Literature DB >> 3109575

Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy.

K Augensen, P Bergsjø, T Eikeland, K Askvik, J Carlsen.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomised study of mothers referred for prolonged pregnancy (around the 42nd week) 214 (group 1) were submitted to attempted induction of labour and 195 (group 2) assigned to continue for a further week without intervention. Strict selection criteria were used for the certainty of term. Mothers in group 2 were given regular non-stress tests to ensure fetal wellbeing, as were those in group 1 in whom induction failed. In group 1, 48 (23%) out of 210 first attempted inductions failed. In group 2, 135 (69%) of the births started spontaneously as compared with 38 (18%) in group 1. The mean duration of labour was 7.5 hours in each group. There was no significant difference in incidence of operative delivery, use of analgesics, or signs of perinatal asphyxia. Significantly more children in group 1 needed phototherapy for hyperbilirubinaemia. There was a clustering of births in the late afternoon and evening, which was most pronounced in group 1. A policy of vigilant non-intervention up to the 44th completed week of pregnancy does not appear to jeopardize mother or fetus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3109575      PMCID: PMC1246355          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6581.1192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  12 in total

1.  Use of oxytocin and incidence of neonatal jaundice.

Authors:  I Chalmers; H Campbell; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-04-19

2.  Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate.

Authors:  L Cardozo; J Fysh; J M Pearce
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-25

3.  Nasal and buccal oxytocin for the induction of labour: a clinical trial.

Authors:  P Bergsjö; H Jenssen
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1969-02

4.  Prolonged pregnancy: surveillance of the fetus and the neonate and the course of labor and delivery.

Authors:  J Shime; D J Gare; J Andrews; M Bertrand; J Salgado; G Whillans
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe.

Authors:  P Bergsjø; E Schmidt; D Pusch
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-07

6.  [Comparison of 2 obstetrical attitudes vis-à-vis inducing labor at term. Randomized study].

Authors:  G Bréart; J Goujard; F Maillard; C Chavigny; C Rumeau-Rouquette; C Sureau
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  1982

7.  Factors influencing the incidence of neonatal jaundice.

Authors:  L Friedman; P J Lewis; P Clifton; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-05-13

8.  A randomized controlled trial of selective planned delivery.

Authors:  D H Martin; W Thompson; J H Pinkerton; J D Watson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1978-02

9.  Case-control analysis of post-term induction of labor.

Authors:  P Bergsjø; L S Bakketeig; S N Eikhom
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  R A Cole; P W Howie; M C Macnaughton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

Review 2.  Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour.

Authors:  G R Howarth; D J Botha
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 4.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Mishanina; Ewelina Rogozinska; Tej Thatthi; Rehan Uddin-Khan; Khalid S Khan; Catherine Meads
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

6.  Acupuncture for the induction of labour: a double-blind randomised controlled study.

Authors:  J Modlock; B B Nielsen; N Uldbjerg
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arwa Abbas Hussain; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Aamer Imdad; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Postterm pregnancy.

Authors:  M Galal; I Symonds; H Murray; F Petraglia; R Smith
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

9.  The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study.

Authors:  Elad Mei-Dan; Elizabeth V Asztalos; Andrew R Willan; Jon F R Barrett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.