Literature DB >> 31085342

Update on the use of exome sequencing in the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities.

Lauren Ferretti1, Rhiannon Mellis2, Lyn S Chitty3.   

Abstract

Unexpected fetal abnormalities detected through ultrasound scanning in pregnancy may have a monogenic aetiology but are difficult to diagnose. Next generation sequencing now enables us to sequence fetal exomes, providing increased resolution and broader diagnostic capability compared to traditional cytogenetic prenatal tests, improving the yield and accuracy of diagnoses and allowing better counselling for expectant parents. Here we review published studies of exome sequencing (ES) for prenatal diagnosis over the last 5 years and address important questions for its clinical implementation, including clinical utility, which groups benefit most, and practical and ethical challenges for interpreting and reporting results. We observe that fetal ES substantially improves diagnostic yield relative to cytogenetic techniques. However, diagnostic rates vary widely between studies, largely attributable to differences in case selection. Recently several large studies report variations in diagnostic yield between phenotypic groups, with fetuses with multisystem abnormalities most likely to receive a diagnosis from fetal ES. Challenges for prenatal ES include the limitations of ultrasound-based fetal phenotyping, the need for rapid return of results in pregnancy, and technical limitations compared to whole genome sequencing. We also consider ethical issues around potential secondary findings and variants of uncertain significance and the complex counselling needs these present. Prenatal ES is a valuable tool to diagnose fetal abnormalities and, as it is implemented in the clinic, more large-scale research will serve to further delineate its clinical utility, as well as generating new knowledge about fetal phenotypes and informing guidelines for case selection, reporting results and genetic counselling.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exome sequencing; Fetal structural abnormalities; Monogenic disorders; Prenatal

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31085342     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  10 in total

1.  Discovering a new part of the phenotypic spectrum of Coffin-Siris syndrome in a fetal cohort.

Authors:  Pleuntje J van der Sluijs; Marieke Joosten; Caroline Alby; Tania Attié-Bitach; Kelly Gilmore; Christele Dubourg; Mélanie Fradin; Tianyun Wang; Evangeline C Kurtz-Nelson; Kaitlyn P Ahlers; Peer Arts; Christopher P Barnett; Myla Ashfaq; Anwar Baban; Myrthe van den Born; Sarah Borrie; Tiffany Busa; Alicia Byrne; Miriam Carriero; Claudia Cesario; Karen Chong; Anna Maria Cueto-González; Jennifer C Dempsey; Karin E M Diderich; Dan Doherty; Stense Farholt; Erica H Gerkes; Svetlana Gorokhova; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Pernille A Gregersen; Scott E Hickey; Mathilde Lefebvre; Francesca Mari; Jelena Martinovic; Hope Northrup; Melanie O'Leary; Kareesma Parbhoo; Sophie Patrier; Bernt Popp; Fernando Santos-Simarro; Corinna Stoltenburg; Christel Thauvin-Robinet; Elisabeth Thompson; Anneke T Vulto-van Silfhout; Farah R Zahir; Hamish S Scott; Rachel K Earl; Evan E Eichler; Neeta L Vora; Yael Wilnai; Jessica L Giordano; Ronald J Wapner; Jill A Rosenfeld; Monique C Haak; Gijs W E Santen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 8.864

2.  How can prenatal exome sequencing inform future pregnancies?

Authors:  Asha N Talati; Kelly L Gilmore; Emily Hardisty; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 10.693

3.  Postpartum women's attitudes to disclosure of adult-onset conditions in pregnancy.

Authors:  Vitalia Libman; Michal Macarov; Yechiel Friedlander; Sidra Goldman-Mellor; Salomon Israel; Drorith Hochner-Celnikier; Yishai Sompolinsky; Uri Pinchas Dior; Michael Osovsky; Lina Basel-Salmon; Arnon Wiznitzer; Yehuda Neumark; Vardiella Meiner; Ayala Frumkin; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Hagit Hochner
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.242

4.  The fetus in the age of the genome.

Authors:  Dagmar Schmitz; Wolfram Henn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 5.881

5.  What is the meaning of a 'genomic result' in the context of pregnancy?

Authors:  Shiri Shkedi-Rafid; Rachel Horton; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Prenatal Exome Sequencing: Background, Current Practice and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniele Guadagnolo; Gioia Mastromoro; Francesca Di Palma; Antonio Pizzuti; Enrica Marchionni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02

7.  A two-year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next-generation sequencing in high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Konstantin Ridnõi; Kai Muru; Maria Keernik; Sander Pajusalu; Eva-Liina Ustav; Pille Tammur; Triin Mölter-Väär; Tiina Kahre; Ustina Šamarina; Karin Asser; Ferenc Szirko; Tiia Reimand; Katrin Õunap
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  GREEN-DB: a framework for the annotation and prioritization of non-coding regulatory variants from whole-genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Edoardo Giacopuzzi; Niko Popitsch; Jenny C Taylor
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  A framework for reporting secondary and incidental findings in prenatal sequencing: When and for whom?

Authors:  Danya Vears; David J Amor
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.242

10.  Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Simon M Outram; Julia E H Brown; Astrid N Zamora; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.772

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.