| Literature DB >> 31093015 |
Sara Bouhaddaoui1,2, Rachida Chabir2, Faouzi Errachidi3, Lahsen El Ghadraoui3, Bouchra El Khalfi1, Meryem Benjelloun3, Abdelaziz Soukri1.
Abstract
Due to its balanced composition in basic nutrients, its richness in vitamins and in minerals, camel milk has a special place in the daily diet of southern populations. The present study aimed at examining some physicochemical and biochemical characteristics of camel milk (Camelus dromedarius) in Morocco. To achieve this aim, three batches of samples of camel milk were collected from various regions (Dakhla, Errachida, and Fès-Meknes) undergoing physicochemical and biochemical analyses. Results showed that Moroccan camel milk is characterized by slight hydronium potential (pH=6.5), low Dornic acidity (15°D), low density (1.029 kg/l), and high content of ashes (8.06 g/l). Likewise, samples had a high content of macronutrients (Fats: 34.09 g/l; Proteins: 32.4 g/l; Sugar: 49.8 g/l) and micronutrients (Vitamin C: 27.53 mg/l; Flavonoids: 29.05 mg EQ/l: total phenolic compounds: 35.45mg GAE/l). In this respect, working on multiple specimens from different Moroccan regions highlighted an analytical diversity from the south to the north. Comparative study of samples from numerous territories all over the world has confirmed this diversity. North African milk is characterized by high content of proteins, fats, and sugar. On the other hand, oriental milk is peculiarized by high vitamin C content.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31093015 PMCID: PMC6481029 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2517293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Geographic distribution of the three studied samples of Camel's milk.
Study of camel milk collected from different regions of Morocco and their comparison with goat's and cow's milk.
| Milk | Camel sources | Templates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Dakhla | Fez-Meknes | Errachidia | Average | Cow | Goat |
| pH | 6.43±0.07 b | 6.60±0.01 a, c | 6.50±0.01b | 6.51±0.085 | 6.79±0.01 | 6.70±0.01 |
| Density (kg/l) | 1.028±0.001 | 1.029±0.0005 | 1.03±0.0005 | 1.029±0.001 | 1.036±0,001 | 1.031±0.001 |
| Acidity (°D) | 15±1 | 17±1a | 13±1 | 15±2 | 18±1 | 17±1 |
| proteins (g/l) | 32.2±0.750 | 33±0.115 | 32.6±0.351 | 32.6±0.4 | 32.4±0.529 | 30.2±0.067 |
| fats (g/l) | 39±1 a, b | 33±1c | 34.9±0.550b, c | 35.6±3.066 | 36±1 | 41±1.050 |
| Sugar (lactose) (g/l) | 56±1.154 a | 45.6±0.503 | 47.8±0.416c | 49.8±7.186 | 42±0.577 | 17±1 |
| Ashes (g/l) | 7.9±0.1 | 8±0.1 | 8.3±0,404 | 8.06±0.321 | 7.6±0.152 | 7.4±0.060 |
| Flavonoids (mgEQ/l) | 30±0.529 b | 27±1c | 30.15±0.145 | 29.05±1.776 | 25.6±0.321 | 31.3±0.20 |
| Polyphenols (mgGAE/l) | 37.85±0.15b, a | 33±1 a, c | 35.5±0.404c, b | 35.45±2.425 | 28±1 | 39.2±0.2 |
| Vitamin C (mg/l) | 30±1a | 29.6±0,351a | 23±1c, b | 27.53±3.93 | 20±1 | 10.7±0.264 |
a: p<0.05 vs. Errachidia.
b: p<0.05 vs. Fez-Meknes.
c: p<0.05 vs. Dakhla.
Daily recovery (fats, proteins, lactose, and vitamin C) insured by milk of the camel and goat's and cow's milk.
| Chemical elements | Milk source | Recovery (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camel | Goat | Cow | Camel | Goat | Cow | |
| Fats (g/l) | 39 | 3.02 | 32.4 | 144.4 | 120 | 120 |
| Proteins (g/l) | 32.2 | 4.1 | 36 | 46 | 5.8 | 51.4 |
| Lactose (g/l) | 56 | 1.7 | 42 | 37.3 | 1.1 | 28 |
| Vitamin C (mg/l) | 30 | 10.7 | 20 | 3300 | 1200 | 2100 |
∗Recovery calculated based on (G Potier de Courcy et al., 2010).
Physicochemical and biochemical characteristics of camel milk from North Africa and East.
| Parameters | Ma1 | Ma2 | Ma3 | Ma4 | Alg1 | Alg2 | Tun | Mau1 | Mau2 | Mau3 | KSA | Pak | Kaz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.43 | 6.47 | 5.67 | 6.65 | 6.41 | 6.47 | 6.38 | 6.33 | 6.6 | 6.77 | 6.45 |
| Acidity (°D) | 13 | 17 | 15 | 19 | 41.9 | 16.75 | 17.2 | 15.2 | 14.45 | 13.25 | 14 | 18 | 26.6 |
| Density (g/l) | 1.030 | 1.029 | 1.028 | 1.026 | 1.026 | 1.032 | 1.020 | 1.027 | 1.028 | 1.028 | ND | 1.015 | 1.03 |
| fats (g/l) | 34.9 | 33 | 39 | 27.2 | 29.9 | 28 | 37.5 | 32.4 | 27.4 | 33.2 | 32 | 26.3 | 59.6 |
| Proteins (g/l) | 32.6 | 33 | 32.2 | 25.5 | ND | 35.68 | 34.15 | 33.2 | 33.1 | 34.1 | 29 | 25.4 | 34.6 |
| Lactose (g/l) | 47.8 | 45.6 | 56 | 43.7 | 28.2 | 43.12 | 42.78 | 43.2 | 44.2 | 36.1 | 44 | 36.5 | 30 |
| Ashes (g/l) | 8.3 | 8 | 7.9 | 8.7 | ND | 7.2 | 7.5 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 7.9 | 7.9 | ND |
| Vitamin C | 23 | 29.9 | 30 | ND | ND | 41.4 | ND | 37.4 | 39.7 | 42.1 | 1170 | ND | 154 |
Ma1. Ma2. Ma3: Maroc1. Maroc2. Maroc3 (this work).
Ma4: Maroc 4 (Ismaili et al,. 2016) [13].
Alg1: Algeria1 (Siboukeur, 2007) [14]; Alg2: Algeria2 (Debbouz and al,. 2014) [15].
Tun: tunisia (Sboui et al,. 2009) [16].
Mau1. Mau2. Mau3: Mauritania1. Mauritania2. Mauritania3 (Ould Moustapha Abdellahi and Ould Hamad Sidi, 2016) [17].
K.S.A.: kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Mehaia, 1995) [18].
KAZ: Kazakhstan (Konuspayeva, 2007) [19].
PAK: Pakistan (Khaskheli, 2004) [20].
Figure 2PCA representation of dromedary milk types and their physicochemical and biochemical characteristics represented on two components.