Literature DB >> 3094775

Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate.

L Cardozo, J Fysh, J M Pearce.   

Abstract

A prospective trial was conducted to compare the effects of conservative management of prolonged pregnancy (conservative group) with routine induction of labour at 42 weeks' gestation (active group) in otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies. Of the 402 pregnancies studied, 207 (51%) were allocated to conservative management and 195 (49%) were allocated to have labour induced. The groups were well matched for age, parity, and smoking habits. One hundred and sixty six (80%) of the patients in the conservative group went into spontaneous labour. Of the remainder, two underwent elective caesarean section, 19 had labour induced because of clinical concern, and the remaining 20 had labour induced at the patient's own request. One hundred and twenty five (64%) of the patients in the planned active group underwent induction of labour. Of the remaining 70, 49 went into spontaneous labour and 21 (11%) asked that they should not have labour induced. Comparison of the two groups showed no difference in the length of the first stage of labour but a trend towards an increased need for intervention for fetal distress (p less than 0.06) in the active group. There were no differences in the length of the second stage, the need for intervention, or the mode of delivery. In terms of Apgar scores the neonatal outcome was not significantly different between the two groups, but a greater proportion of the babies (15% v 8%) in the active group required intubation. Umbilical cord venous pH estimated in the last 183 consecutive deliveries in the study showed a significantly lower mean value in the active group (p less than 0.05). There was no difference in birth weight between the two groups. Two deaths occurred in the study. There was a stillbirth in the conservative group at 292 days after massive abruption, and one neonatal death in the active group owing to multiple congenital abnormalities. The outcome for mother and baby in patients from both groups who went into spontaneous labour was generally good. The outcome for patients for whom conservative management was planned but induction became necessary was no different from that of patients who underwent planned induction at term. Thus from our results we can find no evidence to support the view that women with normal prolonged pregnancy should undergo routine induction of labour at 42 weeks' gestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3094775      PMCID: PMC1341914          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6554.1059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  20 in total

1.  The choice between death from postmaturity or prolapsed cord and life from induction of labour.

Authors:  G W THEOBALD
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1959-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Placental insufficiency in relation to postterm pregnancy and fetal postmaturity. Evaluation of fetoplacental function; management of the postterm gravida.

Authors:  H Vorherr
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Studies in prolonged pregnancy. I. The incidence of prolonged pregnancy.

Authors:  N A Beischer; J H Evans; L Townsend
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-02-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S H Eik-Nes; O Okland; J C Aure; M Ulstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prolonged pregnancy: is induction of labour indicated? A prospective study.

Authors:  D M Gibb; L D Cardozo; J W Studd; D J Cooper
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1982-04

6.  Outcome of spontaneous labour in multigravidae.

Authors:  D M Gibb; L D Cardozo; J W Studd; A L Magos; D J Cooper
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1982-09

7.  [The prolonged pregnancy and its effect on the fate of the child].

Authors:  J Holtorff; H Schmidt
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1966-04-09

8.  Intrapartum assessment of the postdate fetus.

Authors:  F C Miller; J A Read
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Intrapartum monitoring and management of the postdate fetus.

Authors:  S Y Yeh; S L Bruce; Y S Thornton
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.430

10.  The present place of routine ultrasound screening.

Authors:  S L Warsof; J M Pearce; S Campbell
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-12
View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.

Authors:  A K Sue-A-Quan; M E Hannah; M M Cohen; G A Foster; R M Liston
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The management of post-term pregnancy.

Authors:  S Iwanicki; A Akierman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Aging of the placenta.

Authors:  H Fox
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Randomised comparison of early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy.

Authors:  K Augensen; P Bergsjø; T Eikeland; K Askvik; J Carlsen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-09

5.  Induction of labour postdates in primiparae using vaginal prostaglandin tablets.

Authors:  M J Turner; R Fox; M Brassil; R Gleeson; H Gordon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Early versus late induction of labour in post-term pregnancy.

Authors:  C E Lennox; N B Patel
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-06-27

Review 7.  Clinical experimentation in obstetrics.

Authors:  R J Lilford
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-11-21

8.  Induction of labour at term. Evidence on outcome favours induction.

Authors:  R O'Connor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-22

9.  Is routine induction of labour at term ever justified?

Authors:  L Cardozo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-27

Review 10.  Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.

Authors:  Jane Thomas; Anna Fairclough; Josephine Kavanagh; Anthony J Kelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.