Literature DB >> 31083087

Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology Following Lateral Wall and Peri-modiolar Cochlear Implantation.

Chanan Shaul1, Christofer W Bester1, Stefan Weder1, June Choi2, Hayden Eastwood1, K V Padmavathi1, Aaron Collins1, Stephen J O'Leary1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Spikes in cochlear implant impedance are associated with inner ear pathology after implantation. Here, we correlate these spikes with episodes of hearing loss and/or vertigo, with a comparison between lateral wall and peri-modiolar electrode arrays.
METHODS: Seven hundred seventy recipients of Cochlear's slim-straight, lateral wall electrode (CI422), or peri-modiolar (CI512) electrode were investigated for impedance spikes. Impedance fluctuations were defined as a median rise of ≥ 4 kΩ across all intracochlear electrodes from baseline measurements taken 2 weeks after switch-on. Medical records were analyzed from 189 of the 770 patients.
RESULTS: The slim straight, lateral wall electrode was found to spike in impedance at a significantly higher rate than the peri-modiolar array (17% vs 12%). The peri-modiolar electrode tended to spike in impedance earlier than the slim-straight electrode. Impedance spikes were found to significantly correlate with medical events (hearing loss, vertigo, or tinnitus). Overall, in the "spike" group, 42 of 75 patients (56%) demonstrated a clinical event during the impedance spike, whereas 26 of 114 patients (22%) of the "non-spike" group had a clinical event. This significant difference existed with both implant types.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a small, but significant increase in impedance spikes in lateral wall electrodes, and support the relationship between spikes in cochlear implant impedances and postoperative inner-ear events, including the loss of residual hearing and vertigo. Monitoring cochlear implant impedance may be a method for early detection, and so the prevention, of these events in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31083087     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  4 in total

1.  Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Hyejin Yang; Jeong-Seo Kim; Helin Hernandez; Jacob J Oleson; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

2.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Wilhelm Wimmer; Luca Sclabas; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weder
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 3.  Intracochlear fibrosis and the foreign body response to cochlear implant biomaterials.

Authors:  Megan J Foggia; Rene Vielman Quevedo; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-13

4.  Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Young Seok Kim; Hyung Dong Jo; Yoonjoong Kim; Marge Carandang; Gene Huh; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.