| Literature DB >> 31103040 |
Allison M Veach1, Reese Morris1, Daniel Z Yip1, Zamin K Yang1, Nancy L Engle1, Melissa A Cregger1, Timothy J Tschaplinski1, Christopher W Schadt2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plants have developed defense strategies for phytopathogen and herbivore protection via coordinated metabolic mechanisms. Low-molecular weight metabolites produced within plant tissues, such as salicylic acid, represent one such mechanism which likely mediates plant - microbe interactions above and below ground. Salicylic acid is a ubiquitous phytohormone at low levels in most plants, yet are concentrated defense compounds in Populus, likely acting as a selective filter for rhizosphere microbiomes. We propagated twelve Populus trichocarpa genotypes which varied an order of magnitude in salicylic acid (SA)-related secondary metabolites, in contrasting soils from two different origins. After four months of growth, plant properties (leaf growth, chlorophyll content, and net photosynthetic rate) and plant root metabolomics specifically targeting SA metabolites were measured via GC-MS. In addition, rhizosphere microbiome composition was measured via Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S and ITS2 rRNA-genes.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; ITS2; Metabolomics; Populus trichocarpa; Rhizosphere; Salicylic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31103040 PMCID: PMC6525979 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0668-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fig. 1Mean plant metabolites (± standard errors) – total phenolics (Panel a), salicylic acid (Panel b), tremuloidin (Panel c), and populin (Panel d) concentrations (μg g−1 fresh weight (FW)) in root tissues among genotypes and soil origin. X-axes are ordered based on rank of salicylate concentrations in descending order (BESC-289 > BESC-414). Orange bars denote secondary metabolites from genotypes grown in Clatskanie soils, whereas green bars denote Corvallis soils. Letters denote significant differences calculated from Tukey HSD tests among genotypes and soil origins. Tremuloidin only differed between soil origins therefore additional panel is included representing the mean tremuloidin concentrations across all genotypes grown in Clatskanie versus Corvallis soils (Panel c). Note Panel d Y-axis is on a logarithmic scale
Two-way ANOVA model summary for responses of Simpson’s Diversity and Evenness for bacteria/archaeal and fungal communities and explanatory variables of soil origin, genotype, and their interaction. Explanatory variables deemed statistically significant are bolded
| Response variable | Explanatory Variable | DF | F-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial/Archaeal Diversity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Bacterial/Archaeal Evenness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Fungal Diversity | Soil Origin | 1 | 0.39 | 0.54 |
| Genotype | 11 | 0.77 | 0.67 | |
| Interaction | 11 | 1.03 | 0.43 | |
| Fungal Evenness |
|
|
|
|
| Genotype | 11 | 1.16 | 0.32 | |
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 2Bacterial/archaeal and fungal diversity (Simpson’s Diversity: 1-D; Panel a, c) and Simpsons’s Evenness ( Panel b, d) in Clatskanie and Corvallis soil origins. Orange boxplots and points denote Clatskanie and green denotes Corvallis soils. Bacterial/archeal diversity and evenness was correlated with populin concentration in Corvallis soils (Panel e, f). Type-1 error rates given were generated by stepwise regression model analyses
Permutational Multivariate ANOVA results using Euclidean distance matrices for bacterial/archaeal and fungal communities and soil origin (Corvallis, Clatskanie soil), genotype, and their interaction. Raw OTU counts were centered log-ratio transformed prior to Euclidean distance calculations. 999 permutations were used to calculate significance values
| Community | Source of variation | R2 | Pseudo-F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Residuals | 0.33 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Residuals | 0.46 |
Explanatory variables deemed statistically significant are bold
Fig. 3Non-metric dimensional scaling ordination for bacteria/archaea (a) and fungi (b) among twelve genotypes and between Clatskanie and Corvallis soil origins. Points represent mean ordination scores (i.e., the centroid, ± standard errors) with colors denoting genotype and shape denoting soil origin. Circles represent microbial communities grown in Clatskanie soils and triangles represent Corvallis soils. Soil origin and genotype explained a large proportion of variation in community composition for both bacteria/archaea (~ 59%) and fungi (~ 45%; Table 3). Stress scores were ~ 0.06 for both bacteria/archaea and fungal community ordinations
Fig. 4The relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla (class for Proteobacteria) and families within soil origins (Panel a, b) and among genotypes (Panel c, d). Asterisks denote significant differences in abundance between soil origins or genotype generated by two-way ANOVA models and with an FDR-statistical correction applied. Raw counts were centered log-ratio transformed prior to ANOVA models. Due to a large portion of reads belonging to non-dominant families (> 50% all reads), an “Other” category is used for clarity
Fig. 5The relative abundance of dominant fungal phyla and families within soil origins (Panel a, b) and among genotypes (Panel c, d). Asterisks denote significant differences in abundance between soil origins or genotype generated by two-way ANOVA models and with an FDR-statistical correction applied. Raw counts were centered log-ratio transformed prior to ANOVA models. Due to a large portion of reads belonging to non-dominant families an “Other” category is used for clarity
Multiple stepwise regression model results for dominant bacterial and fungal phyla (and classes for Proteobacteria) that significantly correlated with a secondary metabolites. Soil origin was also included as an explanatory variable to discern metabolite versus soil effects. Raw abundances were centered log-ratio transformed prior to analysis. Type-1 error rates given are FDR-corrected
| Full model statistics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microbial Phylum | Explanatory variable | T |
| F-statistic | Adj. R2 | |
| Bacteria | ||||||
| | Intercept | 67.3 | < 0.01 | 13.07 | 0.19 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 17.99 | < 0.01 | 21.99 | 0.38 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
| catechin | 1.74 | 0.09 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 70.39 | < 0.01 | 51.94 | 0.6 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
| saliyclic acid | −1.49 | 0.14 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 45.92 | < 0.01 | 25.79 | 0.42 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| populin | −1.85 | 0.07 | ||||
| | Intercept | 62.91 | < 0.01 | 22.79 | 0.39 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 36.34 | < 0.01 | 10.82 | 0.22 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
| salicylic acid | −1.82 | 0.07 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 48.68 | < 0.01 | 41.9 | 0.45 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 45.06 | < 0.01 | 7.65 | 0.12 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| | Intercept | 7.93 | < 0.01 | 3 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| populin | −1.53 | 0.13 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
| Fungi | ||||||
| | Intercept | 24.9 | < 0.01 | 5.96 | 0.09 | < 0.01 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
Explanatory variables deemed statistically significant are bold