| Literature DB >> 31100064 |
Thanh Vinh Pham1,2, Hong Van Nguyen1, Angel Rosas Aguirre2,3,4, Van Van Nguyen5, Mario A Cleves6, Xa Xuan Nguyen1, Thao Thanh Nguyen7, Duong Thanh Tran1, Hung Xuan Le1, Niel Hens8,9, Anna Rosanas-Urgell10, Umberto D'Alessandro11, Niko Speybroeck2, Annette Erhart11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Vietnam, the importance of vivax malaria relative to falciparum during the past decade has steadily increased to 50%. This, together with the spread of multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum, is a major challenge for malaria elimination. A 2-year prospective cohort study to assess P. vivax morbidity after radical cure treatment and related risk factors was conducted in Central Vietnam. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31100064 PMCID: PMC6524795 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Med ISSN: 1549-1277 Impact factor: 11.069
Fig 1Study profile.
CQ, chloroquine; d, day; LCF, Late Clinical Failure; LM, light microscopy; LPF, Late Parasitological Failure; m, month; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PQ, primaquine.
Baseline characteristics of the 260 patients enrolled in the cohort.
| Variables | % | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Village 1 | 101 | 38.85 | [34.83; 43.02] |
| Village 2 | 64 | 24.62 | [21.25; 28.33] |
| Village 3 | 39 | 15.00 | [12.84; 17.45] |
| Village 4 | 56 | 21.54 | [17.63; 26.04] |
| Male | 159 | 61.15 | [55.76; 66.82] |
| M′nong | 204 | 78.46 | [73.96; 82.37] |
| Cadong | 56 | 21.54 | [17.63; 26.04] |
| 3–9 | 112 | 43.08 | [37.45; 48.89] |
| 10–19 | 71 | 27.31 | [21.84; 33.55] |
| 20–29 | 44 | 16.92 | [12.75; 22.11] |
| 30–60 | 33 | 12.69 | [9.35; 17.00] |
| No (children <6 years old) | 70 | 26.92 | [22.02; 32.47] |
| Farmer | 85 | 32.69 | [27.51; 38.34] |
| Pupil | 105 | 40.38 | [34.34; 46.74] |
| No | 184 | 70.77 | [61.81; 78.37] |
| At least one | 76 | 29.23 | [21.63; 38.19] |
| Lowest income | 147 | 56.54 | [47.20; 65.43] |
| Low | 26 | 10.00 | [5.70; 16.96] |
| Higher | 87 | 33.46 | [25.18; 42.90] |
| 2009 | 126 | 48.46 | [41.80; 55.18] |
| 2010 | 134 | 51.54 | [44.82; 58.20] |
| ≤1,000 | 56 | 21.54 | [16.90; 27.03] |
| 1,001–5,000 | 104 | 40 | [33.61; 46.75] |
| >5,001 | 100 | 38.46 | [31.86; 45.52] |
| Asexual parasites/μl (geometric mean) | 2,754.07 | [2,271.87; 3,338.61] | |
| 224 | 86.15 | [81.37; 89.86] | |
| Fever (axillary temperature ≥37.5 °C) | 154 | 59.23 | [53.06; 65.12] |
| Headache | 94 | 36.15 | [30.42; 42.32] |
| Fatigue | 86 | 33.08 | [27.23; 39.50] |
| Dizziness | 28 | 10.77 | [7.51; 15.22] |
| Enlarged spleen | 16 | 6.15 | [3.58; 10.39] |
| No symptoms | 66 | 25.38 | [20.36; 31.16] |
The score into tertiles was defined as “high,” “medium,” and “low” economic status.
Characteristic of P. vivax recurrences (all PCR-detected, patent, and symptomatic) detected between May 2009 and December 2011.
| All PCR-detected | Patent | Symptomatic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | ||||
| Patients free of recurrence | 52 | 23.32 | 99 | 44.39 | 139 | 62.33 |
| 1 recurrence only | 36 | 21.05 | 43 | 34.68 | 53 | 63.10 |
| 2 recurrences | 22 | 12.87 | 25 | 20.16 | 19 | 22.62 |
| 3 recurrences | 20 | 11.70 | 18 | 14.52 | 6 | 7.14 |
| 4+ recurrences | 93 | 54.38 | 38 | 30.64 | 6 | 7.14 |
| Number of recurrences/individual (Median [IQR]; max) | 4 [2–6]; 13 | 2 [1–4]; 10 | 1 [1–2]; 7 | |||
| Median time from enrollment to first recurrence (days), [IQR] | 118 [59–208] | 141 [86–237] | 181 [97–316] | |||
| By day 28 | 5 | 2.93 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 29–180 days | 113 | 66.08 | 80 | 64.52 | 42 | 50.00 |
| >180 days | 53 | 30.99 | 44 | 35.48 | 42 | 50.00 |
Abbreviations: IQR, Interquartile Range; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Univariable risk factor analysis for first recurrence using Cox PH model and for all recurrences using Cox CGT model (n = 223).
| Risk factor | Univariate of first recurrence | Univariate of all recurrences | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | HR | 95% CI | IR | HR | 95% CI | ||||||
| 171/148.64 | 1.15 | [0.99; 1.34] | 748/378.38 | 1.98 | [1.84; 2.12] | ||||||
| Village 1 | 68/76.40 | 0.89 | 1 | 288/161.07 | 1.79 | 1 | |||||
| Village 2 | 40/34.48 | 1.16 | 1.18 | 0.479 | [0.74; 1.87] | 144/82.54 | 1.74 | 0.97 | 0.811 | [0.79; 1.20] | |
| Village 3 | 22/24.33 | 0.9 | 0.91 | 0.705 | [0.56; 1.48] | 74/53.33 | 1.39 | 0.83 | 0.205 | [0.61; 1.11] | |
| Village 4 | 41/13.43 | 3.05 | 3.02 | <0.001 | [2.09; 4.36] | 242/81.43 | 2.97 | 1.27 | 0.007 | [1.07; 1.51] | |
| M’nong | 130/135.21 | 0.96 | 1 | 506/296.95 | 1.70 | 1 | |||||
| Cadong | 41/13.43 | 3.05 | 2.92 | <0.001 | [2.06; 4.14] | 242/81.43 | 2.97 | 1.32 | <0.001 | [1.13; 1.53] | |
| No | 154/147.09 | 1.05 | 1 | 645/369.41 | 1.75 | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 17/1.55 | 10.94 | 6.82 | <0.001 | [5.13; 9.06] | 103/8.96 | 11.49 | 4.90 | <0.001 | [4.19; 5.73] | |
| 2009 | 99/63.39 | 1.56 | 1 | 526/212.85 | 2.47 | 1 | |||||
| 2010 | 72/85.25 | 0.84 | 0.57 | 0.001 | [0.42; 0.79] | 222/165.53 | 1.34 | 0.69 | <0.001 | [0.57; 0.82] | |
| No | 130/95.02 | 1.37 | 1 | 579/272.22 | 2.13 | 1 | |||||
| At least one | 41/53.62 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.011 | [0.39; 0.88] | 169/106.16 | 1.59 | 0.86 | 0.119 | [0.72; 1.04] | |
| No | 653/368.66 | 1.77 | 1 | ||||||||
| Yes | 95/9.72 | 9.78 | 5.08 | <0.001 | [4.32; 5.96] | ||||||
| <1,000 | 37/31.42 | 1.18 | 1 | 204/86.50 | 2.36 | 1 | |||||
| 1,000–5,000 | 62/55.71 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 0.721 | [0.62; 1.40] | 252/138.44 | 1.82 | 0.83 | 0.043 | [0.69; 0.99] | |
| >5,000 | 72/61.52 | 1.17 | 0.97 | 0.887 | [0.66; 1.43] | 292/153.44 | 1.90 | 0.85 | 0.070 | [0.71; 1.01] | |
| Very low income | 99/83.90 | 1.18 | 1 | 385/216.37 | 1.78 | 1 | |||||
| Low | 16/15.00 | 1.07 | 0.90 | 0.72 | [0.49; 1.64] | 66/35.14 | 1.88 | 1.01 | 0.926 | [0.80; 1.27] | |
| Higher | 56/49.75 | 1.13 | 0.95 | 0.762 | [0.66; 1.36] | 297/126.87 | 2.34 | 1.21 | 0.015 | [1.04; 1.40] | |
| 124/213.09 | 0.58 | [0.49; 0.69] | 337/378.38 | 0.89 | [0.80; 0.99] | ||||||
| Village 1 | 52/96.47 | 0.54 | 1 | 124/161.07 | 0.77 | 1 | |||||
| Village 2 | 24/54.35 | 0.44 | 0.79 | 0.432 | [0.45; 1.41] | 53/82.54 | 0.64 | 0.82 | 0.310 | [0.56; 1.20] | |
| Village 3 | 11/37.85 | 0.29 | 0.57 | 0.068 | [0.31; 1.04] | 31/53.33 | 0.58 | 0.84 | 0.468 | [0.53; 1.34] | |
| Village 4 | 37/24.42 | 1.52 | 2.53 | <0.001 | [1.68; 3.81] | 129/81.43 | 1.58 | 1.59 | <0.001 | [1.23; 2.07] | |
| M’nong | 87/188.67 | 0.46 | 1 | 208/296.95 | 0.70 | 1 | |||||
| Cadong | 37/24.42 | 1.52 | 2.95 | <0.001 | [2.00; 4.35] | 129/81.43 | 1.58 | 1.72 | <0.001 | [1.36; 2.18] | |
| No | 107/210.42 | 0.51 | 1 | 280/369.41 | 0.76 | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 17/2.67 | 6.38 | 7.97 | <0.001 | [5.57; 11.40] | 57/8.96 | 6.36 | 5.16 | <0.001 | [3.93; 6.77] | |
| 2009 | 82/97.36 | 0.84 | 1 | 244/212.85 | 1.15 | 1 | |||||
| 2010 | 42/115.73 | 0.36 | 0.43 | <0.001 | [0.28; 0.65] | 93/165.53 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.003 | [0.42; 0.83] | |
| No | 96/142.67 | 0.67 | 1 | 271/272.22 | 1.00 | 1 | |||||
| At least one | 28/70.42 | 0.40 | 0.61 | 0.032 | [0.39; 0.96] | 66/106.16 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.038 | [0.53; 0.98] | |
| No | 290/368.66 | 0.79 | 1 | ||||||||
| Yes | 47/9.72 | 4.84 | 6.39 | <0.001 | [4.62; 8.83] | ||||||
| 84/227.14 | 0.31 | [0.25; 0.28] | 139/378.38 | 0.37 | [0.31; 0.43] | ||||||
| Village 1 | 37/118.33 | 0.31 | 1 | 51/161.07 | 0.32 | 1 | |||||
| Village 2 | 11/69.79 | 0.16 | 0.48 | 0.036 | [0.24; 0.95] | 14/82.54 | 0.17 | 0.53 | 0.039 | [0.29; 0.97] | |
| Village 3 | 10/40.72 | 0.25 | 0.78 | 0.475 | [0.40; 1.54] | 17/53.33 | 0.32 | 1.02 | 0.946 | [0.55; 1.88] | |
| Village 4 | 26/43.30 | 0.61 | 2.02 | 0.022 | [1.11; 3.69] | 57/81.43 | 0.70 | 2.09 | <0.001 | [1.38; 3.15] | |
| M’nong | 58/228.84 | 0.25 | 1 | 82/296.95 | 0.28 | 1 | |||||
| Cadong | 26/43.30 | 0.60 | 2.53 | 0.001 | [1.45; 4.41] | 57/81.43 | 0.70 | 2.36 | <0.001 | [1.62; 3.45] | |
| No | 70/268.07 | 0.26 | 1 | 114/369.41 | 0.31 | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 14/4.07 | 3.44 | 9.68 | <0.001 | [5.67; 16.53] | 25/8.96 | 2.79 | 5.89 | <0.001 | [3.73; 9.30] | |
| 2009 | 62/132.00 | 0.47 | 1 | 104/212.85 | 0.49 | 1 | |||||
| 2010 | 22/140.14 | 0.16 | 0.30 | <0.001 | [0.18; 0.49] | 35/165.53 | 0.21 | 0.42 | 0.001 | [0.25; 0.71] | |
| No | 63/191.87 | 0.33 | 1 | 113/272.22 | 0.42 | 1 | |||||
| At least one | 21/80.28 | 0.26 | 0.78 | 0.331 | [0.47; 1.30] | 26/106.16 | 0.24 | 0.63 | 0.017 | [0.44; 0.92] | |
| No | 115/368.66 | 0.31 | 1 | ||||||||
| Yes | 24/9.72 | 2.47 | 5.96 | <0.001 | [3.87; 9.18] | ||||||
| <1,000 | 18/60.06 | 0.30 | 1 | 40/86.50 | 0.46 | 1 | |||||
| 1,000–5,000 | 28/105.31 | 0.27 | 0.83 | 0.525 | [0.47; 1.48] | 35/138.44 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 0.023 | [0.38; 0.93] | |
| >5,000 | 38/106.77 | 0.36 | 1.09 | 0.762 | [0.63; 1.87] | 64/153.44 | 0.42 | 0.88 | 0.551 | [0.57; 1.35] | |
| 0 (children) | 34/89.10 | 0.38 | 1 | 64/134.14 | 0.48 | 1 | |||||
| 1–5 | 26/117.94 | 0.22 | 0.58 | 0.024 | [0.37; 0.93] | 38/151.47 | 0.25 | 0.58 | 0.020 | [0.37; 0.92] | |
| 6+ | 24/65.11 | 0.37 | 0.96 | 0.845 | [0.62; 1.49] | 37/92.78 | 0.40 | 0.86 | 0.468 | [0.57; 1.29] | |
n/per year: number of cases per person-years. The following variables were systematically analyzed in both first- and all-recurrences models: village, sex, ethnic groups, age, age groups, occupation, years of education, bed net in house, economic levels, year of entry, season of entry, parasites density at day 0, prior P. falciparum infection before P. vivax recurrence, and prior ACT/CQ treatment before P. vivax recurrence. Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin-based combination therapy; CGT, Conditional Gap Time; CQ, chloroquine; HR, Hazard Ratio; IR, Incidence Rate; PH, Proportional Hazard.
Fig 2A) Overall Kaplan–Meier probability of remaining free of P. vivax recurrences (either all PCR-identified, patent, or symptomatic recurrences) and remaining free of P. falciparum infection (by PCR) by month 24 of follow-up (n = 223); B) time intervals between consecutive P. vivax recurrences identified by PCR (n = 223 patients).
Wilcoxon sign rank P-values were computed. *Second time interval was compared to first among patients with at least two recurrences; **third time interval was compared to first among patients with at least three recurrences; ***fourth interval compared to first among patients with at least four recurrences. LM, light microscopy; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; S, survival probability.
Fig 3Heatmap of P. vivax recurrences by month of follow-up among the 171 cohort patients with at least one recurrence.
ID, identifier; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Multivariable-adjusted risk factor analysis using Cox PH model for first recurrence and Cox CGT for all recurrences.
| First recurrence | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||||
| Effect of ethnicity = nonsignificant | |||||||
| No | 2.21 | 0.002 | [1.33; 3.67] | No | |||
| 0.07 | 0.059 | [0.003; 1.11] | |||||
| M’nong | 99.19 | 0.001 | [6.16; 1,597.55] | 1 | |||
| Cadong | 2.98 | 0.002 | [1.48; 5.99] | 5.33 | 0.012 | [1.45; 19.62] | |
| No | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Yes | 6.51 | <0.001 | [3.66; 11.56] | 5.92 | 0.018 | [1.36; 25.75] | |
| No | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 7.83 | <0.001 | [4.25; 14.44] | ||||
| No | 6.35 | <0.001 | [4.32; 9.33] | 8.94 | <0.001 | [5.07; 15.77] | |
| 0.72 | 0.118 | [0.47; 1.09] | 1.53 | 0.482 | [0.47; 5.02] | ||
| No malaria treatment | 5.89 | <0.001 | [4.34; 7.98] | 5.06 | <0.001 | [2.57; 9.96] | |
| Malaria treatment | 0.66 | 0.09 | [0.41; 1.07] | 0.87 | 0.800 | [0.29; 2.63] | |
| No | 21.40 | <0.001 | [10.61; 43.18] | ||||
| 0.77 | 0.365 | [0.44; 1.35] | |||||
| No malaria treatment | 6.34 | <0.001 | [4.21; 9.54] | ||||
| Malaria treatment | 0.23 | <0.001 | [0.10; 0.50] | ||||
| No | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 1.80 | 0.07 | [0.96; 3.37] | ||||
| No | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 13.83 | <0.001 | [3.85; 49.72] | ||||
| No | 6.22 | <0.001 | [2.80; 13.82] | ||||
| 1.07 | 0.88 | [0.45; 2.54] | |||||
| No malaria treatment | 5.65 | <0.001 | [2.81; 11.35] | ||||
| Malaria treatment | 0.97 | 0.95 | [0.38; 2.46] | ||||
| No | 1 | ||||||
| Yes | 6.05 | 0.001 | [2.17; 16.86] | ||||
Among patients recruited in 2009, a significant interaction term (HR = 0.03; P = 0.016) for the hazard of first PCR-detected recurrence was found between ethnicity and prior P. falciparum infection. Similarly, significant interaction terms were found for the hazard of all PCR-detected recurrences (HR = 0.11, P < 0.001); patent recurrences (HR = 0.035, P < 0.001) and symptomatic recurrences (HR = 0.17, P = 0.03). For patients recruited in 2010, a significant interaction term (HR = 0.17; P = 0.008) for the hazard of all PCR-detected recurrences was found between prior P. falciparum infection and prior antimalaria treatment. Abbreviations: ACT, artemisinin-based combination therapy; CGT, Conditional Gap Time; CQ, chloroquine; HR, Hazard Ratio; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PH, Proportional Hazard.
Fig 4A) Monthly climatic data in the study area; B) monthly evolution of the cohort size with proportion of patients identified with P. vivax recurrence (all PCR-identified, all patent, and all symptomatic) and the monthly incidence risk of P. falciparum infections detected by ACD and PCD (LM) in study population.
ACD, active case detection; LM, light microscopy; PCD, passive case detection.