| Literature DB >> 25880664 |
Pham Vinh Thanh1, Nguyen Van Hong2, Nguyen Van Van3, Carine Van Malderen4, Valérie Obsomer5, Anna Rosanas-Urgell6, Koen Peeters Grietens7, Nguyen Xuan Xa8, Germana Bancone9, Nongnud Chowwiwat10, Tran Thanh Duong11, Umberto D'Alessandro12,13, Niko Speybroeck14, Annette Erhart15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: After successfully reducing the malaria burden to pre-elimination levels over the past two decades, the national malaria programme in Vietnam has recently switched from control to elimination. However, in forested areas of Central Vietnam malaria elimination is likely to be jeopardized by the high occurrence of asymptomatic and submicroscopic infections as shown by previous reports. This paper presents the results of a malaria survey carried out in a remote forested area of Central Vietnam where we evaluated malaria prevalence and risk factors for infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25880664 PMCID: PMC4342195 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0601-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Figure 1Map of the study area showing malaria prevalence in the 20 study clusters (by microscopy and PCR).
Baseline characteristics of the study population
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Village 1 | 407 | 22.5 |
| Village 2 | 305 | 16.8 |
| Village 3 | 751 | 41.5 |
| Village 4 | 347 | 19.2 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 929 | 51.3 |
| Female | 881 | 48.7 |
| Age groups | ||
| ≤9 | 568 | 31.4 |
| 10 -- 19 | 443 | 24.5 |
| 20 -- 29 | 321 | 17.7 |
| ≥30 | 478 | 26.4 |
| Median age; [range] | 16; [1; 88] | |
| Ethnic groups | ||
| Cadong | 350 | 19.3 |
| M’nong | 1,447 | 79.9 |
| Kinh and others | 13 | 0.7 |
| Education level (age >18 years, n = 834) | ||
| None | 230 | 27.6 |
| Elementary | 402 | 48.2 |
| Secondary and above | 202 | 24.2 |
| Occupation (age >18 years, n = 834) | ||
| Students | 27 | 3.2 |
| Farmers | 755 | 90.5 |
| Others (officer, business) | 52 | 6.2 |
|
|
|
|
| Average persons/household, median; [range] | 5; [1; 11] | |
| Bed net availability | ||
| No net | 270 | 76.7 |
| 1-2 persons/net | 21 | 6.0 |
| ≥3 persons/net | 61 | 17.3 |
| Type of roof | ||
| Aluminium | 330 | 93.7 |
| Others (leaves, tiles, wood, bamboo) | 22 | 6.3 |
| Type of wall | ||
| Wood | 310 | 88.1 |
| Bamboo | 41 | 11.6 |
| Brick | 1 | 0.3 |
| Cinnamon plantation | ||
| Owns cinnamon plantation | 332 | 94.3 |
| Average walking distance (hours) from village to plantation, median; [range] | 1 h. [3 min; 8 hr] | |
| Economic status | ||
| Lowest income | 219 | 62.2 |
| Low | 27 | 7.7 |
| Higher | 106 | 30.1 |
Malariometric indices by study village (determined by microscopy and PCR)
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Parasite prevalence (microscopy) | 4.9 (17) | 3.9 (10) | 9.8 (52) | 10.9 (34) | 7.8 (113/1450) | [6.3; 9.6] |
| Prevalence by age group (years): | ||||||
| ≤9 | 4.7 (6/127) | 1.2 (1/84) | 9.9 (20/202) | 15.4 (18/117) | 8.5 (45/530) | [6.3; 11.3] °° |
| 10–19 | 7.6 (5/66) | 7.6 (4/53) | 25.6 (20/78) | 11.4 (8/70) | 13.9 (37/267) | [9.4; 20.0] |
| 20–39 | 4.2 (4/95 | 5.3 (4/75) | 5.6 (9/160) | 7.9 (6/76) | 5.7 (23/406) | [3.8; 8.3] |
| ≥40 | 3.2 (2/62) | 2.3 (1/44) | 3.3 (3/92) | 4.1 (2/49) | 3.2 (8/247) | [1.6; 6.4] |
| Species distribution (proportion): | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [72.8; 87.8] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [11.6; 26.1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [0.1; 6.3] |
| Parasite density (geometric mean): | ||||||
| |
|
|
|
|
| [1,523.8; 2,643.1] |
| |
|
|
|
|
| [301.9; 1,037.7] |
| Infections with gametocytes, % (n) | 64.7 (11/17) | 40.0 (4/10) | 15.4 (8/52) | 52.9 (18/34) | 36.3 (41/113) | [28.0; 45.5]°° |
| Proportion asymptomatic, % (n) | 76.5 (13/17) | 80.0 (8/10) | 73.1 (38/52) | 58.8 (20/34) | 69.9 (79/113) | [60.1; 78.2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Parasite prevalence*, % (n) | 16.4 (13/75) | 18.9 (12/55) | 20.2 (25/133) | 42.5 (24/64) | 23.6 (74/327) | [19.0; 28.9] |
| Species distribution: | ||||||
|
| 25.8 (4) | 52.6 (6) | 77.5 (17) | 58.6 (14) | 59.2 (41) | [47.2; 70.2] |
|
| 74.2 (9) | 47.4 (6) | 22.5 (8) | 37.9 (9) | 39.6 (32) | [28.7; 51.6] |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.5 (1) | 1.2 (1) | [0.2; 8.7] |
| Prop. sub-patent infections, % (n) | 79.0 (10) | 73.7 (8) | 44.9 (14) | 57.2 (14) | 58.7 (46) | [46.2; 70.2] |
| Prop. asymptomatic infections, % (n) | 100.0 (13) | 71.9 (9) | 62.3 (15) | 78.6 (18) | 75.4 (55) | [63.7; 84.2] |
| Prevalence ratio LM/PCR | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.33 | |
| Mean haemoglobin, g/dl | 13.1 | 13.4 | 11.9 | 11.9 | 12.4 |
|
| Prevalence anaemia (Hb <10.0 g/dl) | 3.4 (2) | 2.7 (1) | 14.9 (19) | 11.7 (7) | 9.6 (29) | [6.6; 13.7] |
°Chi-square p < 0.05;
°°Chi-square p < 0.001 (p-values are specified for significant differences between villages for each category);
* Village prevalence was estimated taking into account the survey design (weight = household size; strata = village);
** Significant Hb decrease by >1.1 g/dl in Villages 3 and 4 compared to Village 1 (svy regress p < 0.05).
Figure 2A Ratio sub-patent/patent malaria infections according to malaria prevalence by village; B Ratio sub-patent/patent malaria infections according species prevalence by village and ratio Pv/Pf; C Ratio sub-patent infections according to prevalence by age group; D Ratio sub-/patent according to species prevalence by age group and ratio Pv/Pf.
Multivariate adjusted risk factor analysis for malaria infections detected by PCR, using survey logistic regression
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 74/327 | 22.6 | [18.3; 27.6] | _ | |||
| Village | |||||||
| Village 1 | 13/75 | 16.4 | [9.4; 27.0] | 1 | 1 | ||
| Village 2 | 12/55 | 18.9 | [10.2; 32.0] | 1.18 | [0.45; 3.11] | 1.46 | [0.54; 3.92] |
| Village 3 | 25/133 | 20.2 | [13.7; 29.0] | 1.29 | [0.58; 2.85] | 1.49 | [0.66; 3.35] |
| Village 4 | 24/64 | 42.5 | [30.3; 56.0] | 3.77* | [1.64; 8.66] | 3.49* | [1.51; 8.03] |
| Ethnic | |||||||
| Cadong | 24/64 | 42.5 | [30.3; 56.0] | 1 | |||
| M’nong | 50/263 | 18.9 | [14.3; 25.0] | 0.31* | [0.17; 0.59] | _ | |
| Age groups, years | |||||||
| ≤9 | 26/82 | 32.3 | [22.9; 43.0] | 1 | |||
| 10-19 | 18/63 | 30.7 | [20.0; 44.0] | 0.93 | [0.44; 1.96] | ||
| 20 + | 30/182 | 15.4 | [10.6; 22.0] | 0.38* | [0.20; 0.72] | _ | |
| Occupation | |||||||
| None (children, disabled) | 15/51 | 30.1 | [18.9; 44.0] | 1 | |||
| Farmers | 33/192 | 16.5 | [11.6; 23.0] | 0.46* | [0.22; 0.96] | ||
| Others (officer, business, students) | 26/84 | 32.8 | [23.2; 44.0] | 1.13 | [0.52; 2.48] | _ | |
| Bed net availability in household | |||||||
| No net | 63/254 | 26.7 | [21.3; 33.0] | 1 | 1 | ||
| At least one net | 11/73 | 12.7 | [6.8; 22.0] | 0.40* | [0.19; 0.84] | 0.44* | [0.20; 0.97] |
| Wall of house | |||||||
| Bamboo wall | 3/37 | 6.1 | [1.7; 19.0] | 1 | 1 | ||
| Wood wall | 71/290 | 25.7 | [20.7; 31.0] | 5.30* | [1.40; 20.06] | 5.71* | [1.47; 22.1] |
CI: Confident interval; OR: Odd ratio; AOR: Adjusted odd ratio; *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Categorical tree showing the main risk factors for all malaria infections detected by PCR (n = 327).
Figure 4Categorical tree showing the main risk factors for patent malaria infections (detected by microscopy and PCR).