H Wagner Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-01-04 Impact factor: 508.702