Matthew S Creamer1, Omer Mano2, Ryosuke Tanaka1, Damon A Clark3. 1. Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States. 2. Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States. 3. Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: damon.clark@yale.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To study visual processing, it is necessary to precisely control visual stimuli while recording neural and behavioral responses. It can be important to present stimuli over a broad area of the visual field, which can be technically difficult. NEW METHOD: We present a simple geometry that can be used to display panoramic stimuli. A single digital light projector generates images that are reflected by mirrors onto flat screens that surround an animal. It can be used for behavioral and neurophysiological measurements, so virtually identical stimuli can be presented. Moreover, this geometry permits light from the projector to be used to activate optogenetic tools. RESULTS: Using this geometry, we presented panoramic visual stimulation to Drosophila in three paradigms. We presented drifting contrast gratings while recording walking and turning speed. We used the same projector to activate optogenetic channels during visual stimulation. Finally, we used two-photon microscopy to record responses in direction-selective cells to drifting gratings. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Existing methods have typically required custom hardware or curved screens, while this method requires only flat back projection screens and a digital light projector. The projector generates images in real time and does not require pre-generated images. Finally, while many setups are large, this geometry occupies a 30 × 20 cm footprint with a 25 cm height. CONCLUSIONS: This flexible geometry enables measurements of behavioral and neural responses to panoramic stimuli. This allows moderate throughput behavioral experiments with simultaneous optogenetic manipulation, with easy comparisons between behavior and neural activity using virtually identical stimuli.
BACKGROUND: To study visual processing, it is necessary to precisely control visual stimuli while recording neural and behavioral responses. It can be important to present stimuli over a broad area of the visual field, which can be technically difficult. NEW METHOD: We present a simple geometry that can be used to display panoramic stimuli. A single digital light projector generates images that are reflected by mirrors onto flat screens that surround an animal. It can be used for behavioral and neurophysiological measurements, so virtually identical stimuli can be presented. Moreover, this geometry permits light from the projector to be used to activate optogenetic tools. RESULTS: Using this geometry, we presented panoramic visual stimulation to Drosophila in three paradigms. We presented drifting contrast gratings while recording walking and turning speed. We used the same projector to activate optogenetic channels during visual stimulation. Finally, we used two-photon microscopy to record responses in direction-selective cells to drifting gratings. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Existing methods have typically required custom hardware or curved screens, while this method requires only flat back projection screens and a digital light projector. The projector generates images in real time and does not require pre-generated images. Finally, while many setups are large, this geometry occupies a 30 × 20 cm footprint with a 25 cm height. CONCLUSIONS: This flexible geometry enables measurements of behavioral and neural responses to panoramic stimuli. This allows moderate throughput behavioral experiments with simultaneous optogenetic manipulation, with easy comparisons between behavior and neural activity using virtually identical stimuli.
Authors: Johannes D Seelig; M Eugenia Chiappe; Gus K Lott; Anirban Dutta; Jason E Osborne; Michael B Reiser; Vivek Jayaraman Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2010-06-06 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Aneysis D Gonzalez-Suarez; Jacob A Zavatone-Veth; Juyue Chen; Catherine A Matulis; Bara A Badwan; Damon A Clark Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 10.900
Authors: Margarida Agrochao; Ryosuke Tanaka; Emilio Salazar-Gatzimas; Damon A Clark Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 11.205