Young Ho Yun1,2, Ju Youn Jung1, Jin Ah Sim1, Hyewon Choi1, Jong Mok Lee3, Dong-Young Noh2,4, Wonshik Han2,4, Kyu Joo Park4, Seung-Yong Jeong4, Ji-Won Park4, Hong-Gyun Wu5, Eui Kyu Chie5, Hak Jae Kim5, June Hee Lee6, Zae Ill Zo7, Sung Kim8, Jeong Eon Lee8, Seok Jin Nam8, Eun Sook Lee3, Jae Hwan Oh3, Young-Woo Kim3, Young Tae Kim2,9, Young Mog Shim7. 1. Department of Biomedical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. 4. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 7. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 8. Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 9. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University of College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT), which we developed to enable cancer patients to assess their self-management (SM) strategies of health by themselves. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The development of the questionnaire included four phases: item generation, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. To assess the instrument's sensitivity and validity, we recruited 300 cancer patients from three Korean hospitals who were 18 or more years old and accustomed to using the Internet or email. Using the appropriate and priority criteria for pilot and field testing, we tightened the content and constructed the first version of the SAT. RESULTS: We developed the core strategies with 28 items, preparation strategies with 30 items, and implementation strategies with 33 items. Factor analysis of data from 300 patients resulted in core strategies with four factors, preparation strategies with five factors, and implementation strategies with six factors. All the SAT subscales demonstrated a high reliability with good internal consistency. The total scores of the three SAT sets differentiated participant groups well according to their stage of goal implementation and proportions of action of the 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior. Each factor of the three SAT sets correlated positively with the scores for additional assessment tool. CONCLUSION: The SAT is a three-set, 16-factor, 91-item tool that assesses the SM strategies of health that patients use to overcome a crisis. Patients can use the SAT to assess their SM strategies of health and obtain feedback from clinicians in the practice setting.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT), which we developed to enable cancerpatients to assess their self-management (SM) strategies of health by themselves. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The development of the questionnaire included four phases: item generation, construction, pilot testing, and field testing. To assess the instrument's sensitivity and validity, we recruited 300 cancerpatients from three Korean hospitals who were 18 or more years old and accustomed to using the Internet or email. Using the appropriate and priority criteria for pilot and field testing, we tightened the content and constructed the first version of the SAT. RESULTS: We developed the core strategies with 28 items, preparation strategies with 30 items, and implementation strategies with 33 items. Factor analysis of data from 300 patients resulted in core strategies with four factors, preparation strategies with five factors, and implementation strategies with six factors. All the SAT subscales demonstrated a high reliability with good internal consistency. The total scores of the three SAT sets differentiated participant groups well according to their stage of goal implementation and proportions of action of the 10 Rules for Highly Effective Health Behavior. Each factor of the three SAT sets correlated positively with the scores for additional assessment tool. CONCLUSION: The SAT is a three-set, 16-factor, 91-item tool that assesses the SM strategies of health that patients use to overcome a crisis. Patients can use the SAT to assess their SM strategies of health and obtain feedback from clinicians in the practice setting.
Authors: Young Ho Yun; Ju Youn Jung; Jin Ah Sim; JongMog Lee; Dong-Young Noh; Wonshik Han; Kyu Joo Park; Seung-Yong Jeong; Ji Won Park; Hong-Gyun Wu; Eui Kyu Chie; Hak Jae Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Jae-Ill Zo; Sung Kim; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam; Eun Sook Lee; Jae Hwan Oh; Young-Woo Kim; Young Tae Kim; Young Mog Shim Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: EunKyo Kang; Kyae Hyung Kim; Young Min Cho; Sang Min Park; Yong-Jin Kim; Hae-Young Lee; Ye Eun Rhee; Soojeong Kim; Young Ho Yun Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2020-11-10
Authors: EunKyo Kang; Sang Min Park; Kiheon Lee; Eun Bong Lee; Jae-Joon Yim; Jihye Lee; Soojeong Kim; Ye Eun Rhee; Young Ho Yun Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Young Ho Yun; EunKyo Kang; Young Min Cho; Sang Min Park; Yong-Jin Kim; Hae-Young Lee; Kyae Hyung Kim; Kiheon Lee; Hye Yeon Koo; Soojeong Kim; YeEun Rhee; Jihye Lee; Jeong Hee Min; Jin-Ah Sim Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 5.428