Literature DB >> 31099977

Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions.

Christopher Krupenye1, Josep Call1.   

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM; a.k.a., mind-reading, mentalizing, mental-state attribution, and perspective-taking) is the ability to ascribe mental states, such as desires and beliefs, to others, and it is central to the unique forms of communication, cooperation, and culture that define our species. As a result, for 40 years, researchers have endeavored to determine whether ToM is itself unique to humans. Investigations in other species (e.g., apes, monkeys, corvids) are essential to understand the mechanistic underpinnings and evolutionary origins of this capacity across taxa, including humans. We review the literature on ToM in nonhuman animals, suggesting that some species share foundational social cognitive mechanisms with humans. We focus principally on innovations of the last decade and pressing directions for future work. Underexplored types of social cognition have been targeted, including ascription of mental states, such as desires and beliefs, that require simultaneously representing one's own and another's conflicting motives or views of the world. Ongoing efforts probe the motivational facets of ToM, how flexibly animals can recruit social cognitive skills across cooperative and competitive settings, and appropriate motivational contexts for comparative inquiry. Finally, novel methodological and empirical approaches have brought new species (e.g., lemurs, dogs) into the lab, implemented critical controls to elucidate underlying mechanisms, and contributed powerful new techniques (e.g., looking-time, eye-tracking) that open the door to unexplored approaches for studying animal minds. These innovations in cognition, motivation, and method promise fruitful progress in the years to come, in understanding the nature and origin of ToM in humans and other species. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Evolutionary Roots of Cognition Psychology > Comparative Psychology Neuroscience > Cognition.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal cognition; comparative psychology; evolutionary psychology; mental state attribution; perspective taking; social cognition; theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31099977     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  19 in total

1.  Great apes use self-experience to anticipate an agent's action in a false-belief test.

Authors:  Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Satoshi Hirata; Masaki Tomonaga; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chimpanzees consider freedom of choice in their evaluation of social action.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Esther Herrmann; Marina Proft; Stefanie Keupp; Yarrow Dunham; Hannes Rakoczy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Coordinating social action: a primer for the cross-species investigation of communicative repair.

Authors:  Raphaela Heesen; Marlen Fröhlich; Christine Sievers; Marieke Woensdregt; Mark Dingemanse
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Following the human point: Research with nonhuman animals since Povinelli, Nelson, and Boysen (1990).

Authors:  Maeve K McCreary; Sara V R Jones; Valerie A Kuhlmeier
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 1.926

5.  The application of noninvasive, restraint-free eye-tracking methods for use with nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lydia M Hopper; Roberto A Gulli; Lauren H Howard; Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Amy M Ryan; Annika Paukner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06

Review 6.  Dimensions of Animal Consciousness.

Authors:  Jonathan Birch; Alexandra K Schnell; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Little evidence that Eurasian jays protect their caches by responding to cues about a conspecific's desire and visual perspective.

Authors:  Piero Amodio; Benjamin G Farrar; Christopher Krupenye; Ljerka Ostojić; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  How do non-human primates represent others' awareness of where objects are hidden?

Authors:  Daniel J Horschler; Laurie R Santos; Evan L MacLean
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-03-24

9.  Dogs follow human misleading suggestions more often when the informant has a false belief.

Authors:  Lucrezia Lonardo; Christoph J Völter; Claus Lamm; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 10.  Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation.

Authors:  Pamela Barone; Antoni Gomila
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.