Literature DB >> 31092337

Molecular Subtyping of Clinically Localized Urothelial Carcinoma Reveals Lower Rates of Pathological Upstaging at Radical Cystectomy Among Luminal Tumors.

Yair Lotan1, Stephen A Boorjian2, Jingbin Zhang3, Trinity J Bivalacqua4, Sima P Porten5, Thomas Wheeler6, Seth P Lerner6, Ryan Hutchinson7, Franto Francis7, Elai Davicioni3, Robert S Svatek8, Chun-Liang Chen8, Peter C Black9, Ewan A Gibb3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Upstaging of clinical T1-T2 urothelial carcinoma (UC) to non-organ-confined (NOC) pathological stage ≥T3 or N+ at radical cystectomy (RC) is common. Tools for stratifying patients who may have NOC disease are limited.
OBJECTIVE: To determine an association of a genomic subtyping classifier (GSC) with pathological upstaging in multi-institutional cohort of patients with cT1-T2 UC treated with RC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Precystectomy transurethral specimens from 206 patients with high-grade, cT1-T2, N0M0 UC, who underwent RC without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent GSC testing. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated GSC for upstaging, defined as pT3/T4 and/or pTanyN1-3 disease at RC. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Pathological upstaging occurred in 23% of cT1 and 57% of cT2 cases. Lower rates of upstaging to NOC was seen for luminal versus nonluminal tumors (34% vs 51%, p=0.02). The differences in upstaging were confined to T stage, with no difference in node positivity for luminal versus nonluminal patients (cT1: 13% for both [p>0.9], cT2: 15% and 23% [p=0.6], respectively). Fewer patients with luminal tumors were upstaged to ≥pT3Nany compared with nonluminal tumors (Mantel-Haenszel p=0.002; cT1: 13% vs 30%, cT2: 34% vs 58%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, nonluminal patients were more likely to be upstaged to ≥pT3 at RC (p<0.001). Limitations include retrospective design and sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtyping of clinically localized UC demonstrated that luminal tumors have lower rates of upstaging to non-organ-confined disease compared with nonluminal tumors. If validated, these data can help inform which patients may need multimodal therapy. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Determining whether bladder cancer has spread beyond the bladder is challenging at diagnosis. In this paper, genomics helped identify patients who were more likely to have aggressive disease that has spread outside the bladder. These patients may benefit from chemotherapy prior to surgery.
Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Clinical staging; Gene expression analysis; Molecular subtypes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31092337     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

Review 1.  Genomic Subtyping in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tuomas Jalanko; Joep J de Jong; Ewan A Gibb; Roland Seiler; Peter C Black
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Bladder cancer under staging: still unavoidable?

Authors:  Angelo Naselli; Andrea Guarneri
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

3.  Intratumoral Switch of Molecular Phenotype and Overall Survival in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Camilla De Carlo; Marina Valeri; Noemi Rudini; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Miriam Cieri; Grazia Maria Elefante; Federica D'antonio; Rodolfo Hurle; Laura Giordano; Alessandra Bressan; Massimo Lazzeri; Matteo Perrino; Giorgio Guazzoni; Luigi Maria Terracciano; Piergiuseppe Colombo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Immunohistochemical Assays for Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtyping: Optimizing Parsimony and Performance of Lund Taxonomy Classifiers.

Authors:  Céline S C Hardy; Hamid Ghaedi; Ava Slotman; Gottfrid Sjödahl; Robert J Gooding; David M Berman; Chelsea L Jackson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant Treatment in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: From the Beginning to the Latest Developments.

Authors:  Giandomenico Roviello; Martina Catalano; Raffaella Santi; Matteo Santoni; Ilaria Camilla Galli; Andrea Amorosi; Wojciech Polom; Ugo De Giorgi; Gabriella Nesi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  Genomic heterogeneity in bladder cancer: challenges and possible solutions to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua J Meeks; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Bishoy M Faltas; John A Taylor; Thomas W Flaig; David J DeGraff; Emil Christensen; Benjamin L Woolbright; David J McConkey; Lars Dyrskjøt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Heterogeneity in NECTIN4 Expression Across Molecular Subtypes of Urothelial Cancer Mediates Sensitivity to Enfortumab Vedotin.

Authors:  Carissa E Chu; Jonathan Chou; Martin Sjöström; Emily A Egusa; Ewan A Gibb; Michelle L Badura; Jun Zhu; Vadim S Koshkin; Bradley A Stohr; Maxwell V Meng; Raj S Pruthi; Terence W Friedlander; Yair Lotan; Peter C Black; Sima P Porten; Felix Y Feng
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Moving towards Personalized Medicine in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Juan Carlos Pardo; Vicenç Ruiz de Porras; Andrea Plaja; Cristina Carrato; Olatz Etxaniz; Oscar Buisan; Albert Font
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.