| Literature DB >> 31092852 |
Chengshan Cai1, Jiexin Ma1, Chunrui Han2, Yi Jin1, Guozhu Zhao3, Xiangwei He4.
Abstract
The scientific name of the traditional Chinese medicinal fungus, Sanghuang, has been clarified and confirmed that it is a new species -Sanghuangporus sanghuang in the recently discovered genus, Sanghuangporus. To maximize the yield of the active ingredients such as the triterpenoids from authentic Sanghuangporus sanghuang, four parameters of the extraction process, including the extraction time, solid-liquid ratio, extraction temperature, and ethanol concentration were determined. The Box-Behnken experimental design and the response surface method were used to optimize the triterpenoid extraction processes of Sanghuangporus sanghuang mycelium. The results showed that the parameters of the triterpenoid extraction processes were not simple linear relationships. Optimum conditions of ultrasonic extraction required an 80% ethanol concentration, a 1:20 solid-liquid ratio, a 20-min extraction time, and a 60 °C extraction temperature, to obtain a maximum triterpenoid extraction of 13.30 mg/g. Antioxidant capacity tests showed that the Sanghuangporus sanghuang triterpenoids had high clearance capabilities for hydroxyl free radicals, superoxide anions, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl free radicals, and 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate) radicals, indicating that the Sanghuangporus sanghuang triterpenoids had high antioxidant activities.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31092852 PMCID: PMC6520348 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43886-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Standard representation of β-amyrin.
Figure 2Effect of different factors on total triterpenoid yield from Sanghuangporus sanghuang. (a) ethanol concentration, (b) solid–liquid ratio, (c) ultrasonic time, (d) ultrasonic temperature.
Design and response surface methodology results.
| Test number | The coding level | Total triterpenoid ratio m g/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.379 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.356 |
| 3 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 12.183 |
| 4 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 12.024 |
| 5 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 12.125 |
| 6 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 12.187 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.376 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 12.024 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12.116 |
| 10 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 12.032 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12.193 |
| 12 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 12.085 |
| 13 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 12.152 |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 12.081 |
| 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12.188 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.352 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.348 |
Figure 3The total triterpenoid ratio from Sanghuangporus sanghuang using response surface methodology. (a) Ethanol concentrations and ultrasonic times, (b) ethanol concentrations and ultrasonic temperatures, (c) ultrasonic times and ultrasonic temperatures.
Variance analysis of regression equations.
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance | Mean sum of square | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 5.53 | 9 | 0.61 | 1900.39 | <0.0001 |
| A-ethanol concentration | 5.941E-003 | 1 | 5.941E-003 | 18.37 | 0.0036 |
| B-ultrasonic time | 3.081E-003 | 1 | 3.081E-003 | 9.53 | 0.0176 |
| C-ultrasonic temperature | 2.080E-003 | 1 | 2.080E-003 | 6.43 | 0.0389 |
| AB | 4.830E-003 | 1 | 4.830E-003 | 14.94 | 0.0062 |
| AC | 4.622E-004 | 1 | 4.622E-004 | 1.43 | 0.2707 |
| BC | 0.013 | 1 | 0.013 | 39.50 | 0.0004 |
| A2 | 1.72 | 1 | 1.72 | 5307.11 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 1.37 | 1 | 1.37 | 4240.37 | <0.0001 |
| C2 | 1.84 | 1 | 1.84 | 5683.52 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 2.263E-003 | 7 | 3.233E-004 | ||
| Lack of fit | 1.446E-003 | 3 | 4.821E-004 | 2.36 | 0.2125 |
| Error | 8.168E-004 | 4 | 2.042E-004 | ||
| Total dispersion | 5.53 | 16 |
Model fit statistics.
| Std. Dev. | 0.018 | R-Squared | 0.9996 |
| Mean | 12.48 | Adj. R-Squared | 0.9991 |
| C.V.% | 0.14 | Pred. R-Squared | 0.9956 |
| PRESS | 0.024 | Adeq. Precision | 96.559 |
Figure 4Antioxidative abilities of Sanghuangporus sanghuang triterpenoids. (a) Hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, (b) superoxide anion clearance ability, (c) free radical clearance ability of DPPH, (d) clearance ability of ABTS.
Box–Behnken design of experimental parameter levels.
| Parameter | Coding level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Ethanol concentration X1/% | 70 | 80 | 90 |
| Ultrasonic time X2/min | 15 | 20 | 25 |
| Ultrasonic temperature X3/°C | 50 | 60 | 70 |