| Literature DB >> 31096914 |
Jinbin Li1, Qun Wang2, Chengyun Li3, Yunqing Bi2, Xue Fu2, Raoquan Wang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice blast disease is one of the most destructive fungal disease of rice worldwide. The avirulence (AVR) genes of Magnaporthe oryzae are recognized by the cognate resistance (R) genes of rice and trigger race-specific resistance. The variation in AVR is one of the major drivers of new races. Detecting the variation in the AVR gene in isolates from a population of Magnaporthe oryzae collected from rice production fields will aid in evaluating the effectiveness of R genes in rice production areas. The Pik gene contains 5 R alleles (Pik, Pikh, Pikp, Pikm and Piks) corresponding to the AVR alleles (AVR-Pik/kh/kp/km/ks) of M. oryzae. The Pik gene specifically recognizes and prevents infections by isolates of M. oryzae that contain AVR-Pik. The molecular variation in AVR-Pik alleles of M. oryzae and Pik alleles of rice remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: AVR-Pik; Effector; Evolution; Magnaporthe oryzae
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31096914 PMCID: PMC6524238 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-1817-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Distribution of AVR-Pik genes and avirulent isolates of M. oryzae collected from Yunnan, China, in IRBLk-K, IRBLkm-Ts, IRBLkp-K60, and IRBLkh-K3
| Locations | No. of isolates | PCR detection | Pathogenicity assaya | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of isolates with | Frequency (%) | No. of avirulent isolates and frequency (%) | ||||||
| IRBLk-K | IRBLkm-Ts | IRBLkp-K60 | IRBLkh-K3 | IRBLks-F5 | ||||
| Central | 54 | 42 | 77.8 | 40 (74.1) | 39 (72.2) | 36 (66.7) | 43 (79.6) | 15 (27.8) |
| Northeastern | 72 | 65 | 90.3 | 62 (86.1) | 64 (88.9) | 52 (72.2) | 68 (94.4) | 15 (20.8) |
| Northwestern | 15 | 10 | 66.7 | 2 (13.3) | 4 (26.7) | 2 (13.3) | 5 (33.3) | 1 (6.7) |
| Southeastern | 33 | 24 | 72.7 | 24 (72.7) | 26 (78.8) | 19 (57.6) | 27 (81.8) | 2 (6.1) |
| Southwestern | 28 | 25 | 89.3 | 16 (57.1) | 20 (71.4) | 15 (53.6) | 22 (78.6) | 6 (21.4) |
| Western | 164 | 112 | 68.3 | 79 (48.2) | 103 (62.8) | 30 (18.3) | 111 (67.7) | 44 (26.8) |
| Total | 366 | 278 | 76.0 | 223 (60.9) | 256 (69.9) | 154 (42.1) | 276 (75.4) | 83 (22.7) |
|
| 149 | 111 | 74.5 | 109 (73.2) | 123 (82.6) | 73 (49.0) | 130 (87.2) | 40 (26.8) |
|
| 217 | 167 | 77.0 | 114 (52.5) | 133 (61.3) | 81 (37.3) | 146 (67.3) | 43 (19.8) |
| Total | 366 | 278 | 76.0 | 223 (60.9) | 256 (69.9) | 154 (42.1) | 276 (75.4) | 83 (22.7) |
aIndicates the pathogenicity assay of the monogenic lines IRBLk-K, IRBLkm-Ts, IRBLkp-K60, IRBLkh-K3 and IRBLks-F5 containing Pik, Pikm, Pikp, Pikh and Piks, respectively. XI and GJ indicate Xian/Indica and Geng/Japonica, respectively
Haplotypes of AVR-Pik loci in rice blast fungus in Yunnan, China
| Haplotype | No. of isolates | % of total | Variant locusa | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 136 | 139 | 143 | 200 | 233 | 234 | |||
| AB498875 ( | C | C | G | C | T | G | ||
| AB498876 ( | A | G | A | . | . | . | ||
| AB498877( | A | G | A | . | . | A | ||
| AB498878 ( | A | . | . | A | . | . | ||
| AB498879 ( | A | . | . | . | . | . | ||
| H01 | 45 | 22.4 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| H02 | 46 | 22.9 | A | G | A | . | . | . |
| H03 | 4 | 2 | A | G | A | . | . | A |
| H04 | 11 | 5.5 | A | . | . | A | . | . |
| H05 | 51 | 25.4 | A | . | . | . | . | . |
| H06 | 4 | 2 | A | . | A | . | . | . |
| H07 | 27 | 13.4 | . | . | A | . | . | . |
| H08 | 4 | 2 | A | . | A | A | . | . |
| H09 | 3 | 1.5 | . | G | A | . | . | . |
| H10 | 6 | 3 | A | G | A | . | A | . |
aIndicates the same as AB498875 (GenBank Accession No.). AB498875, AB498876, AB498877, AB498878 and AB498879 of AVR-Pik were obtained from GenBank and represent the five different alleles AVR-Pik_D, AVR-Pik_A, AVR-Pik_B, AVR-Pik_C, and AVR-Pik_E, respectively
Variation in the AVR-Pik loci proteins in rice blast fungus in Yunnan, China
| Haplotype | Total isolates | Variant locusa | Disease reactionb | Functional allelec | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46 | 47 | 48 | 67 | 78 | IRBLk-K | IRBLkm-Ts | IRBLkp-K60 | IRBLkh-K3 | IRBLks-F5 | |||
| AB498875 | H | P | G | A | M |
| ||||||
| AB498876 | N | A | D |
|
| -d | ||||||
| AB498877 | N | A | D |
| I | -d | ||||||
| AB498878 | N |
|
| D |
| -d | ||||||
| AB498879 | N |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| H01 | 45 |
|
|
|
|
| 37R + 8 M | 39R + 6 M | 26R + 19 M | 41R + 4 M | 34S + 11 M |
|
| H02 | 46 | N | A | D |
|
| 35S + 11 M | 27S + 19 M | 38S + 8 M | 44R + 2 M | 45S + 1 M |
|
| H03 | 4 | N | A | D |
| I | 4S | 4S | 4S | 3R + 1 M | 3S + 1 M |
|
| H04 | 11 | N |
|
| D |
| 8S + 3 M | 5S + 6 M | 8S + 3 M | 5S + 6 M | 8S + 3 M |
|
| H05 | 51 | N |
|
|
|
| 28R + 23 M | 49R + 2 M | 49S + 2 M | 49R + 2 M | 26S + 25 M |
|
| H06 | 4 | N |
| D |
|
| 3S + 1 M | 3R + 1 M | 4S | 3R + 1 M | 4S |
|
| H07 | 27 |
|
| D |
|
| 25R + 2 M | 25R + 2 M | 25R + 2 M | 24R + 3 M | 20S + 7 M |
|
| H08 | 4 | N |
| D | D |
| 4R | 4R | 3S + 1 M | 4R | 4S |
|
| H09 | 3 |
| A | D |
|
| 3R | 3R | 2R + 1 M | 3R | 1R + 2S |
|
| H10 | 6 | N | A | D |
| K | 6S | 5S + 1 M | 5S + 1 M | 6S | 6S | – |
aIndicates the same as AB498875
bIndicates the pathogenicity assay of the monogenic lines IRBLk-K, IRBLkm-Ts, IRBLkp-K60, IRBLkh-K3, and IRBLks-F5 containing the resistance genes Pik, Pikm, Pikp, Pikh, and Piks, respectively. R, M and S indicate that the disease reaction was resistant, moderately resistant and susceptible, respectively. (Ex.45R indicates that 45 isolates were avirulent to the corresponding monogenic line)
cIndicates a lack of avirulent functional alleles to the corresponding R genes
dThe functional alleles from the references of Yoshida et al. [7]: AB498875, AB498876, AB498877, AB498878 and AB498879 are AVR-Pik-D, AVR-Pik-A, AVR-Pik-B, AVR-Pik-C, and AVR-Pik-E, respectively
Distribution of AVR-Pik haplotypes in different rice-growing regions
| Haplotype | No. isolates | Percent (%) | Regions | Production | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeastern | Central | Southeastern | Western | Northwestern | Southwestern |
|
| |||
| H01 | 45 | 21.8 | 12 (30.8)a | 14 (37.8) | 10 (58.8) | 9 (10.2) | 0 | 0 | 19 (30.6) | 26 (18.7) |
| H02 | 46 | 22.3 | 4 (10.3) | 2 (5.4) | 1 (5.9) | 29 (33.0) | 10 (100) | 0 | 2 (3.2) | 44 (31.7) |
| H03 | 4 | 1.9 | 2 (5.1) | 2 (5.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (2.9) |
| H04 | 11 | 5.3 | 1 (2.6) | 0 | 2 (11.8) | 2 (2.3) | 0 | 6 (60.0) | 9 (14.5) | 2 (1.4) |
| H05 | 51 | 24.8 | 9 (23.1) | 0 | 0 | 42 (47.7) | 0 | 0 | 22 (35.5) | 29 (20.9) |
| H06 | 4 | 1.9 | 0 | 1 (2.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (30.0) | 3 (4.8) | 1 (0.7) |
| H07 | 27 | 13.1 | 9 (23.1) | 15 (40.5) | 1 (5.9) | 2 (2.3) | 0 | 0 | 3 (4.8) | 24 (17.3) |
| H08 | 4 | 1.9 | 2 (5.1) | 1 (2.7) | 1 (5.9) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.6) | 3 (2.2) |
| H09 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 2 (5.4) | 0 | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (2.2) |
| H10 | 6 | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | 2 (11.8) | 3 (3.4) | 0 | 1 (10.0) | 3 (4.8) | 3 (2.2) |
| Total | 201 | 100 | 39 | 37 | 17 | 88 | 10 | 10 | 62 | 139 |
| No. of haplotypes | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 10 | ||
| Index of diversityb | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.75 | 0.79 | ||
aNumber and frequency (in brackets) of isolates of each haplotype
bThe diversity index was calculated as the frequency of haplotypes in the M. oryzae population following Fontaine’s method [38]: diversity index = (1-∑ni = 1pi2) (where pi is the frequency of haplotype i in a population)
Fig. 1The haplotype network for the 10 AVR-Pik alleles. The original AVR-Pik allele is designated as the H01 haplotype in the network. Haplotypes are separated by mutational events. All haplotypes are displayed as circles. The size of the circles corresponds to the haplotype frequency. Haplotypes H01 to H05 are the same as AB498875, AB498876, AB498877, AB498878 and AB498879 (GenBank Accession No.) of AVR-Pik and were obtained from GenBank. Green indicates avirulence to the corresponding R gene, and yellow indicates virulence to the corresponding R gene
Fig. 2Possible scenario for M. oryzae AVR-Pik allele-rice Pik allele interactions and coevolution. Chronological order is given on the left (time order). The AVR-Pik homolog H01 (AVR-Pik-D) was derived from an ancestral M. oryzae gene. AVR-Pik-D (H01), H07 and H09 are recognized by Pikp; thus, the altered alleles AVR-Pik-E (H05) and H08 evolved. In response to this situation, another Pik allele, Pik, evolved that can recognize five alleles, namely, AVR-Pik-D (H01), H07, H09, AVR-Pik-E (H05) and H08. Then, yet another AVR-Pik allele, H06, was derived that cannot be recognized by Pikp and Pik. Next, the rice R gene Pikm was utilized that recognizes AVR-Pik-D (H01), H07, H09, AVR-Pik-E (H05), H08 and H06. Then, two more AVR-Pik alleles, namely, AVR-Pik-A (H02) and AVR-Pik-B (H03), were derived that cannot be recognized by Pikp, Pik and Pikm. Next, the rice R gene Pikh was utilized that recognizes AVR-Pik-D (H01), H07, H09, AVR-Pik-E (H05), H08, H06, AVR-Pik-A (H02) and AVR-Pik-B (H03). Then, two other AVR-Pik alleles, namely, AVR-Pik-C (H04) and H10, evolved that cannot be recognized by any of the five Pik alleles
Fig. 3Sliding window of positively selected sites in the AVR-Pik alleles under the M8, M8a, and M7 models. The Y-axis indicates the ratio of the rate of nonsynonymous substitutions (Ka) to the rate of synonymous substitutions (Ks) (Ka/Ks); the X-axis indicates the position of the AVR-Pik amino acids in the site. The signal region of the variant structure is purple, and the black area represents the mature protein region on the label at the top of the figure