BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a highly sensitive tool for the detection of prostate cancer metastases. However, the effect of primary and secondary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on PSMA PET uptake has not been described. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate changes in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake on initiation of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive (n=4) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (n=4) starting treatment with ADT and enzalutamide, respectively, who underwent serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging before and after treatment initiation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The percentage change in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake from baseline was descriptively reported and graphically represented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Early increases in PSMA PET tracer uptake in at least one metastatic lesion were observed in six out of seven patients who achieved subsequent prostate-specific antigen declines of >50% from baseline. Overall, 22 of 45 metastatic lesions (49%) exhibited early increases in PSMA uptake that were indicative of a flare effect rather than disease progression. Considerable intra- and interpatient heterogeneity was observed in the temporal pattern of PSMA uptake on treatment initiation. Study limitations include the sample size, the variable timing for scan acquisition, and limited long-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor flare in PSMA PET tracer uptake in the absence of disease progression is variably observed on initiation of AR-targeted treatment. Further studies are needed to delineate the factors controlling PSMA expression to optimize the diagnostic yield. PATIENT SUMMARY: Flares of increased prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracer uptake on positron emission tomography scans are variably observed following initiation of hormone therapy for prostate cancer and do not necessarily represent disease progression. There was considerable variability in PSMA expression between patients, and further studies are needed to understand the factors controlling PSMA expression.
BACKGROUND:Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a highly sensitive tool for the detection of prostate cancer metastases. However, the effect of primary and secondary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on PSMA PET uptake has not been described. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate changes in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake on initiation of androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive (n=4) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (n=4) starting treatment with ADT and enzalutamide, respectively, who underwent serial 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging before and after treatment initiation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The percentage change in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake from baseline was descriptively reported and graphically represented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Early increases in PSMA PET tracer uptake in at least one metastatic lesion were observed in six out of seven patients who achieved subsequent prostate-specific antigen declines of >50% from baseline. Overall, 22 of 45 metastatic lesions (49%) exhibited early increases in PSMA uptake that were indicative of a flare effect rather than disease progression. Considerable intra- and interpatient heterogeneity was observed in the temporal pattern of PSMA uptake on treatment initiation. Study limitations include the sample size, the variable timing for scan acquisition, and limited long-term follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor flare in PSMA PET tracer uptake in the absence of disease progression is variably observed on initiation of AR-targeted treatment. Further studies are needed to delineate the factors controlling PSMA expression to optimize the diagnostic yield. PATIENT SUMMARY: Flares of increased prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracer uptake on positron emission tomography scans are variably observed following initiation of hormone therapy for prostate cancer and do not necessarily represent disease progression. There was considerable variability in PSMA expression between patients, and further studies are needed to understand the factors controlling PSMA expression.
Authors: Sofia Vaz; Boris Hadaschik; Michael Gabriel; Ken Herrmann; Matthias Eiber; Durval Costa Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Simona Malaspina; Otto Ettala; Tuula Tolvanen; Johan Rajander; Olli Eskola; Peter J Boström; Jukka Kemppainen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-09-26 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Florian Rosar; Sebastian Dewes; Martin Ries; Andrea Schaefer; Fadi Khreish; Stephan Maus; Hendrik Bohnenberger; Johannes Linxweiler; Mark Bartholomä; Carsten Ohlmann; Samer Ezziddin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jyoti Roy; Margaret E White; Falguni Basuli; Ana Christina L Opina; Karen Wong; Morgan Riba; Anita T Ton; Xiang Zhang; Keith H Jansson; Elijah Edmondson; Donna Butcher; Frank I Lin; Peter L Choyke; Kathleen Kelly; Elaine M Jagoda Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Katherine A Zukotynski; Urban Emmenegger; Sebastien Hotte; Anil Kapoor; Wei Fu; Amanda L Blackford; John Valliant; François Bénard; Chun K Kim; Mark C Markowski; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Kenneth J Pienta; Michael A Gorin; Matthew Lubanovic; Jihyun Kim; Martin G Pomper; Steve Y Cho; Steven P Rowe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Mark C Markowski; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Mario A Eisenberger; Martin G Pomper; Kenneth J Pienta; Michael A Gorin; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Samuel R Denmeade; Steven P Rowe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Francesco Ceci; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Louise Emmett; Judit A Adam; Jamshed Bomanji; Johannes Czernin; Matthias Eiber; Uwe Haberkorn; Michael S Hofman; Thomas A Hope; Rakesh Kumar; Steven P Rowe; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Stefano Fanti; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 9.236