| Literature DB >> 31100936 |
Anna Rachel Young1, Jessica Da Gama Duarte2,3, Rhiannon Coulson4, Megan O'Brien5,6, Siddhartha Deb7, Alex Lopata8, Andreas Behren9,10, Suresh Mathivanan11, Elgene Lim12, Els Meeusen13,14.
Abstract
Tumor antigens are responsible for initiating an immune response in cancer patients, and their identification may provide new biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and targets for immunotherapy. The general use of serum antibodies to identify tumor antigens has several drawbacks, including dilution, complex formation, and background reactivity. In this study, antibodies were generated from antibody-secreting cells (ASC) present in tumor-draining lymph nodes of 20 breast cancer patients (ASC-probes) and were used to screen breast cancer cell lines and protein microarrays. Half of the ASC-probes reacted strongly against extracts of the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line, but each with a distinct antigen recognition profile. Three of the positive ASC-probes reacted differentially with recombinant antigens on a microarray containing cancer-related proteins. The results of this study show that lymph node-derived ASC-probes provide a highly specific source of tumor-specific antibodies. Each breast cancer patient reacts with a different antibody profile which indicates that targeted immunotherapies may need to be personalized for individual patients. Focused microarrays in combination with ASC-probes may be useful in providing immune profiles and identifying tumor antigens of individual cancer patients.Entities:
Keywords: antibody secreting cell; biomarker; breast cancer; immune profile; immunotherapy; lymph node; microarray; tumor antigen
Year: 2019 PMID: 31100936 PMCID: PMC6562983 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Clinical characteristics of patients.
| Patient | Age | Tumor Grade | ER | PR | HER2 | TNM Classification | Tumor Size (mm) | Pathological Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | 2 | + | + | neg | T2N1M0 | 33 | IDC |
| 2 | 49 | 1 | + | + | neg | T2N2M0 | 26 | Invasive micropapillary carcinoma |
| 3 | 42 | 3 | + | + | 2+ | T2N2M0 | 28 | IDC |
| 4 | 44 | 3 | neg | neg | 3+ | T3N2M0 | 65 | IDC |
| 5 | 66 | 3 | neg | neg | 3+ | T1N1M0 | 15 and 4.5 | IDC, multifocal |
| 6 | 58 | 3 | neg | neg | 2+ | TXN2M0 | NA | Occult Primary Breast Cancer |
| 7 | 73 | 2 | + | + | neg | T3N2M1 | 110 | IDC |
| 8 | 72 | 3 | + | + | neg | T2N1M0 | 22 | IDC |
| 9 | 78 | 2 | + | + | neg | TXN3M0 | NA | ILC |
| 10 | 44 | 2 | + | + | neg | T4N3M0 | 70 | IDC, multifocal |
| 11 | 58 | 1 | + | + | neg | T2N1M0 | 25 | IDC |
| 12 | 60 | 2 | + | + | neg | T3N2M0 | 60 | IDC |
| 13 | 63 | 3 | + | + | 2+ | T1N1M0 | 13 | IDC |
| 14 | 71 | 3 | + | + | neg | T4N2M0 | 60 | ILC |
| 15 | 64 | 3 | + | + | neg | T2N2M0 | 65 and 13 | IDC, multifocal |
| 16 | 45 | 3 | + | + | neg | T2N2M0 | 25 and 15 | IDC, multifocal |
| 17 | 39 | 3 | neg | neg | 3+ | NA | 4 (DCIS) | Residual DCIS post preoperative chemotherapy. |
| 18 | 60 | 3 | + | neg | 3+ | T2N1M0 | 40 | IDC |
| 19 | 39 | 3 | NA | NA | NA | T2N1M0 | 32 | IDC |
| 20 | 75 | 2 | + | + | neg | T2N2M0 | 21 + 15 | IDC, multifocal |
Abbreviations: ER: estrogen receptor, PR: progesterone receptor, HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, IDC: Invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC: Infiltrating lobular carcinoma, ISH: In situ hybridization; NA: Not available.
IgG concentration and relative strength of reactivity of ASC-probes of 20 breast cancer patients.
| Patient | µg IgG/mL | Relative Reactivity Ratio ASC-Probe/Control 1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soluble (S) | Insoluble (I) | Total (Ratio S/I) | ||
| Strong | ||||
| 6 | 5.882 | 12.69 | 11.54 | 24.23 (1.2) |
| 12 | 0.902 | 15.82 | 3.34 | 19.16 (4.7) |
| 3 | 3.6 | 12.33 | 6.58 | 18.92 (1.9) |
| 16 | 0.453 | 5.52 | 3.20 | 8.72 (1.7) |
| 20 | 1.150 | 2.29 | 5.04 | 7.34 (0.5) |
| 15 | 0.396 | 1.44 | 3.21 | 4.66 (0.4) |
| 14 | 0.341 | 3.90 | 2.04 | 5.94 (1.9) |
| 17 | 0.790 | 3.59 | 1.60 | 5.20 (2.2) |
| 2 | 0.468 | 2.47 | 1.71 | 4.18 (1.4) |
| 13 | 0.423 | 3.26 | 1.77 | 5.03 (1.8) |
| Weak/negative | ||||
| 7 | 0.549 | 1.85 | 1.44 | 3.29 (1.3) |
| 8 | 0.421 | 2.10 | 1.35 | 3.45 (1.6) |
| 18 | 0.760 | 1.53 | 1.04 | 2.57 (1.5) |
| 1 | 0.174 | 0.79 | 1.20 | 1.99 (0.7) |
| 10 | 0.207 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.28 (0.9) |
| 5 | 0.173 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.2 (0.6) |
| 19 | 1.060 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.50 (1.0) |
| 4 | 0.188 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.6 (1.3) |
| 9 | 0.539 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 1.80 (1.0) |
| 11 | 0.912 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 1.55 (1.3) |
1 Relative reactivity was determined by density scans of individual antibody-secreting cell (ASC)-probe Western blots against MCF-7 soluble or insoluble cell extract, divided by similar control blots.
Figure 1One-dimensional (1D) Western blots of soluble (A) and insoluble (B) fractions of MCF-7 cell extracts screened with antibody-secreting cell (ASC)-probes from 20 breast cancer patients. Molecular weight markers on the left are recorded from prestained markers (a) and the adjacent lane (b) shows the coomassie stained cell extract. Control lanes on the right are screened with serum from healthy women (a) or secondary antibody conjugate only (b). White bands are the result of extremely high levels of localized signal.
Figure 21D Western blots of soluble (sn) and insoluble (p) extracts of different cancer cell lines screened with a pool of antibody-secreting cell (ASC)-probes (left panel) or control serum (right panel).
Figure 3Microarray screening of 10 antibody-secreting cell (ASC)-probes and 3 matching sera/plasma.