Literature DB >> 31090091

TMPRSS2-ERG fusions linked to prostate cancer racial health disparities: A focus on Africa.

James Blackburn1,2, Stefano Vecchiarelli1, Erin E Heyer1, Sean M Patrick3, Ruth J Lyons1, Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri1, Smit van Zyl4, M S Riana Bornman3, Tim R Mercer1,2,5, Vanessa M Hayes1,2,3,4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The androgen-regulated gene TMPRSS2 to the ETS transcription factor gene ERG fusion is the most common genomic alteration acquired during prostate tumorigenesis and biased toward men of European ancestry. In contrast, African American men present with more advanced disease, yet their tumors are less likely to acquire TMPRSS2-ERG. Data for Africa is scarce.
METHODS: RNA was made available for genomic analyses from 181 prostate tissue biopsy cores from Black South African men, 94 with and 87 without pathological evidence for prostate cancer. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to screen for the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, while transcript junction coordinates and isoform frequencies, including novel gene fusions, were determined using targeted RNA sequencing.
RESULTS: Here we report a frequency of 13% for TMPRSS2-ERG in tumors from Black South Africans. Present in 12/94 positive versus 1/87 cancer negative prostate tissue cores, this suggests a 92.62% predictivity for a positive cancer diagnosis (P = 0.0031). At a frequency of almost half that reported for African Americans and roughly a quarter of that reported for men of European ancestry, acquisition of TMPRSS2-ERG appears to be inversely associated with aggressive prostate cancer. Further support was provided by linking the presence of TMPRSS2-ERG to low-grade disease in younger patients (P = 0.0466), with higher expressing distal ERG fusion junction coordinates.
CONCLUSIONS: Only the second study of its kind for the African continent, we support a link between TMPRSS2-ERG status and prostate cancer racial health disparity beyond the borders of the United States. We call for urgent evaluation of androgen deprivation therapy within Africa.
© 2019 The Authors. The Prostate Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African ancestry; TMPRSS2-zzm321990ERG; early-onset; fusion gene; prostate cancer; racial health disparity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31090091      PMCID: PMC6617820          DOI: 10.1002/pros.23823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


INTRODUCTION

The most frequent somatic alteration in prostate cancer (PCa) involves an intrachromosomal translocation or deletion event on the long arm of chromosome 21. This genomic alteration appears to occur early in tumourigenesis, resulting in fusion of the androgen‐regulated transmembrane protease serine 2 gene (TMPRSS2) to a member of the transcription factor erythroblastosis virus E26 transforming sequence family (ERG)1, leading to androgen‐dependent overexpression of ERG. 2 The frequency of TMPRSS2ERG fusions in PCa shows a notable racial disparity. A recent meta‐analysis confirmed the highest prevalence rates in men of European ancestry (49%), with lower levels reported for men of Asian (27%) and African (25%) ancestries.3 The latter includes three African American studies (73/260; 28%) and a single study from West Africa, specifically Ghana (47/262; 18%). There also appears to be racial discordance in the mechanism of TMPRSS2ERG occurrence, with African Americans most commonly exhibiting fusion through deletion, and European and Asian Americans through translocation.4 Intriguingly, African ancestry is significantly associated with high‐grade (Gleason score ≥ 8) PCa,5 which questions the role of TMPRSS2ERG fusions in tumor development in African populations. Reporting a 2.1‐fold increase in high‐grade PCa presentation in Black South African men compared with African Americans,6 we sought to determine the frequency, composition, and clinicopathological association of acquired TMPRSS2ERG fusions within non‐American men of African ancestry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological overview and ethics

Patients were enrolled at time of diagnosis as part of the Southern African Prostate Cancer Study (SAPCS)6 and presented at one of the participating urological clinics within the Provinces of Limpopo or Gauteng of South Africa. All self‐identified ethnically as Black South African, including a single Black Zimbabwean, from one of 11 ethnic groupings, with age and prostate specific antigen levels recorded at time of diagnosis (Table 1). Clinicopathological analyses confirmed 94 men with PCa (positive Gleason score) and 87 without PCa (negative Gleason score), either with (n = 56) or without (n = 31) the presence of benign prostate hyperplasia.
Table 1

Clinical and pathological characteristics

PCaBPHNo PCa
Number of patients (n = 181)945631
EthnicityPedi392722
Sotho512
Swazi232
Tsonga861
Tswana340
Venda862
Ndebele1850
Zulu632
Xhosa300
Colored110
Shona100
Median (IQR) age at diagnosis in years69 (44‐94)69 (53‐89)67 (50‐92)
Median (IQR) PSA at diagnosis ng/mL51.5 (4.4‐2000)17.3 (2.2‐1000)16.1 (2‐1475)
Pathological gradingISUP118
ISUP218
ISUP312
ISUP423
ISUP523

Abbreviations: BPH, benign prostate hyperplasia; IQR, interquartile range; ISUP, International Society of Urological Pathology grading system; PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate specific antigen.

Clinical and pathological characteristics Abbreviations: BPH, benign prostate hyperplasia; IQR, interquartile range; ISUP, International Society of Urological Pathology grading system; PCa, prostate cancer; PSA, prostate specific antigen. The study was approved by the Medical/Human Research Ethics Committee's (MREC or HREC) from the University of Limpopo's Medunsa Campus (MREC/H/28/2009) and the University of Pretoria's Faculty of Health Sciences (HREC #43/2010) in South Africa. Patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. Prostate tissue samples were shipped to the Garvan Institute of Medical Research under the Republic of South Africa Department of Health Export Permit, in accordance with the National Health Act 2003 (J1/2/4/2 #1/12). Analysis of the samples was performed in accordance with St Vincent's Hospital (SVH) HREC site‐specific approval (#SVH15/227).

TMPRSS2‐ERG screening

RNA was prepared from 181 prostate tissue core biopsies. Presence of the TMPRSS2ERG fusion gene was determined using two sets of previously described reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) primer pairs,1 including a single forward primer located in exon 1 of TMPRSS2: 5′‐CAGGAGGCGGAGGCGGA‐3′ and two ERG reverse primers located in exon 4: 5′‐GTAGGCACACTCAAACAACGACTGG‐3′ and exon 6: 5′‐GGCGTTGTAGCTGGGGGTGAG‐3′ (Figure 1A). PC3 and VCaP cell lines represented TMPRSS2ERG fusion gene negative and positive controls, respectively.
Figure 1

Summary of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene diagnosis. (A) Schematic representation of the fusion gene resulting from a genomic rearrangement within TMPRSS2 intron 1 and ERG intron 3. Locations of forward TMPRSS2 and reverse ERG PCR primers are shown as arrows. (B) Difference in age at diagnosis for TMPRSS2‐ERG positive versus negative low‐grade (ISUP 1 and 2) and high‐grade (ISUP 3 to 5) tumors

Summary of TMPRSS2ERG fusion gene diagnosis. (A) Schematic representation of the fusion gene resulting from a genomic rearrangement within TMPRSS2 intron 1 and ERG intron 3. Locations of forward TMPRSS2 and reverse ERG PCR primers are shown as arrows. (B) Difference in age at diagnosis for TMPRSS2ERG positive versus negative low‐grade (ISUP 1 and 2) and high‐grade (ISUP 3 to 5) tumors

Targeted fusion RNA sequencing

Targeted RNA sequencing (RNA CaptureSeq) was used to generate a snapshot validation for RT‐PCR screening and to define the exact TMPRSS2ERG fusion transcript junction coordinates. In brief, sequencing libraries were prepared from 1 μg of patient RNA using the KAPA Stranded RNA‐Seq Library Preparation Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Capture was performed according to manufacturer's instructions (Roche) using custom biotinylated probes including known PCa associated chromosomal translocations. Captured libraries were sequenced to standard depth (125‐bp paired‐end) using the Illumina HiSeq. 2500 System v4 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Post‐filtering, reads were mapped to human reference genome hg38 with STAR v2.4.2a7 and fusion genes identified with STAR‐Fusion and FusionCatcher v0.99.6 beta.8 Only the fusion transcript isoforms identified by both programs within each patient sample were used in further analysis.

TMPRSS2‐ERG expression

Expression of the TMPRSS2ERG fusion gene in each patient was calculated by normalizing the total number of fusion supporting reads to individual sequencing library sizes.

Statistics

Variables between groups were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Frequency and distribution of TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion

The frequency of TMPRSS2ERG fusion gene occurrence was 12.8% (12/94) in PCa and 1.5% (1/87) in noncancerous prostate tissue. Thus the presence of TMPRSS2ERG in this population is 92.62% predictive for a positive diagnosis of PCa (P = 0.0031), with a negative predictive value of 51.25%. Although rare, we observed an even distribution for TMPRSS2ERG in patients defined at clinical presentation by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)9 as high‐grade (ISUP 3 to 5; Gleason score ≥ 4 + 3; n = 6) or low‐grade (ISUP 1 and 2; Gleason score ≤ 3 + 4; n = 6) (Table 1). We found the median age at diagnosis for patients presenting with low‐grade TMPRSS2ERG positive tumors (65.5 years) was almost 8 years younger than patients with low‐grade TMPRSS2ERG negative tumors (73 years, P = 0.04656) and almost 7 years younger than TMPRSS2ERG positive high‐grade tumors (72 years) (Figure 1B).

TMPRSS2‐ERG validation, isoforms and ERG expression

Using our targeted RNA CaptureSeq method, we validated the RT‐PCR screening approach confirming TMPRSS2ERG status for the 12 fusion positive and 12 randomly selected early‐onset (range 44 to 62 years) fusion negative PCa cases. Each TMPRSS2ERG fusion positive tumor presented with minimally two and maximally five TMPRSS2ERG fusion isoforms (total of 40 fusion junctions), with three patients also presenting a novel fusion event: RP11‐356O9.1‐ETV1 in two patients and PTPRKLAMA2 in a single patient. No novel fusion events were identified within the fusion negative tumors. Consistent with previous findings, the most common TMPRSS2 fusion junctions were located within the first intron downstream of three alternative noncoding exons, with only two samples utilizing TMPRSS2 fusion coordinates beyond exon 2 (4/40) (Figure 2A). Similarly, ERG fusion junctions were dominated by a fusion upstream of exon 4 (24/40), with the second most common being a fusion upstream of exon 2 (8/40, traditionally noncoding). Within each patient tumor, ERG fusion coordinates always occurred either upstream or downstream of exon 3, but never both (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion gene isoforms detected in 12 prostate tumors from African patients. (A) TMPRSS2 and ERG gene structures and TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion isoform prevalence across all patients based on the GENCODE v27 comprehensive exon annotation. Bar charts quantify the number of samples expressing each isoform. For simplicity, TMPRSS2 junctions beyond exon 1 are depicted with exon 1a. Black line represents retained intronic sequence. (B) Isoform prevalence, represented as fusion position between TMPRSS2 and ERG for each patient. Light and dark blue panels denote proximal and distal ERG junction positions. (C) Boxplot of TMPRSS2‐ERG expression relative to ERG fusion position. (D) Boxplot of patient age at diagnosis relative to ERG fusion position. Each dot represents a single patient sample [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

TMPRSS2ERG fusion gene isoforms detected in 12 prostate tumors from African patients. (A) TMPRSS2 and ERG gene structures and TMPRSS2ERG fusion isoform prevalence across all patients based on the GENCODE v27 comprehensive exon annotation. Bar charts quantify the number of samples expressing each isoform. For simplicity, TMPRSS2 junctions beyond exon 1 are depicted with exon 1a. Black line represents retained intronic sequence. (B) Isoform prevalence, represented as fusion position between TMPRSS2 and ERG for each patient. Light and dark blue panels denote proximal and distal ERG junction positions. (C) Boxplot of TMPRSS2ERG expression relative to ERG fusion position. (D) Boxplot of patient age at diagnosis relative to ERG fusion position. Each dot represents a single patient sample [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Though not statistically significant due to small sample size, there was a striking difference in the expression levels of patients presenting with either the proximal or distal ERG fusion coordinates, with higher expression detected from the distal isoforms (Figure 2C). Additionally, patients possessing the higher expressing distal ERG fusion coordinates presented earlier at diagnosis, with a median age of 69 years (range 55 to 73 years) compared with the three patients with the lower expressing proximal coordinates, at 72, 78, and 81 years (Figure 2D).

DISCUSSION

Although genomic instability is assumed to increase with tumor progression,10 we show that Black South African men with significant high‐grade PCa have lower frequencies of TMPRSS2ERG fusion than men of European ancestry. When present, we show a tendency for association with early‐onset low‐grade PCa presentation, with higher expression from distal ERG junction coordinates. Experimental data performed in prostate epithelial cells supports the hypothesis that increased androgen levels in younger men may be directly related to the increase in TMPRSS2ERG expression,11 while a previous European‐based study reported accumulation of nonandrogen associated genomic alterations with patient and tumor age, dependent on TMPRSS2ERG status.12 Interestingly, we identified two novel fusion events including ETV1—commonly fused in PCa—with novel partner RP11‐356O9.1 (in 2/12 TMPRSS2ERG positive tumors), and the well‐known colorectal fusion gene PTPRK 13 fused with novel partner LAMA2. While no novel fusion events were identified in the 12 TMPRSS2ERG negative tumors using our targeted RNA CaptureSeq method, through the first deep whole genome sequencing of tumor‐normal pairs from six African high‐risk treatment‐naïve PCa patients, we recently reported a significant increase in small somatic variation (tumor mutational burden; 3.8 mutations/Mbp), lack of ETS fusions and under‐representation of complex genomic rearrangements, compared with European‐derived matched tumors.14 As such, we have recently called for much needed genome profiling of PCa within African populations to help explain the apparent racial health disparities.15 While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) administered through hormone blockers are traditionally used for treating advanced PCa, in Southern Africa orchidectomy is still common practice. Either way, the goal is to inhibit androgen receptor (AR) signaling.16 Combining ADT with docetaxel, a taxane chemotherapy, has been shown to provide further survival benefit to patients.17 The positive effect of docetaxel is believed to act, at least in part, through impairing AR activity.18 In turn, TMPRSS2ERG fusion positive patients appear to respond well to ADT and neoadjuvant docetaxel, compared with untreated patients.19 More recently, a large study out of China suggests that TMPRSS2ERG fusion is a biomarker for predicting response to ADT.20 The lack of androgen‐regulated TMPRSS2ERG fusion within African populations biased toward aggressive disease presentation, calls for immediate assessment of the true benefit of ADT, taking into consideration significant long‐term side effects of the more commonly practiced orchidectomy, within the continent.

SUMMARY

To the best of our knowledge, this is the second only PCa study of its kind for Africa and the first for southern Africa. Built on observations made within African Americans and combined with the single study from Ghana, it is becoming evident that TMPRSS2ERG fusions are significantly less common in driving prostate tumourigenesis within populations from Africa. This is further supported by an inverse association between presence and adverse outcomes, as well as our observed link with younger‐onset low‐risk disease.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

VMH, JB, and TRM designed the study. SMP, SvZ, and MSRB consented, performed clinical evaluation, and processed the samples. JB, SV, and RJL performed the experiments. JB, EEH, WJ, and VMH performed analysis and interpretation of results. JB and VMH drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
  19 in total

1.  Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden and Initiating Driver Mutations in African Men with Treatment-Naïve, High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Eva K F Chan; Tingting Gong; Desiree C Petersen; Anton M F Kalsbeek; Philip A Venter; Phillip D Stricker; M S Riana Bornman; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Frequent PTPRK-RSPO3 fusions and RNF43 mutations in colorectal traditional serrated adenoma.

Authors:  Shigeki Sekine; Satoshi Yamashita; Taro Tanabe; Taiki Hashimoto; Hiroshi Yoshida; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Motohiro Kojima; Kazuya Shinmura; Yutaka Saito; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Toshikazu Ushijima; Atsushi Ochiai
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 7.996

3.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Genomic Instability and Cancer.

Authors:  Yixin Yao; Wei Dai
Journal:  J Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  2014

5.  Tubulin-targeting chemotherapy impairs androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Meng-Lei Zhu; Craig M Horbinski; Mark Garzotto; David Z Qian; Tomasz M Beer; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Starving the addiction: new opportunities for durable suppression of AR signaling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karen E Knudsen; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusions are strongly linked to young patient age in low-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Steurer; Pascale Sophia Mayer; Meike Adam; Antje Krohn; Christina Koop; Daniel Ospina-Klinck; Ali Attarchi Tehrani; Ronald Simon; Pierre Tennstedt; Markus Graefen; Corinna Wittmer; Benedikt Brors; Christoph Plass; Jan Korbel; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Guido Sauter; Hartwig Huland; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Prostate cancer genomics and racial health disparity.

Authors:  Vanessa M Hayes; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; M S Riana Bornman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-11-30

9.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusions linked to prostate cancer racial health disparities: A focus on Africa.

Authors:  James Blackburn; Stefano Vecchiarelli; Erin E Heyer; Sean M Patrick; Ruth J Lyons; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Smit van Zyl; M S Riana Bornman; Tim R Mercer; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Clinical presentation of prostate cancer in black South Africans.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tindall; L Richard Monare; Desiree C Petersen; Smit van Zyl; Rae-Anne Hardie; Alpheus M Segone; Philip A Venter; M S Riana Bornman; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  10 in total

1.  Psychosocial Stress, Glucocorticoid Signaling, and Prostate Cancer Health Disparities in African American Men.

Authors:  Leanne Woods-Burnham; Laura Stiel; Shannalee R Martinez; Evelyn S Sanchez-Hernandez; Herbert C Ruckle; Frankis G Almaguel; Mariana C Stern; Lisa R Roberts; David R Williams; Susanne Montgomery; Carlos A Casiano
Journal:  Cancer Health Disparities       Date:  2020

2.  Prostate Cancer Genomics Research Disparities in Africa: Advancing Knowledge in Resource Constrained Settings.

Authors:  Pedro W Fernandez
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Fusion Genes in Prostate Cancer: A Comparison in Men of African and European Descent.

Authors:  Rebecca Morgan; Dulcie Keeley; E Starr Hazard; Emma H Allott; Bethany Wolf; Stephen J Savage; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Sebastiano Gattoni-Celli; Gary Hardiman
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

4.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusions linked to prostate cancer racial health disparities: A focus on Africa.

Authors:  James Blackburn; Stefano Vecchiarelli; Erin E Heyer; Sean M Patrick; Ruth J Lyons; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Smit van Zyl; M S Riana Bornman; Tim R Mercer; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 5.  A Review of Cancer Genetics and Genomics Studies in Africa.

Authors:  Solomon O Rotimi; Oluwakemi A Rotimi; Bodour Salhia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  An overview of cancer health disparities: new approaches and insights and why they matter.

Authors:  Tsion Zewdu Minas; Maeve Kiely; Anuoluwapo Ajao; Stefan Ambs
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 7.  The Impact of African Ancestry on Prostate Cancer Disparities in the Era of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Deyana D Lewis; Cheryl D Cropp
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Genome-wide interrogation of structural variation reveals novel African-specific prostate cancer oncogenic drivers.

Authors:  Tingting Gong; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Jue Jiang; Cali Willet; Tracy Chew; Sean M Patrick; Ruth J Lyons; Anne-Maree Haynes; Gabriela Pasqualim; Ilma Simoni Brum; Phillip D Stricker; Shingai B A Mutambirwa; Rosemarie Sadsad; Anthony T Papenfuss; Riana M S Bornman; Eva K F Chan; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 15.266

9.  TMPRSS2-ERG fusion impacts anterior tumor location in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kosj Yamoah; Priti Lal; Shivanshu Awasthi; Arash O Naghavi; Robert J Rounbehler; Travis Gerke; Anders E Berglund; Julio M Pow-Sang; Edward M Schaeffer; Jasreman Dhillon; Jong Y Park; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Histone Demethylase KDM7A Regulates Androgen Receptor Activity, and Its Chemical Inhibitor TC-E 5002 Overcomes Cisplatin-Resistance in Bladder Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Kyoung-Hwa Lee; Byung-Chan Kim; Seung-Hwan Jeong; Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Cheol Kwak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.