Literature DB >> 33773422

How do non-human primates represent others' awareness of where objects are hidden?

Daniel J Horschler1, Laurie R Santos2, Evan L MacLean3.   

Abstract

Although non-human primates (NHPs) generally appear to predict how knowledgeable agents use knowledge to guide their behavior, the cognitive mechanisms that enable this remain poorly understood. We assessed the conditions under which NHPs' representations of an agent's awareness break down. Free-ranging rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) watched as an agent observed a target object being hidden in one of two boxes. While the agent could no longer see the boxes, the box containing the object flipped open and the object either changed in size/shape (Experiment 1) or color (Experiment 2). Monkeys looked longer when the agent searched for the object incorrectly rather than correctly following the color change (a non-geometric manipulation), but not the size/shape change (a geometric manipulation). Even though the agent maintained knowledge of the object's location in both cases, monkeys no longer expected the agent to search correctly after it had been geometrically (but not non-geometrically) manipulated. Experiment 3 confirmed that monkeys were sensitive to the color manipulation used in Experiment 2, making it unlikely that a failure to perceive the color manipulation accounted for our findings. Our results show that NHPs do not always expect that knowledgeable agents will act on their knowledge to obtain their goals, consistent with heuristic-based accounts of how NHPs represent others' mental states. These findings also suggest that geometric changes that occur outside the agent's perceptual access may disrupt attribution of awareness more so than non-geometric changes.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative cognition; Knowledge representation; Non-human primates; Social cognition; Theory of mind; Violation of expectation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33773422      PMCID: PMC8154671          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  49 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.

Authors:  H M Wellman; D Cross; J Watson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

Review 2.  Do Non-Human Primates Really Represent Others' Beliefs?

Authors:  Daniel J Horschler; Evan L MacLean; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  How capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) quantify objects and substances.

Authors:  Kristy VanMarle; Justine Aw; Koleen McCrink; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Great apes use self-experience to anticipate an agent's action in a false-belief test.

Authors:  Fumihiro Kano; Christopher Krupenye; Satoshi Hirata; Masaki Tomonaga; Josep Call
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chimpanzees strategically manipulate what others can see.

Authors:  Katja Karg; Martin Schmelz; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  What do monkeys know about others' knowledge?

Authors:  Lindsey A Drayton; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-10-15

7.  Infants' reasoning about others' false perceptions.

Authors:  Hyun-joo Song; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-11

8.  Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe.

Authors:  Juliane Kaminski; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-11

9.  Spontaneous representations of small numbers of objects by rhesus macaques: examinations of content and format.

Authors:  Marc D Hauser; Susan Carey
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.