Oscar E Medina1, Jaime Gallego2, Laura G Restrepo3, Farid B Cortés4, Camilo A Franco5. 1. Grupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Departamento de Procesos y Energía, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia. oemedinae@unal.edu.co. 2. Química de Recursos Energéticos y Medio Ambiente, Instituto de Química, Universidad de Antioquia UdeA, Calle 70 No. 52-21, Medellín 050010, Colombia. andres.gallego@udea.edu.co. 3. Grupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Departamento de Procesos y Energía, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia. lgrestrepob@unal.edu.co. 4. Grupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Departamento de Procesos y Energía, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia. fbcortes@unal.edu.co. 5. Grupo de Investigación en Fenómenos de Superficie-Michael Polanyi, Departamento de Procesos y Energía, Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín 050034, Colombia. caafrancoar@unal.edu.co.
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the regenerative effect of functionalized CeO2±δ nanoparticles with a mass fraction of 0.89% of NiO and 1.1% of PdO in adsorption and subsequent decomposition of n-C7 asphaltenes in steam gasification processes. During each regeneration cycle, the adsorption capacity and the catalytic activity of the nanoparticles were evaluated. To estimate the adsorption capacity of the nanoparticles, adsorption kinetics were studied at a fixed concentration of n-C7 asphaltenes of 10 mg·L-1 as well as adsorption isotherms at three different temperatures at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C. To evaluate the catalytic activity, the loss of mass of the nanoparticles was evaluated by isothermal conversions with a thermogravimetric analyzer at 230 °C, 240 °C, and 250 °C, and at non-isothermal conditions involving a heating from 100 °C to 600 °C at a 20 °C·min-1 heating rate. The asphaltenes showed a high affinity for being adsorbed over the nanoparticles surface, due to the nanoparticles-asphaltene interactions are stronger than those that occur between asphaltene-asphaltene, and this was maintained during nine evaluated regeneration cycles as observed in the Henry's constant that increased slightly, with changes of 21%, 26% and 31% for 25 °C, 55 °C and 75 °C. Polanyi's adsorption potential decreases by 2.6% for the same amount adsorbed from the first cycle to the ninth. In addition, the catalytic activity of the nanoparticles did not change significantly, showing that they decompose 100% of the n-C7 asphaltenes in all cycles. However, the small decrease in the adsorption capacity and catalytic activity of the nanoparticles is mainly due to the presence and change in concentration and ratio of certain elements such as oxygen, iron or others at the surface of the nanoparticle as shown by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. Thermodynamic parameters of adsorption such as Δ H a d s o , Δ S a d s o , and Δ G a d s o and the effective activation energy (Ea) were calculated to compare adsorptive and catalytic performance during each cycle. There is an increase of 9.3% and 2.6% in the case of entropy and enthalpy, respectively, and a decrease of 0.5%, 3.1% and 6.5% for 25 °C, 55 °C and 75 °C respectively for the Gibss free energy from cycle 1 to cycle 9. It was found that these parameters are correlated with the Ce concentration and oxidation state ratios (Ce3+/Ce4+ couple) at the surface.
The main objective of this study is to evaluatethe regenerative effect of functionalized CeO2±δ nanoparticles with a mass fraction of 0.89% of NiO and 1.1% of PdO in adsorption and subsequent decomposition of n-C7 asphaltenes in steam gasification processes. During each regeneration cycle, the adsorption capacity and thecatalytic activity of the nanoparticles were evaluated. To estimatethe adsorption capacity of the nanoparticles, adsorption kinetics were studied at a fixed concentration of n-C7 asphaltenes of 10 mg·L-1 as well as adsorption isotherms at three different temperatures at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C. To evaluatethecatalytic activity, the loss of mass of the nanoparticles was evaluated by isothermal conversions with a thermogravimetric analyzer at 230 °C, 240 °C, and 250 °C, and at non-isothermal conditions involving a heating from 100 °C to 600 °C at a 20 °C·min-1 heating rate. Theasphaltenes showed a high affinity for being adsorbed over the nanoparticles surface, due to the nanoparticles-asphaltene interactions are stronger than those that occur between asphaltene-asphaltene, and this was maintained during nine evaluated regeneration cycles as observed in the Henry's constant that increased slightly, with changes of 21%, 26% and 31% for 25 °C, 55 °C and 75 °C. Polanyi's adsorption potential decreases by 2.6% for the same amount adsorbed from the first cycle to the ninth. In addition, thecatalytic activity of the nanoparticles did not change significantly, showing that they decompose 100% of then-C7 asphaltenes in all cycles. However, the small decrease in the adsorption capacity and catalytic activity of the nanoparticles is mainly due to the presence and change in concentration and ratio of certain elements such as oxygen, iron or others at the surface of the nanoparticle as shown by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses. Thermodynamic parameters of adsorption such as Δ H a d s o , Δ S a d s o , and Δ G a d s o and the effective activation energy (Ea) were calculated to compare adsorptive and catalytic performance during each cycle. There is an increase of 9.3% and 2.6% in thecase of entropy and enthalpy, respectively, and a decrease of 0.5%, 3.1% and 6.5% for 25 °C, 55 °C and 75 °C respectively for the Gibss free energy from cycle 1 to cycle 9. It was found that these parameters are correlated with theCe concentration and oxidation stateratios (Ce3+/Ce4+couple) at the surface.
With the reduction of conventional oil reserves and the growth of global energy demand, it is necessary to restore or increase these reserves by encouraging the production of heavy (HO) and extra-heavy oils (EHO) [1,2]. However, these type of crude oils present difficulties in production, transport, and refinery, which implies an increase in costs. This is because they are characterized by a lowAmerican Petroleum Institute (API) gravity [3,4,5,6,7] and a high viscosity, due mainly to the high content of asphaltenes [8,9]. For this reason, enhanced oil recovery methods (EOR) have been developed to facilitatethe extraction of HO and EHO including chemical processes such as polymer flooding and thermal processes [10,11,12]. Thermal EOR methods are divided into two groups: those that use hot fluid (water, steam) from the surface to transfer the energy and those that generate chemical reactions in crude oil during the injection process such as in-situ combustion (ISC). In particular, steam injection is performed by continuous or cyclic injection [13] mainly focused on oil viscosity reduction and thermal expansion. Cyclic steam injection is the most used mechanism due to its easy implementation in the field. It consists of a single well operation where the steam is injected over a certain time [14]. This is followed by the soaking stage (from one to three weeks), where the energy contained in the steam is transferred to the formation and the reservoir fluids. After, the well is opened for production [15]. When production declines to such a point that it ceases to be profitable, a second cycle can be carried out to increase production. In this way, several cycles can be performed until it is not profitable for the production that is projected [16].However, this method involves certain problems. As steam injection cycles are performed, the lighter components of thecrude oil matrix are vaporized [17]. The produced crude oil undergoes an increase in thecracking activation energy, and a heavier residual oil is generated due to the loss of the light components [18,19]. Other problems associated with this technique include the decrease in performance as the steam is injected cyclically and the operating temperature ranges do not exceed 300 °C [16]. Hence, permanent improvement in theoil quality cannot be achieved since theasphaltenecompounds start their decomposition around 450 °C in a steam atmosphere [13,20,21].Consequently, some catalytic agents such as nanoparticles have been used for the adsorption [21,22,23,24,25] and subsequent transformation of theasphaltenes [26,27,28,29,30,31]. This is due to nanoparticle properties, such as size, surface area, and surface energy density, among others, that favors the application to theHO and EHO reservoirs [13,20,21,25,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Some nanoparticles that have been used in steam gasification [25] are derived from transition element oxides, such as nanoparticles of Co3O4, NiO, Fe3O4 [20]. Also, there are functionalized materials supported on silica [13], alumina [39], ceria [40], titania [20], among others [41,42,43]. In these studies, it was found that thecatalytic activity is affected by the nature of theoxide and the interactions that occur between asphaltenes and nanoparticles, and it was shown that with the presence of the nanoparticles the activation energy significantly decreases [8,44,45]. Also, it was found that the functionalization of the nanoparticles improves their catalytic behavior by enhancing theheavy oilcompounds decomposition [40].The implementation of nanocatalysts promotes the generation of several reactions, such as CO2 reduction, water-gas shift [46], methanization [47], partial oxidation [48], Boudouard [49] and steam reforming reactions [28,34,50,51]. Maintaining the reaction rate during steam injection cycles requires catalysts capable of being regenerated in-situ and having an appropriate half-life. Due to the redox behavior of CeO2±δ, this material has regenerative autocatalytic properties which means that the result after any catalytic process is the same as initially, where one of thecomponents of the reaction is the one that acts as a catalyst [52]. This will allow it to reverse the oxidation state or the loss of an electron, from Ce4+ to Ce3+, indicating that it would return to its initial conditions, allowing the nanoparticles to be reutilized and making possible a better use of their properties. Thecatalyticcharacter of the redox cycle (Ce3+/Ce4+) has been demonstrated in reactions such as CH4/CO2 reforming [53]. However, until now, the application of this material as a supporting agent or catalyst for its regeneration in adsorption-decomposition cycles of heavy compounds has not been reported.This property of CeO2±δ is due to thechanges in oxidation state according to the stimuli to which it is subjected. This behavior allows it to participate in several chemical reactions, which in turn allow it to reverse its oxidation state, returning it to its initial state [54]. Another proposed mechanism for theceria regeneration and its return to the initial state is proposed by Das et al. (2007), who suggest that the mixture of valence states on the surface of CeO2±δ nanoparticles acts as an antioxidant, allowing it to release free radicals [55].Furthermore, the addition of transition element oxides, such as NiO, and noble element oxides, such as PdO, can improve thecatalytic performance of the support through a synergetic effect known as strong metal support interaction phenomena (SMSI) [56]. Other studies show that ceria as support has a synergistic effect with nickel highly dispersed in zeolite socony moil-five (IFM) structures, reducing the start temperature of thewater gas shift (WGS) reaction to low temperatures of around of 230 °C [57]. As for Pd, it increases the interactions between the support and the gases produced through the production of formiate species. When ceria returns to its initial state, hydrogen release reactions and a generation of free radicals will occur again, which indicates that a cycle of regeneration or autocatalytic reaction has been developed. This could allow theconservation of its capacity of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption and decomposition, while the heavy molecules could become smaller as each cycle occurs and could decrease the problems related to heavy and extra heavy oils. For this reason, through experiments of adsorption and thermogravimetric analysis, the affinity for asphaltenes and catalytic activity of NiO and PdO nanoparticles supported on CeO2±δ were designed [41]. In the development of this study, the loads of the transition element oxides (TEO) on the support were optimized to generate a greater asphalteneconversion with steam present at low temperatures (220 °C), and it was found that with a mass fraction of 0.89% and 1.1% of NiO and PdO, respectively, it was possible to maximize theconversion of theasphaltenes to 100% in less than 80 min.It is worth mentioning that, to the best of our knowledge, there has not been any report in the scientific literature of nanoparticle regeneration (adsorption/steam gasification cycles) for thermal enhanced oil recovery processes. Therefore, the main objective of this work was to evaluatethe regenerative capacity of CeO2±δ nanoparticles with the optimal loads on their surface through the evaluation of several cycles of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption/catalysis in a steam gasification process. The evaluation has taken into account the influence of the redox cycle (Ce3+/Ce4+) on the self-regeneration of CeO2±δ. This work will open a new approach for future studies on the application of nanocatalysts in regenerative processes during EOR applications.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Then-C7 asphaltenes were extracted from an extra heavy Colombian crude oil using an excess amount of n-heptane (99%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a volume ratio of 40:1. Toluene (99.5%, Merk KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to prepare asphaltene solutions for adsorption experiments. Thecrude oil has a viscosity of 3.1 × 106 cP at 25 °C and 6.4°API, and an approximatecontent of saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes of mass fraction of 13.0%, 16.9%, 49.9%, and 20.2%, respectively. Ceria (CeO2) nanoparticles of 21.6 nm and a surface area of 65 m2·g−1 ± 2 m2·g−1 were purchased from Nanostructured and Amorphous Materials (Houston, TX, USA) and were used as support [58,59]. The nanoparticles were functionalized with a mass fraction of 0.89% and 1.1% of NiO and PdO, respectively, using the incipient wetness technique. These amounts of NiO and PdO have been optimized in a previous study [40]. The sample was labeled CeNi0.89Pd1.1 and had an Ni–Pd particle size of 5.53–3.61 nm with a dispersion of 25% and 36%, respectively. A more detailed description of thecharacterization of the nanoparticles used in the present study can be found in a previous study [40].
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Selection of Catalytic Nanoparticles
For the selection of nanocatalyst, a series of tests have been carried out previously, starting from the evaluation of three bimetallic systems supported on CeO2±δ nanoparticles functionalized with transition element oxides (TEO) for the pairs Ni–Pd, Co–Pd and Fe–Pd [40]. Performance was studied according to adsorption isotherms, thermogravimetric analysis, isothermal conversions, gases produced, and coke yield. Then, a three-component simplex centroid mixture design (SCMD) was performed, varying the dosage of theTEO on the surface of the nanoparticle from a mass fraction of 0% to 2.0%. The nanoparticles were functionalized with a mass fraction of 0.89% and 1.1% of NiO and PdO, respectively.
2.2.2. Nanoparticles Regeneration
The nanoparticles regeneration process starts from theasphaltene adsorption followed by their catalytic decomposition. The nanoparticles with adsorbed asphaltenes were subjected to a steam atmosphere in a tubular furnace (Thermo Scientific Lindberg/Blue, Waltham, MA, USA) at 240 °C for 2 h. For this, N2 flow was fixed at 100 mL·min−1 and steam injection was performed at a flow rate of 6.3 mL·min−1 using a gas saturator with controlled temperature. In each regeneration cycle, part of the nanoparticles was taken to perform thethermogravimetric and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses.
2.2.3. The n-C7 Asphaltene Adsorption over Nanoparticles
For the adsorption tests, a stock solution containing 15,000 mg·L−1 of n-C7 asphaltenes in toluene was prepared and subsequently diluted to different concentrations. Thechanges in concentration after adsorption were determined by UV-vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The initial concentrations of then-C7 asphaltene solutions varied from 100 mg·L−1 to 1500 mg·L−1. A fixed amount of nanoparticles (100 mg per 10 mL of model solution) was employed. Once the nanoparticles were added to the solutions, they were stirred at 300 rpm and an aliquot was taken every 10 min for evaluating adsorption kinetics until the amount adsorbed remained constant. The nanoparticles with n-C7 asphaltenes adsorbed were separated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 45 min and dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h. The adsorption experiments were carried out at temperatures of 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C. The amounts adsorbed in units of mg of n-C7 asphaltenes per gram mass of nanoparticle was estimated according to Equation (1).
where (mg·L−1) and (mg·L−1) are the initial and equilibrium concentrations in the equilibrium, respectively; (L) is the volume of the solution and (g) is the mass of nanoparticles added to the solution. Theconcentration of n-C7 asphaltenes in the supernatant was measured at a wavelength of 298 nm using a Genesys 10S UV-vis spectrophotometer with an uncertainty of 0.001 a.u. in the measurement of absorbance. This implies a standard deviation of 0.05 mg·L−1 in thecalculation of the residual concentration.
2.2.4. Thermogravimetric Analyses
Thecatalytic activity of nanoparticles in the steam gasification of then-C7 asphaltenes adsorbed on the nanoparticle surface was evaluated using a thermogravimetric analyzer Q50 (TA Instruments, Inc., New Castel, DE, USA). For the development of thetests, N2 flow was fixed at 100 mL·min−1 and hauling steam controlled by thermostatic bath was introduced at the same time at a flow rate of 6.3 mL·min−1 using a gas saturator. During each catalytic regeneration cycle, the nanoparticles with adsorbed n-C7 asphaltenes were subjected to the TGA under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. For tests at isothermal conditions, the samples were heated to three different temperatures (230 °C, 240 °C, and 250 °C) [21]. On the other hand, the experiments at non-isothermal conditions were performed by heating the samples from 100 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C·min−1 to observe therate for mass loss of n-C7 asphaltenes on the nanoparticle surface [60]. Finally, each run at isothermal conditions was carried out with an adsorbed amount of n-C7 asphaltenes that remained constant at 0.02 mg·m−2, while for non-isothermal conditions theasphaltene load was 0.2 mg·m−2.
2.2.5. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis
During each catalytic regeneration cycle, the nanoparticles were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Specs X-ray photoelectronic spectrometer (NAP-XPAS) using a monochromatic source of Al−Kα (1486.7 eV, 13 kV, 100 W) together with a PHOIBOS 150-1D-DLD analyzer. Energies of 100 eV (1 eV·step−1) during three measurement cycles and 20 eV (0.1 eV·step−1) in ten measurement cycles were used for general and high-resolution spectra, respectively.
3. Modeling
3.1. Double Exponential Model
In this model, the adsorption mechanism and the transfer of the adsorbate to the adsorbent are described by two steps. In the first step, there is a fast transfer from the bulk to the adsorbent. This is followed by a second step, which is rate-determining, and is dominated by the diffusion through the adsorbent surface and asphaltene self-association over the active sites until equilibrium is reached. Equation (2) describes this model.
where the amount adsorbed at time t is expressed by (mg·g−1), the amount adsorbed in the equilibrium and the volume ratio of solvent/mass of material added to the adsorptive processes carried out are (mg·g−1) and (L·g−1). Additionally, the adsorption and mass transfer coefficients for the fast stage are given by (mg·L−1) and (min−1) respectively, while the adsorption and mass transfer coefficients for the slow stage are (mg·L−1) and (min−1). If , the exponential term corresponding to the rapid process can be assumed to be negligible [61,62,63].
3.2. Solid−Liquid Equilibrium (SLE) Model
Thechosen model allows the description of the adsorption isotherms using thetheory of association and adsorption of molecules in micropores suggested by Talu and Meunier [64]. The model can be described by Equations (3)–(5): [65]
where (mg·g−1), represents theconcentration of n-C7 asphaltenes in equilibrium and (mg·g−1) is the affinity of the adsorbate for the surface of the solid. A low value implies greater affinity, i.e., greater accessibility (or ease of access) of then-C7 asphaltenes to the active sites.Likewise, (g·g−1) is a constant related to theasphaltene self-association over the active sites on the surface of the nanoparticles, (g·g−1) is the maximum capacity of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption and the amount adsorbed is expressed as (g·g−1). Finally, is a relation that depends on the maximum adsorption capacity () and amount adsorbed ().
3.3. Thermodynamic Properties of Adsorption
To better understand the effect of temperature on n-C7 asphaltene adsorption, thermodynamic parameters are used. To describe thethermodynamic properties of adsorption, five temperature-independent parameters are needed, using equations of theSLE model, and replacing and with Equations (6) and (7) shown below.
where , is related to the entropy of reaction and , related to enthalpy. It is possible to find the three thermodynamic parameters, change in entropy , change in enthalpy and change in Gibbs free energy , through Equations (8)–(10).A negative value for the Gibbs free energy change would indicatethe spontaneity and thermodynamic favorability of the process. Similarly, a negative enthalpy change value would suggest that the process occurs exothermically; negative enthalpy also suggests that the adsorption would decrease as temperature increased.Finally, a positive value of the entropy change would indicate that due to then-C7 asphaltene adsorption, there would be an increase in therandomness of the system at the liquid-solid interface (nanoparticle n-C7 asphaltenes) [65,66].
3.4. Adsorption Potential Model by Michael Polanyi
The adsorption potential is defined as the work required for an adsorbate molecule to be transferred from the bulk phase to the surface of the adsorbent. In this theory, it is considered that the adsorbed layer is a thick film, whose density decreases as the distance from the surface increases. It is independent of thetemperature for a fixed adsorbed amount . The adsorption potential or Polanyi’s potential can be expressed as shown in Equation (11):
where the adsorption potential is represented by , and theconcentration of n-C7 asphaltenes in equilibrium is expressed as (g·g−1). Additionally, (J·mol−1·K−1) is theconstant of ideal gases, and (K) is the system absolutetemperature [67,68].
3.5. Estimation of Effective Activation Energy
Thecalculation of the activation energy was carried out with the following model given by the ICTAC Kinetics committee. Equation (12) provides a basis for differential kinetic methods and applies to any temperature [69,70].
where the effective activation energy is expressed by (kJ·mol−1), while is the degree of conversion. The latter depends on the initial mass of the sample, thecurrent mass at time t and, the final mass.Likewise, (s−1) is the pre-exponential factor and (K) is reaction temperature. The reaction mechanism is given by , and the reaction rate is . With the analysis of isothermal conditions and integration by separation of variables, the integral reaction model given by Equation (13) is obtained:Taking constant the energy of activation and applying natural logarithm to both sides, Equation (14) is obtained,From the plot of vs. , it is possible to obtain the value of the activation energy from the slope.
3.6. Statistical Analysis
The accuracy of the parameters for each model was presented using the optimized gradient model. The root mean square error (RMS) was selected to minimize the differences between the experimental values and the values obtained under thetheoretical considerations of the different models. The values obtained for the mean squared error were calculated under Equation (15), where m represents the amount of data or measurements made and × the evaluated parameter for each model:
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Selection of Nanocatalyst
In a previous study [40], three main systems were evaluated, the first consisting of a mass fraction of 1% of NiO and 1% of PdO (CeNi1Pd1), the second 1% of Fe2O3 and 1% of PdO (CeFe1Pd1) and the third 1% Co3O4 and 1% PdO (CeCo1Pd1), all supported on ceria nanoparticles. For the adsorption, the system CeNi1Pd1 showed better results than CeFe1Pd1 and CeCo1Pd1. Thecatalytic activity of the nanoparticles was evaluated with a series of tests, (a) rate for mass loss, (b) isothermal conversions, (c) analysis of the gaseous products and (d) coke yield. On all four tests, CeNi1Pd1 performed better than the other systems. Finally, to optimize theconcentration of themetals of the best system, a simplex-centroid mixture design (SCMD) was made using the STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVI software (StartPoint Technologies Inc. Addison, TX, USA) [71]. This new system was called CeNi0.89Pd1.1 and had a mass fraction of 0.89% and 1.1% of NiO and PdO respectively, on the surface of thecerium oxide [40].
4.2. Adsorption Kinetics
Figure 1 shows the adsorption kinetics for n-C7 asphaltenes on theCeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles through the different catalytic regeneration cycles at an initial concentration of 10 mg·L−1 of n-C7 asphaltenes. In general, two stages are observed in adsorption kinetics. The first stage is characterized by rapid adsorption due to the electrostatic and van der Waals attraction forces between the nanoparticle and then-C7 asphaltene molecules, and in the second stage, a slow uptake is observed that involves a gradual n-C7 asphaltene adsorption on the surface of the nanoparticles through complex reactions and the subsequent self-association over the active sites [72]. From Figure 1 it is observed that the process of asphaltene adsorption is a fast process where a maximum time of 40 min is required for the equilibrium to be reached. This is due to the impediment for diffusion through the materials, related to the auto-associative characteristics of theasphaltenes, which generate growth in the size of theasphaltene according to theconcentration in the system [73]. Additionally, in each cycle the time to reach equilibrium does not change drastically, and the amount of n-C7 asphaltenes that adsorbs at that point decreases from 0.1740 mg·g−1 to 0.1160 mg·g−1 from cycle one to cycle nine, respectively.
Figure 1
Asphaltene adsorption kinetics on CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles through several catalytic regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification. Adsorption kinetics were constructed for a fixed initial concentration of n-C7 asphaltene of 10 mg·L−1. The symbols are experimental data, and the continuous lines are from the double exponential model.
Table 1 presents the parameters of the double exponential model and the associated error obtained for the materials as a function of the initial concentration of n-C7 asphaltenes and the regeneration cycles of nanoparticles. As shown with the estimation of the associated errors, the double exponential model shows a good correlation with the experimental results. In general, a proportional relationship is not observed between the parameter and the amount adsorbed through thecycles.
Table 1
Estimated values of the parameters of the double exponential model of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption kinetics on CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles through catalyst regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification. The parameters are the amount adsorbed (), the adsorption () and mass transfer () coefficients for the fast stage, and the adsorption () and mass transfer () coefficients for the slow stage, respectively. Adsorption kinetics were obtained for an initial n-C7 asphaltenes concentration of 10 mg·L−1.
Cycle
Nads,m,exp ± 0.01 (mg·g−1)
Nads,m,cal ± 0.01 (mg·g−1)
Df ± 0.02 (mg·L−1)
kf ± 0.01 (min−1)
Ds ± 0.02 (mg·L−1)
ks ± 0.01 (min−1)
%RMS
1
0.17
0.17
0.98
0.41
0.45
0.06
0.12
2
0.16
0.17
0.76
0.38
0.34
0.03
0.11
3
0.15
0.15
0.69
0.21
0.65
0.00
0.29
4
0.15
0.15
0.70
0.36
0.20
0.02
0.28
5
0.15
0.15
0.84
0.63
0.47
0.10
0.14
6
0.14
0.14
0.59
0.24
0.97
0.01
0.17
7
0.14
0.13
0.79
0.34
0.73
0.10
0.13
8
0.12
0.12
0.83
0.22
0.12
0.02
0.07
9
0.12
0.12
0.65
0.20
0.53
0.00
0.28
The amount adsorbed can be explained by materials that, due to their high affinity for n-C7 asphaltenes, saturate quickly. This is because, with the passage of catalytic regeneration cycles, there was a loss of accessible active sites that allowed greater adsorption of the aggregates on its surface. Also, due to the low values of the parameter and it is concluded that the adsorptive process of n-C7 asphaltenes on nanoparticles CeNi0.89Pd1.1 was essentially governed by one stage [74].
4.3. Adsorption Isotherms
In Figure 2a–c, then-C7 asphaltene adsorption isotherms are showed for theCeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticle at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C through several cycles of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption. It was observed that these nanoparticles have a high amount of adsorbed n-C7 asphaltenes and this feature is maintained in subsequent cycles. For all cases, type Ib isotherms were obtained according to the IUPACclassification. The effect of temperature, the experimental results, and the parameter of theSLE model show that with increasing temperatures, the adsorbed amount of n-C7 asphaltenes decreases [73]. This is due to thetemperature influence on the aggregation state of then-C7 asphaltenes to the extent that the latter can be adsorbed in different forms such as aggregates, or individual molecules [73]. On the other hand, Figure 2 shows that the adsorption isotherms obtained throughout thecycles remain type Ib, which means that the high affinity of then-C7 asphaltenes towards the nanoparticles is maintained. In addition, at low concentrations (Co < 500 mg·L−1) the amount adsorbed does not change significantly in any of thecycles evaluated. However, the values of the maximum possible adsorbed amounts were reduced from 27.03 × 10−2 g·g−1, 28.86 × 10−2 g·g−1, and 29.68 × 10−2 g·g−1 for cycle 1 to 22.37 × 10−2 g·g−1, 24.03 × 10−2 g·g−1, and 25.36 × 10−2 g·g−1 for cycle 9 at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C, respectively.
Figure 2
Adsorption isotherms of n-C7 asphaltenes onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles evaluated at (a) 25 °C, (b) 55 °C, and (c) 75 °C through catalyst regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification. Adsorption isotherms were constructed for different n-C7 asphaltene concentrations from 100 mg·L−1 to 1500 mg·L−1. The symbols are experimental data, and the solid lines are from the SLE model.
Table 2 presents the parameters of theSLE model for then-C7 asphaltenes adsorbed on nanoparticles. No significant change of is observed as thecycles occur. This value increased by approximately 21%, 26% and 31% for 25 °C, 55 °C and 75 °C respectively from cycle 1 to cycle 9, meaning that the adsorption affinity is strongly affected by the regeneration cycles. On the other hand, the parameter did not exhibit great changes (from 1.15 × 10−2 to 1.17 × 10−2), and this means that the degree of slef-association of n-C7 asphaltenestends to stay constant with the passage of the regeneration cycles.
Table 2
Estimated values of the solid−liquid equilibrium (SLE model parameters Henry’s law constant (), the degree of self-association () and maximum amount adsorbed () for n-C7 asphaltene adsorption isotherms onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles, evaluated at 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C through catalyst regeneration of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification.
Cycle
Temperature
KH±0.02[mg·g−1] × 10−2
K.±0.08[g·g−1] × 10−2
Nmax±0.01[g·g−1] × 10−2
%RMS
25
2.64
1.15
27.03
0.004
1
55
8.45
3.35
28.86
0.014
75
15.98
3.45
29.68
0.023
25
2.65
1.15
27.02
0.004
2
55
8.46
3.36
28.57
0.013
75
16.03
3.46
29.43
0.020
25
2.65
1.16
25.78
0.004
3
55
8.49
3.37
27.19
0.010
75
15.84
3.48
29.43
0.012
25
2.76
1.16
25.46
0.002
4
55
9.54
3.37
27.13
0.003
75
19.44
3.48
29.43
0.007
25
2.86
1.16
25.35
0.001
5
55
9.88
3.37
27.02
0.002
75
20.12
3.49
29.33
0.022
25
3.09
1.16
25.31
0.000
6
55
10.63
3.36
27.01
0.003
75
21.57
3.48
29.09
0.026
7
25
3.15
1.17
24.00
0.000
55
10.75
3.42
25.91
0.005
75
21.76
3.49
27.49
0.039
8
25
3.20
1.17
22.81
0.001
55
10.90
3.45
24.50
0.010
75
22.03
3.49
25.88
0.063
9
25
3.35
1.17
22.37
0.006
55
11.41
3.44
24.03
0.036
75
23.03
3.54
25.36
0.119
4.4. Thermodynamic Studies
Table 3 summarizes the values of thethermodynamic parameters calculated from the effect of temperature on n-C7 asphaltene adsorption onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles. In all cases the negative value of was maintained throughout the 9 cycles of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption/decomposition, indicating that no additional energy was necessary to generate the interactions between theasphaltene molecules and the nanoparticles. This indicates that the process was thermodynamically favorable. In addition, decreased only from cycle 1 to cycle 9 by 0.5%, 3.1%, and 6.5% for 25 °C, 55 °C, and 75 °C, respectively, suggesting that the reaction did not lose spontaneity. Contrarily, the values were positive in all cases and these do not exhibit a considerable increase with each regeneration cycle. Therefore, therandomness at the interface of the adsorbent/adsorbate did not change. It is important to note here that its value only increased by 9.3% in cycle 9 concerning adsorption cycle 1. This slight increase in could be due to once theasphaltene is adsorbed on the nanoparticle, the self-association over the active sites is promoted. The values of the were negative for all cycles evaluated, suggesting the exothermic nature of the interactions between then-C7 asphaltenes and the surface. This value increased only 2.6% from cycle 1 to cycle 9. The evaluated thermodynamic parameters were in agreement with Franco et al. [75] and Nassar et al. [66].
Table 3
Thermodynamic parameters for the adsorption of n-C7 asphaltene onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles through different catalyst regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification. The change in entropy is expressed by , change in enthalpy is and change in Gibbs free energy is .
Cycle
Temperature (°C)
ΔSadso ± 0.02 × 10−2 [J·(mol·K)−1]
−ΔHadso ± 0.01 [kJ·mol−1]
−ΔGadso ± 0.01 [J·mol−1]
25
6.04
1
55
6.03
29.08
9.58
75
10.25
2
25
6.05
29.13
6.04
55
9.58
75
9.90
3
25
6.07
29.18
6.03
55
9.57
75
9.68
4
25
6.08
29.23
6.02
55
9.56
75
9.67
25
6.14
29.32
6.02
5
55
9.56
75
9.66
25
6.22
29.36
6.02
6
55
9.55
75
9.63
25
6.30
29.43
6.02
7
55
9.54
75
9.60
25
6.35
29.66
6.02
8
55
9.53
75
9.60
25
6.65
29.87
6.01
9
55
9.28
75
9.58
4.5. Polanyi’s Adsorption Potential
Thecharacteristiccurves for then-C7 asphaltene adsorption over the surface of the nanoparticles are illustrated in Figure 3. It is important to mention at this point, that a low value of the Polanyi’s potential implies the need for a lower energy demand to carry out the adsorptive phenomenon. As it can be observed, the adsorption potential slightly decreases as more cycles have occurred. However, it did not decrease considerably from cycle 1 to cycle 9, due to the adsorptive capacity of the nanoparticles is conserved and the adsorption remains strong during all cycles evaluated. In other words, the work required to transfer an asphaltene molecule from the surface to a given distance from the surface did not vary significantly, decreasing by only 2.6% for the same amount adsorbed from the first cycle to the ninth. This behavior also suggests that the adsorbate−adsorbent interactions in thecase of CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles are stronger for the first cycle than for the remained. The adsorption potential corresponds, therefore, to an increase in free energy experienced by the adsorbate during adsorption at equilibrium, with its adsorbed amount at concentration , indicating that the adsorbate−adsorbent interactions remain strong and therate at with which n-C7 asphaltenes were adsorbed did not change. These results were in agreement with those found by Cortés et al. [67], Betancur et al. [68] and Wu et al. [76], who observed that a stronger affinity between the adsorbate−adsorbent pair generates a higher potential value, i.e., the adsorbate is more likely to migrate to the surface of the nanoparticle instead than remaining in the bulk phase.
Figure 3
Polanyi’s adsorption potential (A) as a function of the amoun adsorbed (N) for n-C7 asphaltene adsorption on CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles through several catalyst regenerations of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification.
4.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis of n-C7 Asphaltenes
4.6.1. Mass Loss Analysis
The decomposition-gasification of n-C7 asphaltenes adsorbed on the nanoparticle CeNi0.89Pd1.1 was evaluated by heating the samples from 100 °C to 600 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C·min−1 under a water-saturated N2 atmosphere. Figure 4 shows thecomplete TGA profile as a function of thetemperature for n-C7 asphaltenes in the absence and presence of raw and regenerated CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles. Thetemperature range evaluated was divided into three main regions of low (LTR), medium (MTR) and high (HTR) temperature, as suggested in the literature [77]. The first region ends at about 250 °C, the MTR region will then range between 251 °C and 450 °C, and finally, the HTR region has temperature values between 451 °C to 600 °C.
Figure 4
The rate for mass loss as a function of the temperature for catalytic steam decomposition of n-C7 asphaltenes in the absence and presence of CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles for several catalyst regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification. Nitrogen flow rate = 100 mL·min−1, H2O(g) flow rate = 6.30 mL·min−1, heating rate = 20 °C·min−1, and asphaltene load of 0.02 mg·m−2.
The decomposition of n-C7 asphaltenes in the absence of nanoparticles was carried out in the HTR region, with the main decomposition at 455 °C. The presence of theCeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles as catalytic agent decreases this value to 210 °C in the LTR region, and with continuous decomposition in the MTR region and main intensities at 280 °C and 370 °C. This is due in the first instance to the heterogeneous surface of the nanoparticulate material, which due to the presence of NiO and PdO on the support, generate different catalytic effects by the different interactions between metal oxides and the support NiO/CeO2±δ, PdO/CeO2±δ, NiO-PdO/CeO2±δ. This could be due to the growth inhibition of PdO nanocrystals by the migration and coalescence behavior of theNiO atoms over CeO2 and the higher dispersion of PdO nanocrystals have concerning theNiO [78,79]. Also, a possible variation in the size of theasphaltene molecules can affect the decomposition. It is worth to remember that, as a fraction, asphaltene do not consider only one kind of molecule. Instead, a wide distribution of asphaltene molecules with diverse molecular weight can be found in thecrude oil from low molecular weight samples with a high amount of aliphaticchains, to high molecular weight compounds with a large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) core. This trend was maintained during all thecatalyticcycles evaluated, with the difference that the intensities in the first peak decrease as the nanoparticles are regenerated and the intensities of the other two peaks increase, evidencing the suppression of the addition reactions of then-C7 asphaltenes due to the stabilization of free radicals by hydrogen molecules in hydrogenation reactions [80,81,82]. Additionally, cycles 8 and 9 also exhibited a mass loss in the HTR region at about 455 °C. This behavior reflects that there is a loss, to a small extent, of thecatalyticcapacity of the nanoparticles to break down the heavier hydrocarbonchains into lower molecular weight hydrocarbons. This also lead to an increase in heteroatoms, like oxygen, and metals, such as iron, on the surface of the nanoparticle by 9.2% and 6.3% respectively (see XPS analyses below). The increase in theconcentration of these elements could increase the probability of generating coordinated bonds (HA-TE), which require greater energy to break. Additionally, as explained in Section 4.7 below, CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles lose catalyticcapacity through a decrease of their concentration by approximately 28.6% of Ce3+ ions on the surface.
4.6.2. Isothermal Conversion
Panels a–c in Figure 5 show the fraction of conversion (α) for n-C7 asphaltenes adsorbed on CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles as a function of time at three different temperatures of 230 °C, 240 °C, and 250 °C. From Figure 5, in the first instance, it is observed that the degree of reaction (α) of then-C7 asphaltenes in the presence of the nanoparticles changes with temperature. In general, with the increase of this variable, the reaction rate increases, and therefore, the transformation of then-C7 asphaltene molecules into lighter hydrocarbons and consequent gas generation occur in a shorter time. This agrees with the results reported by Nassar et al. [69], Cardona et al. [39], and Medina et al. [40]. Also, thecatalytic effect of the nanoparticles is reflected throughout all cycles evaluated, as CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles are capable of decomposing 100% of n-C7 asphaltenes adsorbed. However, the time required to perform 100% of said conversion increased by 30%, 25%, and 12.5% for 230 °C, 240 °C, and 250 °C respectively, from cycle 1 to cycle 9. This behavior is corroborated by the activation energy values obtained, which increased from 10.7 kJ∙mol−1 to 59.8 kJ∙mol−1, meaning the nanoparticles required more energy for thecracking reactions. The total conversion of n-C7 asphaltenes was related, among many factors, to the role played by thehydrogen (H2) produced by theasphaltene-nanoparticle interactions [82]. TheCeO2±δ nanoparticle and the transition element oxidescracked the heavier molecules into lighter molecules, and through hydrogen production, the nanoparticles also stabilize thefree radicals, which facilitates and gives support to thecomplete decomposition of the heavy molecules. Stabilizing thefree radicals also inhibited the self-association of n-C7 asphaltenes, generating a residual of 0% [40,83,84]. The variation of the time required to convert 100% of n-C7 asphaltenes was mainly due to a loss of available active sites on the surface of the support, due to theretention of heteroatoms and metals that require a longer time to decompose.
Figure 5
Isothermal conversion as a function of time at (a) 230 °C, (b) 240 °C, and (c) 250 °C for n-C7 asphaltenes in the absence and presence of CeNi0.89Pd1.1 through several catalyst regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification. Nitrogen flow rate = 100 mL·min−1, H2O(g) flow rate = 6.30 mL·min−1, heating rate = 20 °C·min−1, and asphaltene load of 0.2 mg·m−2.
4.6.3. Effective Activation Energy of n-C7 Asphaltene Thermo-Decomposition in the Presence and Absence of Nanoparticles
Effective activation energy was calculated following the isothermal method [69]. For this, plots of vs. were constructed (Figure 6), and the value of the activation energy for each cycle was calculated from the slope of the straight line, taking into account the values obtained at the three temperatures at (230 °C, 240 °C, and 250 °C). Figure 7 shows the activation energy values for the gasification of virgin n-C7 asphaltenes and their gasification after adsorption on theCeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticle in each regeneration cycle. The estimated value for the activation energy of then-C7 asphaltene decomposition reactions on nanoparticles in cycle 1 was 10.7 kJ∙mol−1, that is, it decreased by approximately 95% over the value reported in the absence of nanoparticles (211.52 kJ∙mol−1). As the nanoparticle was regenerated, the activation energy increased from cycle 1 to cycle 9 by 49.1 kJ∙mol−1. It is important to mention at this point, that up to the seventh cycle, the activation energy values are lower than for the value reported for theCeO2±δ support without functionalization, which is 44 kJ∙mol−1 [40]. This means that, although the nanoparticle requires more energy for the reactions associated with the gasification process as it is regenerated, it continues to have a better performance thanks to the addition of the transition elements on its surface. Also, it is important to remember that the main advantage of theNiO- and PdO-functionalized ceria nanoparticles lies in the reduction of thetemperature for asphaltene decomposition. Also, the ability of the nanoparticles to change its oxidation state from Ce3+ to Ce4+ in oxidation and reduction conditions allows having a greater number of interactions with the steam molecules and asphaltene heteroatoms, increasing its reaction capacity and catalytic activity. Finally, thechange in the activation energy shows that the gasification reaction was affected by the redox cycle Ce3+/Ce4+ since theconcentration of Ce3+ ions on the surface of the nanoparticle decreases. Further, considering that these ions are mainly responsible for thecatalytic performance of the support, it can be said that the effective activation energy increases as thecapacity of the redox cycle is hindered.
Figure 6
Arrhenius plot for the isothermal model of decomposition-gasification of n-C7 asphaltenes in the presence and absence of nanoparticles CeNi0.89Pd1.1 through regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification.
Figure 7
Estimated values of activation energy for isothermal model of catalytic steam decomposition of n-C7 asphaltenes using CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles through catalytic regeneration cycles of adsorption and subsequent catalytic steam gasification.
4.7. XPS Analysis of CeNi0.89Pd1.1 Nanoparticles through Catalytic Regeneration Cycles
Figure 8 shows the survey spectra for thecatalysts after the fourth regeneration cycle. The high-resolution spectra, for the main elements at the surface of thecatalyst, are also shown. As expected, thecatalyst surface was composed mainly of oxygen from theceria and the transition elements oxides, palladium, and nickel, as it was nominally prepared (CeNi0.89Pd1.1). Furthermore, iron was found after the first cycle of regeneration. This element proceeds from theasphaltene molecules which could contain some transition elements, such as Fe, Ni, V, depending on their origins [85]. For all samples, carbon from the sample support tape (graphite tape), was analyzed and used as a binding energy reference (284.8 eV). According to the binding energies, after thecalcination process of regeneration, all the transition elements are mainly found as oxides. However, as in the O1s high resolution, XPS was decomposed, and around 2% of the superficial oxygen was found as hydroxide. It is well known that Ce compounds were basic, and held the possibility of reacting with water to form cerium hydroxides [86]. Also, Ni and Fe held the same possibility [87,88]. Ni, Fe, and Pd were exhibited on thecatalyst surface in theoxidesNiO, Fe2O3, and PdO, respectively. For Pd, a signal at 335.5 eV was present, showing that a fraction of the element was present at the surface in its metallic state (Pd0) [89]. This phenomenon can be explained by thethermal decomposition of thePdO to form Pd0 and gaseous oxygen [90].
Figure 8
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the nanoparticles CeNi0.89Pd1.1 after cycle 4 of regeneration in the n-C7 asphaltene adsorption/decomposition through catalytic steam gasification for the main elements present at the surface Ce3d, Ni2p, Fe2p, O1s, and Pd3d.
Figure 9 shows theCe3d decomposed XPS high-resolution spectrum corresponding to cycle 4 and thecomponents of the decomposed signals used to calculatethe percentage of and are indicated [91]. As thecycles occur, thecomponent , , , and , (corresponding to ) increase in relation to the , and , of the .
Figure 9
Decomposed high-resolution XPS Ce3d spectrum. U0, V0, U′, and V′ correspond to Ce3+, and U, V, U″, V″, U‴, V‴ to Ce4+ [91].
Using the XPS spectra survey at high resolution, the different concentrations and atomicratios at the surface of thecatalyst CeNi0.89Pd1.1 were calculated. These results are shown in Figure 10 as a function of the regeneration cycles (1, 2, 4, y 9). In Figure 10a, theconcentrations of the most relevant elements are shown. The surface of the nanoparticles is mainly composed of oxygen that increases its concentration in each regeneration cycle. Conversely, theconcentration of ceria on the nanoparticles’ surface decreased with the passage of cycles, indicating that the active sites composed of ceria are covered by heteroatoms such as oxygen and iron.
Figure 10
Surface atomic concentration and ratios of the different analyzed elements through XPS of the CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles in the n-C7 asphaltene adsorption/decomposition in catalytic steam gasification for the regeneration cycles 1, 2, 4 and 9. (a) Atomic concentration of the all analyzed elements, (b) atomic Ce3+ and Ce4+ concentrations, (c,d) atomic ratios and (e) cerium ratios and concentrations according to oxidation state.
It is known that ceria signals present quitecomplex characteristics due to hybridization with bound orbitals and the fractional occupation of valence orbitals 4f [92,93]. It has been shown that theCe3d XPS spectrum of a compound can be deconvoluted into six signals and, if some species are also present, four more signals have to be added [93]. From these peaks, it can be observed that the oxidation state is predominant while the peaks are weak. This is because the electrons are easily transferred from to oxygen or other species. The / ratio on the surface of the samples, analyzed over thecatalytic regeneration cycles shown in Figure 10c, is strongly affected by the absolute binding energy positions that are characteristic of Ce3d. The percentages of and were calculated using Equations (16) and (17) [94,95,96,97,98,99,100].As mentioned above, theCeO2±δ also has autocatalytic properties that have the ability to reverse the oxidation state from to , allowing it to return to its initial state. However, through the progression of the regeneration cycles of the nanoparticles, the percentage of ions present on the surface of the nanoparticle decreases, and since ions are responsible for providing CeO2±δ with catalytic activity, the latter decreases too. In addition, theconcentration ratio of Ce4+/Ce3+ ions in theceria nanoparticles also decreases with the passage of thecycles. Therefore, the number of oxygen vacancies on the surface increased, and this was reflected in the behavior shown in Figure 10c. Consequently, reaction capacity decreases to the extent that the nanoparticle loses part of its catalytic activity due to the interruption in its redox cycle. Theconcentration ratio of Ce4+/Ce3+ ions in theceria nanoparticles is important for the number of oxygen vacancies on the surface, which determine reaction capacity. The mechanism had been described by Equations (18)−(20) [55]:Figure 10b, however, shows the variation of the transition elements (TE, Ni + Fe + Pd) related to thecerium and oxygen on the surface. It is possible to observe that TE increases during the regeneration cycles, which implies that thecerium atoms are less accessible for thechemical reactions and involved in the redox cycle (Ce4+/Ce3+) as shown by the decrease in Ce3+concentration in atomicratio to theCe4+ (see Figure 10c). All these facts imply a decrease of active sites and therefore a reduction of catalytic activity in the nanomaterial. The deposition of theiron over thecatalyst’s surface, which increases theTEcontent, can block the active catalytic sites of theceria, implying a loss of catalytic activity. Also, theNi concentration on the surface of the nanoparticle possibly decreases due to a coating of theceria on the active site of themetal, decreasing its exposed surface area.
4.7.1. Catalytic Effect of Ce4+/Ce3+ Redox Couple on the Thermodynamic and Adsorption Properties of CeNi0.89Pd1.1 Nanoparticles
As thechemical nature of theCeO2±δ nanoparticles can change depending on the amount of and species present in the system, it is important to analyze how various properties change with the increase or decrease of species content. Figure 11 shows the behavior of entropy, Polanyi’s potential, and activation energy regarding theconcentration of ions on the nanoparticle surface through different catalytic regeneration cycles.
Figure 11
Catalytic effect of ions on (a) activation energy, (b) entropy and (c) Polanyi’s adsorption potential for n-C7 asphaltene adsorption onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles catalytic steam decomposition through regeneration catalytic cycles 1, 2, 4 and 9.
Panels a and b in Figure 11 show that the behavior of activation energy and entropy increase with the rising concentration of ions on the surface of the nanoparticles. This is possibly because these ions are responsible for thecatalytic activity of thecerium oxide. The decrease in the presence of ions causes a reduction of this activity, and therefore, the nanoparticles will require more energy for thethermal gasification reactions that decompose the adsorbed heavy fractions. On thecontrary and as expected, the Polanyi potential decreases with the reduction in ions. If the nanoparticle is losing catalytic activity, it may be due to a reduction in its adsorptive capacity and affinity to adsorb asphaltenes. As explained in Section 4.5, the potential to bring theasphaltene from the bulk phase to the surface of the nanoparticle becomes lower when there is a reduced affinity between the adsorbed-adsorbent pair.
4.7.2. Effective Activation Energy and Kinetics of the Catalytic Steam Gasification of Asphaltenes in the Presence and Absence of Nanoparticles
Figure 12 shows the Henry constant as a function of (a) Polanyi’s potential and (b) activation energy. There is a direct relationship between the adsorptive and catalytic properties of the evaluated nanoparticles. From panel a of Figure 12, it can be seen a slight increase in the values of Henry’s law constant as Polanyi’s potential decreases. This behavior is mainly due to the lower affinity between the adsorbate−adsorbent pair, so the potential decreases. Also, this trend is independent of thetemperature. Conversely, if this affinity decreases, the energy needed to thermally decompose theasphaltene molecules increases. This behavior can be observed in panel b of Figure 12.
Figure 12
The relationship between Henry’s law constant and (a) Polanyi’s adsorption potential and (b) effective activation energy for n-C7 asphaltene adsorption onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles and subsequent catalytic steam decomposition through regeneration catalytic cycles.
Finally, Figure 13 shows the behavior of the Polanyi’s potential (A) as a function of the activation energy and thechange in the entropy of the system. From Figure 13, it is possible to see a decrease in the A values from 27.2 kJ∙mol−1 to 26.5 kJ∙mol−1 as the activation energy and entropy increase. With the decrease in Ce3+, the reduction in redox capability, and the increase of theTE on the surface of the nanoparticles with the passage of catalytic regeneration cycles, thecatalyticcapacity begins to decrease, and consequently, the nanomaterials require more energy to promotewater-gas shift and steam reforming reactions. The increase in the entropy change as the adsorption potential decreases is due to the loss of affinity between the adsorbate−adsorbent, generating that theasphaltene presents weaker interactions with nanoparticles, and therefore, interacts more easily with other asphaltene molecules due to their self-assembling capacity. All of these tendencies show how the synergetic interaction between TE (Pd and Ni) and the support (CeO2±δ in this case) are important and crucial for catalytic performance with regard to activation energy and resistance to regeneration through the oxidation cycles. Also, as shown in these results, both theCe3+/Ce4+ redox couple and their interaction with theTE are quite important.
Figure 13
The relationship between Polanyi’s adsorption potential and (a) effective activation energy and (b) entropy for n-C7 asphaltene adsorption onto CeNi0.89Pd1.1 nanoparticles and subsequent catalytic steam decomposition through regeneration catalytic cycles.
5. Conclusions
This study provides information on then-C7 asphaltene adsorption/decomposition through various cycles of CeO2±δ nanoparticle regeneration. These nanoparticles were functionalized with NiO and PdO (CeNi0.89Pd1.1) to provide them with greater selectivity and catalytic activity. It was demonstrated that the adsorption properties of the nanoparticles do not change significantly as thecycles advance, thus confirming their regenerative capacity. That is to say, the autocatalytic properties of CeO2±δ that allow it to reverse oxidation state also give rise to a new cycle of n-C7 asphaltene adsorption/decomposition. This is reflected in the adsorption kinetics, where for a fixed concentration of n-C7 asphaltenes, the amount adsorbed and the time needed to reach equilibrium remain approximately constant. Likewise, the adsorption isotherm nanoparticles were observed to maintain their capacity for n-C7 asphaltene adsorption, with also a high affinity for theasphaltene to be adsorbed by the nanoparticle. The slight increase in the Polanyi adsorption potential results showed that the work required for an adsorbate molecule to transfer to the surface of the adsorbent does not vary significantly between cycles, which consequently conserves the adsorption properties of nanoparticles.On the other hand, with thethermodynamic parameters calculated using theSLE model, it was shown that the process is spontaneous and thermodynamically favorable, that is, it does not need additional energy; it also has exothermic nature and randomness in the adsorbent/adsorbate interface. This is reflected in the negative values of the free energy of Gibbs and the enthalpy, and the positive value of entropy. The nanoparticles were able to completely decompose then-C7 asphaltenes during all cycles causing a decrease in the activation energy necessary to carry out theasphaltene partial oxidation and gasification reactions. This serves as further proof that thecatalytic property is not lost with the passage of the adsorption and decomposition cycles.Finally, with this study, it was possible to demonstrate that functionalized CeO2±δ nanoparticles may improve theoil recovery process when applied to steam injection processes, allowing greater n-C7 asphaltene decomposition without losing their catalytic and adsorption properties.
Authors: Rebeka Díez; Oscar E Medina; Lady J Giraldo; Farid B Cortés; And Camilo A Franco Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 5.076
Authors: Oscar E Medina; Cristina Caro-Vélez; Jaime Gallego; Farid B Cortés; Sergio H Lopera; Camilo A Franco Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 5.076