Literature DB >> 31100117

The impact of selection using residual average daily gain and marbling EPDs on growth, performance, and carcass traits in Angus steers1.

Rachael A Detweiler1, T Dean Pringle1, Romdhane Rekaya1, Jonathan B Wells2, Jacob R Segers1,3.   

Abstract

One hundred ninety-one Angus steers (age = 546 d ± 33.5; BW = 36.4 kg ± 4.2), sired by bulls divergently selected for feed efficiency over a 3-yr period, were used to compare growth, efficiency, body composition, and carcass characteristics. Selected Angus sires were either high (Hi) or low (Lo) for residual average daily gain (RADG) expected progeny differences (EPDs) and either high (Hi) or low (AVG; breed average) for marbling (MARB) EPDs. Steer weight and body composition, via ultrasound, were measured at weaning (205 d) and at 1 yr (365 d) of age. Steers entered the feedlot at 454 d of age and completed a 70-d GROWSAFE BEEF System evaluation to determine DMI, ADG, and residual feed intake (RFI). Steers were then slaughtered as they reached a backfat thickness of 1.3 cm. Carcasses were chilled for 48 h at 2 °C, ribbed, and USDA yield and quality grade data were collected. The right side of the carcass was fabricated and primal and subprimal weights were collected. A 2.5-cm longissimus steak was removed, vacuum-packaged, aged for 14 d, and frozen for slice shear force determination. Additionally, a 1.3-cm longissimus steak was removed from year 3 steers for proximate analysis. The GLM procedure of SAS was used and the main effects of RADG and MARB and their interaction were tested by the error term, SIRE(RADG*MARB). Year was evaluated as a replicate. Weight, ultrasound backfat, and REA were increased (P ≤ 0.05) at weaning in the Hi compared with AVG MARB steers. Feed efficiency, measured by RFI, was improved (P = 0.05) in the Hi RADG steers compared with Lo RADG steers. Slaughter weight and HCW were heavier (P ≤ 0.03) in the Hi RADG steers compared with Lo RADG steers. An interaction (P = 0.05) between RADG and MARB selection was found for marbling score, steers selected for Lo RADG and Hi MARB had greater marbling scores than all other groups. Longissimus proximate composition from year 3 showed that lipid content was greater (P < 0.01) in the Hi MARB and Lo RADG groups compared with the AVG MARB and Hi RADG groups, respectively. These findings suggest that selection using RADG or MARB EPDs has minimal impact on carcass yield. However, positive selection pressure placed on these breeding values can potentially improve efficiency and carcass quality. Lastly, it appears that improvements in feed efficiency can be obtained without negatively affecting beef carcass merit, especially USDA quality grade.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angus; carcass; marbling; residual average daily gain

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100117      PMCID: PMC6541813          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle.

Authors:  P F Arthur; J A Archer; D J Johnston; R M Herd; E C Richardson; P F Parnell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of selection for ultrasound intramuscular fat percentage in Angus bulls on carcass traits of progeny.

Authors:  R L Sapp; J K Bertrand; T D Pringle; D E Wilson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers.

Authors:  P A Lancaster; G E Carstens; D H Crews; T H Welsh; T D A Forbes; D W Forrest; L O Tedeschi; R D Randel; F M Rouquette
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Use of expected progeny differences for marbling in beef: II. Carcass and palatability traits.

Authors:  B L Gwartney; C R Calkins; R J Rasby; R A Stock; B A Vieselmeyer; J A Gosey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Tenderness classification of beef: I. Evaluation of beef longissimus shear force at 1 or 2 days postmortem as a predictor of aged beef tenderness.

Authors:  S D Shackelford; T L Wheeler; M Koohmaraie
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  A prototype national cattle evaluation for feed intake and efficiency of Angus cattle.

Authors:  M D MacNeil; N Lopez-Villalobos; S L Northcutt
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Estimates of genetic parameters for live animal ultrasound, actual carcass data, and growth traits in beef cattle.

Authors:  J W Arnold; J K Bertrand; L L Benyshek; C Ludwig
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle.

Authors:  Megan M Rolf; Jeremy F Taylor; Robert D Schnabel; Stephanie D McKay; Matthew C McClure; Sally L Northcutt; Monty S Kerley; Robert L Weaber
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.797

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.

Authors:  Christina B Welch; Jeferson M Lourenco; Dylan B Davis; Taylor R Krause; Mia N Carmichael; Michael J Rothrock; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Fecal Microbiome Differences in Angus Steers with Differing Feed Efficiencies during the Feedlot-Finishing Phase.

Authors:  Jeferson M Lourenco; Christina B Welch; Taylor R Krause; Michael A Wieczorek; Francis L Fluharty; Michael J Rothrock; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Longitudinal Changes of the Ruminal Microbiota in Angus Beef Steers.

Authors:  Jeferson M Lourenco; Taylor R Krause; Christina B Welch; Todd R Callaway; T Dean Pringle
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Evaluation of the Fecal Bacterial Communities of Angus Steers With Divergent Feed Efficiencies Across the Lifespan From Weaning to Slaughter.

Authors:  Christina B Welch; Jeferson M Lourenco; Taylor R Krause; Darren S Seidel; Francis L Fluharty; T Dean Pringle; Todd R Callaway
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.