| Literature DB >> 31093273 |
Ylenia Nicolini1, Barbara Manini2, Elisa De Stefani1, Gino Coudé3, Daniela Cardone4, Anna Barbot5, Chiara Bertolini5, Cecilia Zannoni5, Mauro Belluardo1, Andrea Zangrandi6,7, Bernardo Bianchi8, Arcangelo Merla4, Pier Francesco Ferrari1,3.
Abstract
According to embodied simulation theories, others' emotions are recognized by the unconscious mimicking of observed facial expressions, which requires the implicit activation of the motor programs that produce a specific expression. Motor responses performed during the expression of a given emotion are hypothesized to be directly linked to autonomic responses associated with that emotional behavior. We tested this hypothesis in 9 children (M age = 5.66) affected by Moebius syndrome (MBS) and 15 control children (M age = 6.6). MBS is a neurological congenital disorder characterized by underdevelopment of the VI and VII cranial nerves, which results in paralysis of the face. Moebius patients' inability to produce facial expressions impairs their capacity to communicate emotions through the face. We therefore assessed Moebius children's autonomic response to emotional stimuli (video cartoons) by means of functional infrared thermal (fIRT) imaging. Patients showed weaker temperature changes compared to controls, suggesting impaired autonomic activity. They also showed difficulties in recognizing facial emotions from static illustrations. These findings reveal that the impairment of facial movement attenuates the intensity of emotional experience, probably through the diminished activation of autonomic responses associated with emotional stimuli. The current study is the first to investigate emotional responses in MBS children, providing important insights into the role of facial expressions in emotional processing during early development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31093273 PMCID: PMC6476053 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7253768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Moebius subjects' medical cases. The term “laterality” refers to the kind of facial paralysis that can be unilateral or bilateral; the sixth and seventh cranial nerves are usually involved, but other nerves may also be affected. “Associated pathologies” linked to Moebius syndrome can involve possible hand and foot anomalies, muscle hypotonia, hypoacusis, swallowing and speech problems, and Poland syndrome.
| ID no. | Sex | Laterality | Cranial nerves involved | Additional functional deficits and associated pathologies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | Unilateral left | VI, VII | — |
| 2 | M | Bilateral | VI, VII, III, IV | Strabismus, hypotonia, hypoacusia of the right ear, speech deficit (articulation-phonetic disorders), right plagiocephaly, psychomotor delay, epileptic seizures, cardiac crisis |
| 3 | F | Bilateral | VI, VII, XII | Foot malformations |
| 4 | F | Unilateral left | VI, VII, XII | Speech deficit, club feet |
| 5 | M | Bilateral | VI, VII, XII | Club foot, brain stem atrophy with enlargement of the fourth ventricle, hand deformities |
| 6 | F | Unilateral right | VI, VII, XII right | Micrognathia, tongue hypoplasia |
| 7 | F | Bilateral | VI, VII | Bilateral mixed hypoacusia, hypotonia, delayed growth, laryngomalacia, palatal schisis, coloboma of the right optic nerve |
| 8 | M | Bilateral | VI, VII, XII left | Respiratory difficulties, micrognathia, hypotonia, psychomotor delay, club foot |
| 9 | M | Bilateral | VII | No ocular deficits, speech delay |
Figure 1Experimental paradigm. Schematic overview of the experimental paradigm.
Figure 2Example of cartoon pictures presented during TEC-1 (component I, emotion recognition).
Figure 3(a) Thermal modulation in an example control participant and Moebius patient during the “happiness,” “sadness,” and “fear” conditions. In the figure, the inlays present the entire nasal area, but elliptic nasal tip ROIs were used for analyses (A = 297 pixels; MajorAxisLength = 20.35 pixels; MinorAxisLength = 18.64 pixels) [62, 65]. The control participant shows stronger thermal variation during the sadness condition than the Moebius patient. (b) Mean temperature values during each of the experimental conditions, baseline-corrected with respect to the neutral condition. Both control and Moebius participants show a significant nasal tip temperature increase during the “sadness” condition (∗p ≤ 0.001). Means and standard errors (SE) are reported for each condition in both control and Moebius groups.
Descriptive statistics for each group and condition.
| Group | Happiness | Sadness | Fear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Control | 0.199 | 0.364 | 0.216 |
| Moebius | 0.144 | 0.212 | 0.118 | |
| Std. error mean | Control | 0.033 | 0.075 | 0.042 |
| Moebius | 0.030 | 0.057 | 0.023 | |
| Standard deviation | Control | 0.128 | 0.290 | 0.163 |
| Moebius | 0.090 | 0.171 | 0.069 | |
| Variance | Control | 0.016 | 0.084 | 0.026 |
| Moebius | 0.008 | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Figure 4(a) Absolute value of the change in temperature from baseline per participant during each of the experimental conditions. Moebius participants exhibit a lower thermal modulation compared with control participants. (b) Group mean absolute temperature values in control and Moebius participants. Control participants have significantly more intense thermal modulation compared with Moebius participants. Means and standard errors (SE) are reported for both control and Moebius groups.
Figure 5Mean number of correct answers from both control and Moebius participants. During the emotion recognition task (TEC-1), control participants performed better than Moebius participants. Means and standard errors (SE) are reported for both control and Moebius groups.