Literature DB >> 31088914

Signature Patterns for Top-Down and Bottom-Up Information Processing via Cross-Frequency Coupling in Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Christian D Márton1,2, Makoto Fukushima2,3,4, Corrie R Camalier2, Simon R Schultz5, Bruno B Averbeck2.   

Abstract

Predictive coding is a theoretical framework that provides a functional interpretation of top-down and bottom-up interactions in sensory processing. The theory suggests there are differences in message passing up versus down the cortical hierarchy. These differences result from the linear feedforward of prediction errors, and the nonlinear feedback of predictions. This implies that cross-frequency interactions should predominate top-down. But it remains unknown whether these differences are expressed in cross-frequency interactions in the brain. Here we examined bidirectional cross-frequency coupling across four sectors of the auditory hierarchy in the macaque. We computed two measures of cross-frequency coupling, phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) and amplitude-amplitude coupling (AAC). Our findings revealed distinct patterns for bottom-up and top-down information processing among cross-frequency interactions. Both top-down and bottom-up interactions made prominent use of low frequencies: low-to-low-frequency (theta, alpha, beta) and low-frequency-to-high- gamma couplings were predominant top-down, while low-frequency-to-low-gamma couplings were predominant bottom-up. These patterns were largely preserved across coupling types (PAC and AAC) and across stimulus types (natural and synthetic auditory stimuli), suggesting that they are a general feature of information processing in auditory cortex. Our findings suggest the modulatory effect of low frequencies on gamma-rhythms in distant regions is important for bidirectional information transfer. The finding of low-frequency-to-low-gamma interactions in the bottom-up direction suggest that nonlinearities may also play a role in feedforward message passing. Altogether, the patterns of cross-frequency interaction we observed across the auditory hierarchy are largely consistent with the predictive coding framework.
Copyright © 2019 Márton et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; cross-frequency coupling; information processing; neural coding; predictive coding; top downzzm321990

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31088914      PMCID: PMC6520641          DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0467-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  eNeuro        ISSN: 2373-2822


  56 in total

1.  Attention samples stimuli rhythmically.

Authors:  Ayelet Nina Landau; Pascal Fries
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.

Authors:  João R Sato; André Fujita; Elisson F Cardoso; Carlos E Thomaz; Michael J Brammer; Edson Amaro
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The origin of extracellular fields and currents--EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Costas A Anastassiou; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of attentional selection.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; George Karmos; Ashesh D Mehta; Istvan Ulbert; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Giraud; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Differential coding of conspecific vocalizations in the ventral auditory cortical stream.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Richard C Saunders; David A Leopold; Mortimer Mishkin; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Dynamics of Active Sensing and perceptual selection.

Authors:  Charles E Schroeder; Donald A Wilson; Thomas Radman; Helen Scharfman; Peter Lakatos
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Parametric estimation of cross-frequency coupling.

Authors:  B C M van Wijk; A Jha; W Penny; V Litvak
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Afiqah Yusuf; Daryl E Wilson; Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hierarchical models in the brain.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

1.  Learning improves decoding of odor identity with phase-referenced oscillations in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Justin Losacco; Daniel Ramirez-Gordillo; Jesse Gilmer; Diego Restrepo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 8.140

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.