Literature DB >> 31085817

A volatile biomarker in breath predicts lung cancer and pulmonary nodules.

Michael Phillips1, Thomas L Bauer, Harvey I Pass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: previous studies have reported volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath as apparent biomarkers of lung cancer. We tested the hypothesis that a robust breath VOC biomarker of lung cancer should also predict pulmonary nodules in chest CT images.
METHODS: Biomarker discovery study (unblinded): 301 subjects were screened for lung cancer with low dose chest CT (LDCT), and donated duplicate samples of alveolar breath for analysis with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC MS). Monte Carlo analysis of breath chromatograms revealed a mass ion as a biomarker that identified biopsy-proven lung cancer as well as suspicious pulmonary nodules on LDCT. The biomarker was termed Mass Abnormalities in Gaseous Ions with Imaging Correlates (MAGIIC). The chemical structure of MAGIIC was tentatively identified from the NIST library of mass spectra; the best-fit compounds included C4 and C5 alkane derivatives that were consistent with metabolic products of oxidative stress. Blinded validation of MAGIIC: the abundance of the MAGIIC biomarker was determined in a different group of 161 subjects undergoing screening with LDCT. They donated duplicate alveolar breath VOC samples that were analyzed at two independent laboratories. The study was blinded and monitored with Good Clinical Practice. The abundance of MAGIIC in breath predicted biopsy-proven lung cancer with 84% accuracy, sensitivity = 75.4% and specificity = 85.0%. MAGIIC also predicted pulmonary nodules in LDCT with 80.5% accuracy, sensitivity = 80.1% and specificity = 75.0%. Breath MAGIIC abundance was not significantly affected by tobacco smoking history.
CONCLUSIONS: in a blinded study, breath VOC MAGIIC accurately predicted lung cancer confirmed on a tissue biopsy, as well as suspicious pulmonary nodules observed on LDCT. MAGIIC may have been a product of oxidative stress and it could potentially be employed as an ancillary to LDCT to predict the likelihood that a pulmonary nodule is malignant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31085817     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ab21aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  5 in total

Review 1.  Analyses of lung cancer-derived volatiles in exhaled breath and in vitro models.

Authors:  Fouad Choueiry; Addison Barham; Jiangjiang Zhu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  [Advances on Collection and Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds 
in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Ling Guo; Hong Wu; Qiang Li; Chuan Xu; Yuyang Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 3.  Smartphone-Based Platforms for Clinical Detections in Lung-Cancer-Related Exhaled Breath Biomarkers: A Review.

Authors:  Qiwen Yu; Jing Chen; Wei Fu; Kanhar Ghulam Muhammad; Yi Li; Wenxin Liu; Linxin Xu; Hao Dong; Di Wang; Jun Liu; Yanli Lu; Xing Chen
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Exhaled-Breath Testing Using an Electronic Nose during Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: An Experimental Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lisa Goudman; Julie Jansen; Nieke Vets; Ann De Smedt; Maarten Moens
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  The promises and challenges of early non-small cell lung cancer detection: patient perceptions, low-dose CT screening, bronchoscopy and biomarkers.

Authors:  Lukas Kalinke; Ricky Thakrar; Sam M Janes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.